Mitsubishi Lancer needs no introduction: today this model is among the leaders among foreign women sold in Russia. Over the past year, more than 39 thousand cars left the salons! The love of Russians for Lancer in particular and Mitsubishi as a whole has made our country one of the key markets for the company in Europe. So much so that especially for us they are preparing configurations that are inaccessible to Europeans. Such is the 135-horsepower 2-liter sedan with sporting ambitions that has just appeared on sale, while being equipped with an “automatic”.
Competitors? There are many. How about a model that motorists are willing to queue for for months? A two-liter “matryoshka” (as the people called the Mazda-3) is not equipped with an “automatic”, which is rather a minus for the top version, but a possible plus for an athlete. Comparing two expensive performances of popular cars, let's close our eyes to the differences in the bodies - after all, they are not loved at all for the capacity of the trunks ...
BEAUTY IS A TERRIBLE FORCE
I have a tremulous attitude towards Mazda. Particularly strong is the nostalgia for the cozy, albeit simple, interior and the headlights jumping out of the body of the 323rd model of the late 80s ... How long ago it was! Now "Mazda" is no longer the same: once reputed to be perhaps the most modest among the "Japanese women", she suddenly turned into a fashionista and a favorite of the public:
Hello, is this a car dealership? Can I buy a "three"?
Of course, but we only accept orders for six months in advance!
A similar answer has been heard by suffering motorists from the first days of Mazda-3 sales.
I go around the test car, admiring the red sparks of the lamps in the lanterns, look into the cunning eyes of the “spotlight” headlights, smile in response to the radiator grille. "Treshka" is undeniably charming. No wonder they fall in love with the car!
The interior did not let us down either: the feeling that you are sitting in a car of a higher class arises immediately and does not go away. The main magnet is the front panel. In the nozzles of the instruments, red arrows flash invitingly, unusually frozen in the six o'clock position. You can adjust the brightness in two ways: ruby backlight in steps - with a button; and the purple halo of the instruments flares up when the rheostat rotates. What will be in motion?
From the first meters it becomes clear: a very responsive power unit. It is worth turning up the heat, and "Mazda" deftly accelerates even at speeds over a hundred. The set of the last hundreds of revolutions to the limit of 7300 is especially exciting. The short gear lever clearly finds desired gear, so it's hard not to believe in the passport 9 seconds to hundreds. It is possible to besiege the car very effectively, since the brakes are disc in a circle, the front ones are ventilated.
However, it is worth driving the hatchback onto a winding slippery path, as not the most pleasant character traits appear - first of all, this concerns the stabilization system. Having turned it off, he accidentally sent the car into a skid, which would be best suited for the epithet "weakly controlled." The demolition of the front end does not stop under the release of gas, you have to actively work with the throttle and steering wheel. The machine does not allow you to relax at high speeds, revealing nervousness.
OK, I press the DSC button on the panel and try to repeat the exercise. Here the situation changes dramatically: the stabilization system zealously rushes to the rescue, reducing the fuel supply and thereby preventing not only skidding, but also full acceleration!
Perhaps the smoothness of the ride is good? It corresponds to the canons of sports: shaking on small bumps and short-stroke suspension make you watch potholes more vigilantly. And the noise of the tires does not add comfort ...
As a result of our two-day communication, I did not manage to become related to the Mazda-3. It has a wonderful design, good finishing materials, a stylish interior, and an excellent air conditioning system. But at the same time - mediocre ride, specific handling, not the most comfortable seats ... From a car in a beautiful "wrapper" you expect "delicious" handling, but here ... Eh, where are you, honest "three hundred and twenty-third" 15 years ago? Missing You.
DON'T BORN BEAUTIFUL
Switching from Mazda to Lancer is not easy. Even the recent restyling will not make me call this lancer handsome. Although the plastic body kit in a sporty spirit is intended to make the car more noticeable, no one turns around on the street anyway.
A similar picture is in the cabin: it was slightly decorated with only light plastic on the front panel, which replaced the gloomy “stone” insert. As with all new cars, there are white dials on the instrument cluster. In our Intens configuration, the place of the air conditioner was taken by ... air conditioning, but already automatic: it catches up with the flow of the desired temperature, but you control the fan speed manually.
Perhaps, the owners of the Lancer still have one argument “for” with which you can’t argue: the car interiors in our configuration are not much different from the iconic Evolution - and those are several times more expensive! Here is the same cool Momo steering wheel, leather, with a cold aluminum hub ... And although the Recaro seats are not quite fighting, they are very tenacious, fixing the body well.
The first test of a car in which the "automatic" is equipped with a manual mode, for me, begins with the same exercise: an intersection, the first gear "by hand" - and gas to the floor. With a short bark, Lancer picks up 60 km / h and freezes - the “automatic” keeps first gear, and does not go higher! Unfortunately, such boxes are rare, but for a car with above-average ambitions, this is a fat plus: in a fast turn, the electronics will not offer unnecessary overdrive, and the driver can click down one step when it is necessary to brake the engine.
Further exercises finally clarify the nature of the "machine": slight thoughtfulness when switching to a lower one is the only complaint; but good engine braking and quick, almost imperceptible shifts in manual mode leave a very pleasant impression. As for the dynamics - against the backdrop of the Mazda, it is still not enough. Eh, the motor would still have twenty or thirty forces!
However, in most cases, the power reserve is enough. If it were not for the dashing wing looming in the rear-view mirror, and the sporting attributes in the cabin, the demand from the car would be different. And so - want more!
Unlike the Mazda 3, the Lancer cannot boast of a stabilization system even in the list of options. But at the same time "Mitsubishi" is clearer in reactions and will not frighten off a beginner: the beginning of the slide is quite easy to predict, and skidding is predictable and controllable. The car behaves a little clearer than less powerful modifications; we tend to attribute this to under-hood stretching and re-characterized dampers.
In terms of comfort, the Lancer is surprisingly good: the shaking is moderate, the tires are audible in moderation. That's just the motor, throwing up speed in the "kick-down", begins to speak in raised tones.
Despite the similar positioning, the Lancer and the three-ruble note are completely different machines in character. "Mazda" is more suitable for those who like to "work" behind the wheel and appreciate, first of all, good dynamics and appearance. Lancer is calmer and even more phlegmatic; yes, he will give way at the start from the traffic lights, but, perhaps, he will win back in the corners. It is invisible in the stream, does not please, but does not irritate the eye.
Well, once again we have to admit that machines are characterized by character traits similar to human ones. It is easier for someone to communicate with choleric people, others quickly find a common language with phlegmatic people. Some people like fashionistas, others are modest. The choice is yours.
Mazda 3 STYLISH APPEARANCE AND EXCELLENT ENGINE FOR MANY WILL BE THE DECISIVE trump card when choosing.
Overall score 7.7
Excellent motor, clear short-stroke gearbox, stylish exterior and interior.
Low ride, noise from rolling tires, the fifth door instantly gets dirty, not the most comfortable fit in the back seat, a rather high price.
Mitsubishi Lancer - A MODERATELY DYNAMIC CAR BRINGS UP WITH CLEAR HANDLING, A GOOD TRANSMISSION, THOUGHT ERGONOMICS AND A DECENT LEVEL OF COMFORT.
Overall score 7.9
Comfortable seats and steering wheel, clear and reliable handling, comfortable suspension.
Insipid interior and exterior, quite noisy on high revs and insufficiently powerful motor, lack of a stabilization system.
Golf-class cars from the Land of the Rising Sun have won a large number of fans around the world. The combination of a bright design in the corporate style, the latest achievements of design ideas, decent quality and reliability contributed to the achievement of certain peaks in the market by these models at one time. It is always difficult to choose, especially among used cars.
Let's find out what better lancer 10 or Mazda 3?
Overall rating
Mitsubishi Lancer X immediately after the premiere in 2007 became the bestseller of the market. And he became the last representative of this model. In 2017, the company announced the cessation of production of the Lancer 10. In Russia, they stopped selling it two years earlier. Buyers were given a choice of 1.5 (109 hp), 1.6 (117 hp), 1.8 (143 hp) and 2.0 (150 hp) petrol engines, as well as a manual or automatic transmission. Body options - sedan and hatchback. A "hot" version was also available - the legendary sports car Lancer Evolution.
Mazda 3 II generation was produced from 2008 to 2013 on the Ford platform. Body type - sedan and hatchback. Range of Mazda 3 engines - proven aspirated 1.6 (105 hp) and 2.0 (150 hp) with mechanics or automatic transmission. In contrast to the sports Lancer Evolution, a charged modification of the Mazda 3 MPS was produced.
We will carry out our comparison using the example of the Lancer 10 and Mazda 3 sedans with a manual transmission and popular 1.6-liter engines.
Engines
To compare Mitsubishi Lancer and Mazda 3 cars, let's analyze in more detail design features engines.
The Mitsubishi Motors 1.6 4A92 engine is a gasoline all-aluminum engine of the 4A series, developed jointly with the Daimler concern in 2004. The design uses 4 valves for each of the four cylinders, respectively two camshafts and a variable valve timing system with electronic control on release. Timing chain drive. Maximum power at 6000 rpm - 117 hp (86 kW). Maximum torque at 4000 rpm - 154 Nm. The compression ratio is 11:1.
The Mazda 1.6 Z6 engine is a 16-valve gasoline engine with two overhead camshafts and a variable valve timing system at the inlet. The cylinder block is cast iron. It is a development of the B series of engines, which uses a timing chain, an adjustable intake manifold, and an afterburning system for exhaust gases. Maximum power is reached at 6000 rpm and is 105 hp. (77 kW), and the maximum torque is 145 Nm at 4000 rpm. The compression ratio is 10:1.
As you can see, the compared motors have a similar design and technical characteristics.
Transmission
Mazda 3 five-speed manual gearboxes work flawlessly. The proven four-speed "automatic" also lives up to expectations. Five-speed hydromechanical 6 with a corrected defect when switching from third gear to fourth.
Five-speed mechanical boxes Mitsubishi Lancer gears were aggregated with any engine, but had design differences depending on the engine family. At the same time, they had high reliability. Four-speed classic automatic transmission quite old, but indestructible. The variator used on versions 1.8 and 2.0 is the weak link of Lancer 10. Japanese company Jatco was not reliable.
Both cars are equipped with a good manual transmission, but shifting clarity is better in Mazda.
Dynamics and reliability
Lancer, with all its sporty appearance, is an ordinary city sedan. Engine dynamics are enough for active movement in city traffic. On the track for overtaking or sharp maneuvers, it is better to switch to stick the gear lower. And still, the stock for a long overtaking will be insufficient.
The dynamic performance of the Mazda 3 is also limited by the engine. You can't call a car fast. And if the driving characteristics are balanced in the city, then with suburban rebuildings it is better to assess the situation in advance.
Character and durability
Lancer 10 during the operation of the owners deserved fame completely reliable machine with reasonable maintenance costs. The Achilles' heel was a modification with an overheating variator. For ten years on the roads of our country, Lancer has collected a small collection of faults.
Having lost a certain part of its visual appeal, the second generation Mazda 3 has become one of the most unpretentious and reliable cars in the world. model range Japanese brand. Many of the shortcomings of the predecessor have been eliminated, and the rest are minimized.
Suspension
Suspension Lancer 10 is harsh and transmits all small bumps pavement. Larger pits already cause unpleasant blows. At the same time, an independent multi-link is behind, and MacPherson is in front. But the car keeps a straight line perfectly and does not sway when changing lanes.
The fundamental design of the Mazda suspension is identical. Front MacPherson and rear - multi-link. The suspension is characterized by greater smoothness and energy intensity on the roughness of urban roads. On larger pits, a booming blow is possible. Trajectory maintenance on good level, rolls are minimal.
Comfort in urban conditions becomes Mazda's advantage.
brakes
Brakes Lancer disc on all wheels. The clarity and information content of the drive is noted. No complaints and the work of electronic assistants.
Disc brakes on both axles Mazda 3 have sufficient efficiency. The measured deceleration is complemented by the precise operation of the safety systems.
Steering
The Lancer responds well to steering inputs. Steering Mitsubishi medium informative.
The Mazda 3 steering is precise and responsive. The car handles better, but the information content drops at speed.
Salon
Minimalism in the interior of the Mitsubishi Lancer is reminiscent of sporting ambitions. IN color scheme gray-black tones prevail. In the interior trim, medium-quality hard plastic is used, while the junction of various panels is clearly visible. The front panel is separated by a narrow carbon-look insert that continues on the door trims. In the upper part of the panel under the visor there is a narrow information display. Head unit with large round knobs on the sides. At the bottom of the center console are three "kruglyash" climate control. On the dashboard in round wells - a speedometer and a tachometer. Between them is a trip computer window with well-read information. Wheel three-spoke with a comfortable grip and audio control buttons. Adjusting the driver's seat can comfortably accommodate a person of any height. The profile is comfortable, but there is not enough lateral support in corners.
Mazda 3 stands out with better materials in the cabin, as well as careful docking of elements. The plastic is hard though. On top of the front panel there is an arc of a visor with a trip computer. Dashboard with two wells in chrome trim. The audio system has a large central “washer” of adjustment and smaller side ones. The air conditioning system is controlled by classic round regulators, like a competitor's. The gray color of the interior is diluted with interesting silver inserts. The front seats are more rigid with sufficient lateral support. The steering wheel with three spokes, like on the Lancer, with additional control keys has a thinner rim.
Still, without appreciating the design delights, the quality of assembly and materials in the Mazda cabin is on top.
Body
The body of the Lancer 10 offers ample space for front and rear passengers. Three in the back row, of course, a bit crowded, but comfort is provided for two. The level of sound insulation of the body is quite modest - a distinct engine operation and knocks of sand and stones from under the wheels stand out.
In the cabin of the Mazda 3, there is also enough headroom in terms of height and width. It is possible to accommodate three in the back seat, but a tall passenger will be hindered by a high central tunnel. Noise isolation of the car is traditionally average. Noise from the engine, wheels and road surface is heard.
Trunk
The luggage compartment of the Lancer has a narrow opening and insufficient depth, in comparison with a competitor. The useful volume of the sedan is a little more than 300 liters.
3 highlights a convenient wide loading opening. As well as a larger volume of 120 liters.
Beauty and practicality
The aggressively sporty front of the Lancer 10 does not seem to fit in with the rest of the simplicity of the body lines. The negative slope of the expressive grille and predatory headlights are a legacy from a relative of the eighth generation Galant. The side profile is strict and unstretched. Slightly accentuated wheel arches and narrower side glazing hint at the car's sporty character. Small feed Lancer 10 with a massive bumper. The taillights are rectangular in shape, stretching from the fenders to the trunk lid.
The beauty of the Mazda 3 is also peculiar. Smiling grille in the front bumper and slanted front optics. Between the headlights on a solid panel is a large emblem of the manufacturer. The front wheel arches stand out from the crowd, and the lower stamping smooths out the sloping sidewalls. Sloping C-pillars add to the silhouette of swiftness. Behind a massive trunk lid and large headlights. The car has lost its former sportiness. Appearance is smooth-dynamic and rather feminine.
Price
The average price of Mitsubishi Lancer 10 on secondary market today - 400,000 rubles.
The average price of Mazda 3 of the second generation is 457,000 rubles.
Comparison results
According to the results of all nominations, Mazda 3 still wins, although the Mitsubishi Lancer 10 also held up with dignity. And, if lagged behind the opponent, then quite a bit.
compact cars from Japanese manufacturers consistently enjoy wide popularity among a huge number of motorists. The combination of prestige and brand recognition, modern design, the latest technology, high quality and affordable prices have allowed such models to occupy a dominant position in the middle segment.
Mitsubishi Lancer X became a real bestseller after the appearance of the model. New generation Lancer belongs to the C-class, received the first global platform "Project Global" as the basis. The range of power units is represented by gasoline atmospheric engines from 1.5 liters to 2.0 displacement. Options allow you to define a pair for the engine in the form of a mechanical or automatic transmission. Sedan and sportback body styles are available. The sports version of the 10th generation is called the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X.
Mazda 3 of the second generation was introduced as an updated model of the third series, received traditional sedan and hatchback bodies. The model belongs to the class "C", is based on the Ford C1 platform already tested on the previous generation. Common versions of power units are naturally aspirated gasoline engines of 1.6 and 2.0 liters. A couple for the internal combustion engine were automatic and mechanical transmissions. There is also a “charged” version of the Mazda 3 model called the Mazda 3 MPS, which was created to compete with the recognized giants of motorsport: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and Subaru WRX STI.
Further comparative review presents sedan versions of the Mitsubishi Lancer X and Mazda 3.
Mitsubishi Lancer X (2007–2011)
The front of the car turned out to be too aggressive against the background of the general simplicity of the body. A straight "cut" of the nose, a wide hood and narrow head optics highlight the harsh look of the car from the front. There are various options for the design of the radiator grille. The most common was the "solid" grille with large cells, affecting both the upper and lower parts of the massive bumper. The element is separated by a power arm for installing a license plate. The lower part received modest fog lights.
The profile of the machine is strict and compact. You can't call it stretched. A swift straight line does not start from the trunk itself, but originates from rear doors and ends near the front wheel arch. The wheel niches themselves are not very prominent against the background of common planes.
The side glazing area seems to be slightly narrowed, which is typical for the interior of sports models. Straight black pillars and narrow side mirrors complete the overall picture of the Lancer X's athletic profile. The rear part has a narrowed trunk lid and a massive bumper. Narrow stoplights of almost rectangular shape, located with a visual inclination towards the center. Stamping for mounting the number is located in the central part of the bumper, without affecting the luggage compartment lid.
Mazda 3
The appearance of the front of the Mazda 3 is characterized by a cheerful “smile” of the front bumper and bulging headlights, a straight line of the edge of the wide hood and small circles fog lights. Sports aggression in appearance There is practically no 3rd series, the car looks good-natured, youthful and a little feminine. The upper grille is missing, giving way to a solid front bumper panel with the brand's logo in the center. The lower part received the shape of a shield, large cells and a power insert for attaching the number. The car is perceived as smooth and dynamic, but not sporty.
The sedan's profile has received a slight tendency to visually increase the size of the car through stretching. Pretty stamping at the bottom of the doors hides their sloping shapes, and beveled rear pillar in the side glazing area visually gives the profile a swiftness. The windows, especially in the front, look quite large, and narrowed in the back. This is done in favor of modern trends in roof design. The wheel arches stand out a little from the general background, but you can’t call them muscular. Side direction indicators are small, and rear-view mirrors can be called decorative.
The rear of the car received a massive and relatively flat trunk lid. Large longitudinal brake lights have an abundance of white plastic inserts, giving the element an image of some “airiness”. There is no sporting seriousness in the rear either, although some severity is still present. Such design moves include a conditional spoiler on the trunk lid, the massiveness of the lower part of the rear bumper and stamping for a license plate. From the real "sport" there were only cutouts in the lower overhang for a chrome-plated exhaust pipe nozzle.
If we compare both models in basic configurations, then the Mazda 3 looks more modern, youthful and urbanized. Mitsubishi Lancer X definitely will not lag behind a competitor only in the presence of an expensive "sporty" Ralliart body kit, which increases the price.
Salon
Mitsubishi Lancer X
Sports orientation immediately catches the eye when examining the internal space of the model, implying minimalism. The dominant interior color is black and grey. The quality of materials is average, rather hard plastic everywhere. The fitting of the elements does not cause significant complaints, but the joints and seams are clearly visible, and the hardness of the materials used makes one seriously think that the appearance of extraneous squeaks and noise from rubbing panels during the operation of the car is almost inevitable.
The lacquered insert-saber “carbon look” visually divides the dashboard into three parts: upper, middle and lower. The insert itself received a conditional load in the role of the middle part. It has an alarm button and a passenger front airbag status indicator. This element-insert was continued on the door cards. Rectangular strict black airflow deflectors are quite large and make up a significant part of the interior of the front. Chrome in interior trim at least.
center console received a modest multimedia standard solution. In the upper part there is a narrow information screen of medium length, deeply planted in a kind of niche-visor. This solution avoids glare in sunny weather. The readings-pictograms on such a display are quite good, they look legible. The head unit itself does not stand out in any way, except for small round controls on the sides, the seats of which are finished in silver.
At the very bottom of the dashboard are three large chrome-plated controls to control climate system. They have the shape of a “washer” and are deliberately highlighted by designers.
Wheel consists of three improvised knitting needles, with function keys for radio control on the left side. The steering wheel also received large gray inserts, which contrasts with the dark range of interior trim. Adjustment is available only in the angle of inclination, but this is offset by a puffy comfortable rim and high-quality material that is wrapped around the steering wheel.
Dashboard consists of two deep wells for the tachometer and speedometer, the visors of which are located at a slight angle, centered in front of the driver. The edges of the wells received a thin chrome strip, which greatly enlivens the perception of the dashboard. The rectangular window of the on-board computer, as well as the area of information indicators, are located in the central part, between the main instruments. The trip computer is small but large enough to read useful information. The main color of instrument lighting and functional elements of the car was a sporty dark red color.
seat material good quality, but the profile of the chairs seemed soft. There is lateral support, but for sharp turns and sharp maneuvers, the element will obviously not be enough. Adjustment of the driver's seat in all planes, including height, allows you to find a comfortable position even for a person of fairly high stature.
Smooth shape armrest on the door map allows you to place your left hand comfortably, although the width of the element is not always enough, especially in tight winter clothes or a thick sweater. The center armrest may seem short to many while driving. This is due to the convenience of interaction with the gear knob.
Central tunnel not very high, has several convenient niches and cup holders, and the parking brake lever is shifted closer to the driver's seat in order to improve ergonomics when the driver contacts this element.
Mazda 3
The quality of materials at the first acquaintance with the interior raises no objections. The abundance of dark and hard plastic is quite reasonable for a car like this. price category. All elements are fitted with high quality, significant gaps and cracks that can visually attract attention were not found. The desire of designers to emphasize the high-tech model resulted in the creation of a kind of visor at the top of the dashboard. The model received a combination of round on the sides and rectangular air vents in the center. The side airflow controls feature stylized chrome rings. The silver insert above the glove box lid contrasts well with the dark plastic.
seat material high-quality and pleasant to the touch, the seams are neat, they are distinguished by well-executed stitching. The bottom cushion is adjustable in height and the backrest can be conveniently adjusted in steps. The profile is moderately rigid, and the lateral support will cope well with maneuvers at medium speeds. It is quite possible to get comfortable. A well-implemented pedal assembly also has this.
Door cards will not allow you to comfortably place your hand on the armrest, as large handles for closing the door may interfere with the implementation of this function.
Central armrest received a medium-sized backwater area, but for the successful interaction of the driver with the gearshift lever, this should be enough. The parking brake lever is moved closer to the passenger seat.
Central tunnel made in one piece with the central part of the dashboard, received a gray color in the front. On the central tunnel there are decorative functional niches that can be closed with lids, which is an excellent solution for storing small items and installing containers of moderate volume.
center console has a modest radio with a large silver washer-regulator and small dark round regulators on the sides. The main emphasis of design solutions was placed on a kind of "second tier" on the dashboard. Under the canopy are the information screens of the trip computer and navigation. In the version with a navigator, it looks richer, and in the basic versions, this solution causes controversial and mixed feelings. The monochrome BC is small in size, and the orientation of this element to the driver does not save from flare and reduced quality in the process of perceiving useful information.
Control block air conditioner made with the use of round regulators, which received a chrome-plated outline. These elements are large and easy to interact with.
Wheel It has tilt and reach adjustments. The rim may seem thin, but it is covered with high quality material that prevents slipping from the hands. There are three original knitting needles, one of which is made in gray. There is also an abundant presence of controls for useful functions of the car on the steering wheel.
Dashboard has two pronounced wells for the speedometer and tachometer. The edges of the wells were generously supplied with chrome. There is no visor for the instruments, they are deeply planted, and the instrument wells themselves perform this function, which is protective against glare. The backlight of instruments and elements is Mazda's signature combination of vibrant red and blue-violet.
To select the winner, it was necessary to be guided solely by the quality of materials and workmanship, and not by design. In this regard, Mazda is doing a little better, which determines the slight advantage of the model.
Driving performance
Survey models received a common 1.6-liter gasoline naturally aspirated engine and a manual transmission.
Mitsubishi Lancer X with the specified motor is an ordinary city sedan. The dynamics are enough for an active city traffic, but you should not expect rebuildings and sharp acceleration from the car. For highway overtaking, it is better to switch to a lower gear so that there is some margin. We are not talking about prolonged overtaking at high speeds, since the engine has no reserve for such maneuvers.
The front suspension is independent, MacPherson type. The rear is represented by an independent multi-link. Significant rigidity of the chassis of the car is noted. Changing the rubber profile and installing third-party shock absorbers do not change the situation much. With an expensive multi-link rear, this is a little strange. All small joints and uneven asphalt are transferred to the salon. Medium depth pits cause tighter hits. No, it’s not so easy to bring the car to a breakdown, it’s just hard and loud to drive. But there is no significant buildup at speed, the car keeps a straight line and obeys the moderately informative steering wheel well. Here the downfall of the running gear is only a plus.
Noise isolation can be attributed to rather low in the class. The engine is heard clearly and distinctly with a set of revolutions, and the wheel arches betray the sound of small stones and sand.
All 4th wheels received disc brake mechanisms. The brakes of the Lancer X are sharp and crisp, which is good news. Auxiliary electronic systems work flawlessly.
Mazda 3 demonstrates a reasonable balance of dynamic and driving characteristics. You can’t call a city sedan fast, but that’s why it’s city. In the flow of engine power is enough, but on the track with overtaking you need to be very careful. Switch in advance to downshift, evaluate the situation, power reserve after 140 km / h. quite a few.
The front suspension is independent, with MacPherson struts. Rear axle has an independent multi-link solution. The suspension is notable for its good energy intensity and smoothness, but it is quite possible to bring the car to a breakdown. The seeming silence on medium bumps will be followed by a booming blow on deeper pits. For urban asphalt, comfort is at the level for this class. The car steers moderately, the steering wheel cannot be called empty, but one should not expect much information at speed either. But there is a certain sharpness and steering precision. There are rolls, but they are quite acceptable. Keeping the trajectory and weak buildup in the track mode are positive aspects.
Noise isolation engine compartment on the Middle level. Like many others Japanese cars in a similar class, the wheel arches are not sufficiently insulated. The noise of the wheels, sandblasting and the hit of small stones are heard.
The brakes are quite effective. They are disc on all 4 wheels. The car slows down confidently and predictably, and the quality of braking is significantly complemented by the well-coordinated work of electronic assistants.
The comfort of the Mazda 3 suspension in urban operation becomes the main advantage of the model. The remaining indicators do not differ significantly from the Mitsubishi Lancer 10 in terms of their settings and quality of implementation.
capacity
Mitsubishi Lancer able to provide enough space in the cabin in the front row. This will be enough for tall drivers and passengers. The width of any discomfort is not expected.
The back row allows three to accommodate quite tightly, so that we can only talk about comfort for two riders. Legroom is sufficient, which is provided by an acceptable wheelbase. Above the head of the place will seem a little only for tall passengers in the back row.
The luggage compartment of the model has a narrow loading opening, which significantly loses to competitors in depth. Folding the rear row of seats can change the picture, but this is not the most common practice for sedans.
Mazda 3 will suit most drivers and front row passengers. The stock is enough both above the head and in width. The central tunnel can cause some inconvenience for the passenger's feet, but only those people whose growth is far above the average should be afraid of such a moment.
The rear row can accommodate three, but a comfortable ride for only two passengers becomes a traditional phenomenon for the class. There is enough legroom with a small margin. Tall passengers in the back row may experience a lack of headroom.
The luggage compartment is standard for a sedan. The advantage is a well-implemented loading opening, it is wide and allows you to conveniently load medium-sized items.
Mazda 3 is at almost the same level of spaciousness compared to the Lancer X, but significantly ahead of the competitor in terms of roominess and convenience of the luggage compartment.
economy
The Mitsubishi Lancer X outperforms the Mazda 3 in terms of economy, while boasting higher torque and dynamic performance.
Security
Basic Mitsubishi model Lancer X:
- ABS system
- EBD system
- brake assist system
- driver's knee cushion
Basic Mazda model 3:
- ABS system
- EBD system
- EBA system
- driver/passenger front airbags
- side airbags
crash test result Euro NCAP: 5 stars.
An in-depth analysis determines the Mazda 3 as the winner in the final safety assessment compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer X.
Lancer 10 is a car that has proven itself with car owners. It is reliable, safe, economical, modern, but not without flaws.
Competitors take advantage of this by creating cars that can force the buyer to abandon the choice of Mitsubishi.
These cars also have design flaws that do not allow the Lancer X to be forced out of the market.
Lancer 10 or Mazda
Choosing which car is better between Mitsubishi and Mazda 3 is quite difficult. Mazda benefits are:
- high-quality sound insulation;
- interior plastic looks more expensive;
- lack of "crickets";
- headlight washer;
- daytime running lights do not require complex activation.
The disadvantages of the Mazda 3 against the background of the Lancer are:
- the material of the buttons is too soft, so scratches remain on them during operation;
- worse handling in corners;
- paintwork more susceptible to damage.
If we make a comparison with the Mazda 6, then the Lancer is clearly inferior in dynamics and controllability. The disadvantage of the Mazda 6 is too low ground clearance. After installing the crankcase protection, there may be problems with overcoming obstacles on the road.
Compare Lancer X and Ford Focus
If the car owner has a large appearance, then it is better to refuse to purchase a Ford Focus. The interior is too cramped for people whose height exceeds 180 cm. The car also has a number of minor technical flaws:
- wipers do not clean the windshield;
- condensation forms in the headlights;
- the quality of the plastic in the pre-styling version is low, so for the absence of “crickets”, the choice should be made towards Focus 2;
- poor visibility in the rear-view mirrors;
- fraying the wiring of the trunk lock.
The choice towards the Ford Focus should be made if there is a desire to own a car with diesel engine. It is highly reliable. The rest of the engines have a shorter resource and are very whimsical, although they do not suffer from an oil burner like a 1.5 liter engine from Mitsubishi. On the whole this car designed for measured, city driving.
Mitsubishi Lancer 10 vs. Chevrolet Cruze
Chevrolet Cruze has mediocre dynamics, so if the car owner has a desire for a sporty ride, then the choice should be made in the direction of the Lancer 10 ralliart with power plants of 2.0 or 2.4 liters.
Also, what do you need to deal with? Chevrolet owners The Cruze is the less practical saloon. The plastic looks cheaper than the Lancer X. The interior is made in bright colors, which causes it to get dirty quickly. The steering wheel is made of leatherette, which causes rapid wear of the coating. In general, with the same service life, the Lancer X interior looks more attractive.
The advantage of the Chevrolet Cruze lies in reliability power plant. All children's problems of the motor have already been solved by the manufacturer, so the engine practically does not cause trouble for the car owner.
Lancer X or Honda Civic
Honda Civic is able to compete with Lancer 10. The car has good dynamic performance. Noise isolation is a level higher than that of Mitsubishi. The engine in terms of reliability corresponds to the 1.8 liter Lancer X engine, which is famous for its long resource.
Civic 8 will help you not to get lost in the stream of cars. Its design is filled with futurism. Dynamic performance is not inferior to Lancer 10.
The Civic 4d power plant is quite reliable, but coking occurs on 1.5 liter Mitsubishi engines when reaching 100 thousand km. Structurally, the power unit is more perfect than the one and a half liter Lancer 10 engine.
The disadvantage of the Civic is that the suspension is too soft. Rolls occur in corners, and when driving through bumps, shock absorbers often break through.
Mitsubishi Lancer X and Toyota Corolla
The advantages and disadvantages of Toyota Corolla originate from the manufacturer's policy regarding innovation. Toyota Motor Corporation is constantly striving to make its car as modern as possible. Therefore, in the production process are constantly introduced design changes. Among them there are both successful solutions and obviously unsuccessful ones. So, for example, the Corolla 150 has an option with robotic box transmission, which proved to be very problematic.
The choice of Toyota Corolla is justified in most cases, since the car has a number of advantages over Lancer 10:
- more reliable electrics;
- clear operation of the manual transmission;
- a long resource before the start of the oil burner, which the 1.5 liter Lancer 10 engine cannot boast of.
Compare Lancer X with Kia Rio
Kia Rio has a well-assembled interior and a spacious trunk. Noise isolation is worse than in Mitsubishi. Also noticeable are the mass of uneven seams and uneven paintwork. Handling is worse than that of Lancer 10. Reliability is also quite inferior to Mitsubishi.
Mitsubishi Lancer X compared to Hyundai Solaris
Solaris has a six-speed automatic transmission. This allows acceleration to be carried out with virtually no jolts. Despite the smaller engine size, which is 1.4 liters, the car shows itself to be voracious, especially in urban areas, consuming up to 11-11.5 liters per 100 km.
Lancer 10 or Skoda Octavia
Skoda Octavia has a turbocharged version in its line of engines with engine displacement reduction technology. This allows, depending on the need, to obtain either high efficiency or excellent dynamic performance. For example, acceleration to 100 km / h, Octavia is able to do in 8 s.
Inspection Lancer 10 before purchase
What to look for when purchasing a Mitsubishi Lancer X is summarized in the table below.
| Node or system | Note |
|---|---|
| Engine | Compression control on a 1.5 engine |
| Body | Rust spots are most common on cars before 2011 |
| Lubrication system | Maslozher characteristic of 1.5 liter engines. Possible extrusion of grease through the seals and seals due to the increased pressure of crankcase gases |
| Transmission | It is required to check the oil in the variator and automatic transmission. If there is a burning smell, then it is better to refuse to purchase a car. |
| Steering | Problems mainly in the EUR |
| Lighting | Check the absence of tarnishing of the headlight glass |
Mazda3 costs $2-4 thousand more than Mitsubishi Lancer, and this trend is typical not only for the market of new cars, but also used ones. Does it make sense to overpay so much when buying a car in the secondary market?
Both models are represented by two modifications: Mazda3 - sedan and hatchback, and Mitsubishi Lancer - sedan and station wagon. Today we will compare versions with a classic 4-door body.
Be careful!
In general, the bodies of both cars are distinguished by good corrosion resistance, although the pre-styling "triples" (2003-2006 onwards) have one weak point - the wing arches, they may turn out to be rusty. There are also comments on the condition of Mazda3 body parts - the rear fender liner is short-lived (made of fleecy material and destroyed under the influence of icing and salt). On Lancer before 2006, you should check the trunk lid lock - it can wedge due to water entering it.
The “troika” is distinguished by a more functional trunk. She has a wider loading opening and a much larger opening for access to the salon - with folded rear seats Mitsubishi Lancer has a narrow window leading into the cabin. Although in terms of volume luggage compartments and carrying capacity, both of these models are almost the same (see photo).
Salons of cars can accommodate five people. However, despite the fact that the rear sofa of the "troika" is molded for two, three passengers will be more spacious here than in Mitsubishi Lancer. Although there is a remark to the ergonomics of the Mazda gallery. The doorway of the rear doors is narrowed at the bottom of the middle pillar and seat cushion.
For lovers of active driving, Mitsubishi had Sport modifications with low-profile “rubber”, light aerodynamic body kit and rear wings. Such vehicles must be treated with increased attention. These are machines with a "hot" image, and they are usually exploited by active drivers. Therefore, the risk of getting into road troubles is much higher.
Noise isolation in both models is rather weak, and visibility is slightly limited only when looking back: a high "stern" - for the "troika" and a rear standard wing - for the Mitsubishi Lancer Sport. The plastic trim of both cars is hard to the touch, since it does not creak. Equipment malfunctions were found only in the "triples" of 2003-2004 of release (see "Resource and repair").
The fastest
Both cars were officially sold with two gasoline engines identical volumes - 1.6 liters and 2.0 liters. Among the Lancers imported by the "gray" way, there were also 1.8-liter "petrols", but they are rare.
For lovers of active driving, we recommend the “troika” - its engines with a larger liter of power and provide better dynamics. So, Mazda 1.6 l with manual gearbox accelerates to “hundreds” in 11 s, and 2.0 l - in 9 s, while the same versions of Mitsubishi - in 12.1 and 10 s, respectively. And these winning seconds in motion are very noticeable.
Among the engines of the “triples”, the 2.0 liter unit creates more problems - it is sensitive to fuel quality. Poor-quality fuel immediately affects the operation of the engine - idle speed “floats”, twitches under load. With active driving, there may be problems with the intake manifold - there is a backlash in the flaps of the mechanism for changing the geometry of the intake tract (manifested by a characteristic knock when the engine is idling). The failure is eliminated by replacing the manifold assembly. But in the 1.6 liter engine, no characteristic problems were identified.
Concerning Lancer units, then the characteristic problems are inherent in each of the engines. So, in a 1.6 liter engine, idle speed often floats. The reason is in the “broken” candle cap or the failure of the candle itself. With frequent refueling with low-quality fuel, one of the two catalysts may fail by 150 thousand km. 2.0-liter engines also “sin” with uneven idling, but due to clogging of the block throttle valve. Another characteristic "glitch" that is not a malfunction is twitches when starting to move and shifting gears in a cold state (especially in the cold season). In the 1.8-liter unit, problems with the starter were noted - in very coldy it can "burn out".
.jpg) |
.jpg)
|
.jpg) |
.jpg) |
.jpg) |
.jpg)
|
What clicks?
Both models are front-wheel drive and were equipped with mechanical and automatic gearboxes. Both units of the "troika" are presented in our country in almost equal numbers, and among the Lancer, versions with "mechanics" still prevail. The "automatic" Lancer is equipped with a "smart" control program that can adapt to different driving styles and, depending on this, change the moment of gear shifting.
In the "troikas" only the hydraulic clutch on the 1.6-liter versions can be disturbed - leaks of the working cylinder are noted (to be replaced as an assembly). Another weak point, typical for cars of the first years of production (2003-2005), is the play in the splined connection of the “grenade” and the hub, which is manifested by clicks in the transmission. Subsequently, the creators eliminated the design miscalculation and instead of the locking bolt, the axle shaft was fixed with a nut.
In 2.0-liter Lancer with "mechanics", due to the overly active temperament of their owners, "burning" of synchronizers and clutch discs was noted. The "gray" versions with a 1.8 liter engine used a stepless variator, with the repair of which in Ukraine there will be difficulties.
Turned off - restart!
The steering of both vehicles can be problematic. In “triples” produced after 2006, with a 2.0 liter engine, in the heat, when driving in a traffic jam, the electric power steering motor overheats and turns off. You can restore performance by restarting the engine. For this malfunction, there was a recall campaign for a free replacement of the problem node. Otherwise, the steering is quite durable - steering rods are able to go out for about 150 thousand km. Mitsubishi Lancer has less reliable power steering of 1.6-liter versions: on cars until 2006, the rake can knock during the passage of bumps with the steering wheel turned out, and the tie rods on bad roads broke up to 30-60 thousand km. But since 2006, they have become a little stronger.
There are no comments on the brakes of the triples, and the Lancer with a 2.0 liter engine sometimes has a knock in the calipers.
Serviceable suspensions of both cars are knocked down and provide good stability, giving pleasure to active driving. Versions with 2.0 liter engines have tighter running settings, which is also facilitated by low-profile tires installed on these modifications. Moreover, the Lancer tire profile is lower (195/50 R6), which is why their sidewalls often tear on broken roads.
Structurally, the suspensions are similar - an independent McPherson is used in front, and “multi-links” are used in the back. Our roads made it possible to identify characteristic features of both cars. weak spots. At the "troika" these are the support pads of the front struts (they run about 50 thousand km), and at the rear - the wishbones (about 40 thousand km) and the stabilizer struts (60 thousand km). At Lancer, the ball bearings of the front levers (80 thousand km) and the bushings of the front stabilizer (about 70 thousand km) do not differ in particular durability, and in the rear “multi-link” - the upper support pillows rear shock absorbers(50 thousand km). In the 1.6-liter versions, the rear springs sag, and in the 2.0-liter versions, produced before 2005, the floating outer silent blocks of the three wishbones (30-50 thousand km) are short-lived. Later, floating silent blocks were replaced with more durable conventional ones (more than 100 thousand km).
The rest of the “consumables” of the suspension turned out to be more reliable for the “troika” - the silent blocks of the front levers serve 120 thousand km, the ball bearings - almost 200 thousand km, the “gum” of the remaining levers of the rear “multi-link” - about 150 thousand km. At Lancer, the “gum bands” of the front levers and the rear “multi-link” are nursed a little less - 100 thousand km. The maintenance of the running gear of both cars is increased by the fact that some consumables are changed as an assembly with levers.
Do not be categorical!
Mazda3 became the best in our today's review. This model turned out to be more reliable than its competitor, many of its components and assemblies are more durable. In addition, the "troika" is richer equipped and more dynamic.
In turn, Mitsubishi Lancer will attract buyers with a more affordable market value, a corrosion-resistant body and hassle-free equipment. In terms of reliability, it loses to the “troika”, but the identified problems are not so serious and costly as to categorically refuse the opportunity to save on purchases.
.jpg) |
.jpg)
|
.jpg) |
.jpg)
|
History of Mazda3
1998-2003
Produced Mazda 323 (BJ).
08.03
The production of the new Mazda3 model starts, body index BK.
03.06
Model restyling. Modernization of engines. The most powerful version is presented - Mazda3 MPS.
01.09
The second generation Mazda3 (BL) debuts.
Resource and repair
Body and interior |
|
| The equipment is richer. The loading opening of the trunk is wider and the opening of access to the salon is larger. The gallery is more spacious. | High market value. The wheel arches are rusting (until 2006) and the rear fender liner is destroyed. The doorway of the rear doors is narrowed at the bottom of the middle pillar and seat cushion. Hard plastic finish. The review is limited by the high "stern". Failure information display and front airbag sensor (2003-2004 versions). |
Power unit and transmission |
|
| Higher liter engine power and better dynamics. The 1.6 liter engine is reliable and hassle-free. | The choice of engines is limited. Intake manifold problems, fuel quality sensitivity (2.0L). Clutch slave cylinder leaks (1.6 l). Backlash in the splined connection of the "grenade" and the hub (2003-2005). |
Suspension, steering, brakes |
|
| Good stability and handling. Some parts of the "running" are more reliable than those of a competitor. Trouble-free brakes. | Short-lived support pillows of the front struts, transverse levers of the rear "multi-link". Problems with the electric power steering (after 2006). Expensive service "undercarriage". |
History of Mitsubishi Lancer
.jpg)
1996-2002
The eighth generation Mitsubishi Lancer was produced.
07.03
Mitsubishi Lancer introduced for the European market.
09.03
Lancer Sales IX began in Ukraine.
09.05
Restyling. New grille, bumpers, sills.
03.07
The production of the successor - Lancer X has begun. Sales of the predecessor continue.
09.09
Sales of Lancer IX in Ukraine have been discontinued.
Resource and repair
Body and interior |
|
| More affordable price. More headroom in the gallery. | Can wedge the trunk lid lock (until 2006). Less functional trunk. Versions Sport review back limits the regular wing. Hard plastic finish. |
Power unit and transmission |
|
| More advanced adaptive automatic transmission. "Automatic" has established itself as trouble-free. | The choice of engines is limited. Breakdown of candle tips, failure of spark plugs and catalyst (1.6 l). Clogged throttle body, twitching when cold (2.0 L). Possible problems with the starter (1.8 l). Burning of synchronizers and clutch discs (manual gearbox with a 2.0 liter engine). Difficulties with the repair of the variator (with a 1.8 liter engine). |
Suspension, steering, brakes |
|
|
Suspension settings provide the pleasure of an active ride. |
Short service life of ball bearings, floating silent blocks of the rear suspension, upper support pads of the rear shock absorbers. Sagging of the rear springs (1.6 l). Expensive service "undercarriage". Unreliable rack and a small resource of tie rod ends (steering version 1.6 l). Knocking in calipers (version 2.0 l). |
| Prices for new non-original spare parts, UAH* | ||
|
Front/Rear brake pads |
||
|
Air filter |
||
|
Fuel filter |
||
|
Oil filter |
||
|
Shock absorber front/rear |
||
|
Front/rear bearing hubs |
||
|
Spherical bearing |
||
|
steering tip |
||
|
Sleeve / front stabilizer bar |
||
|
Clutch kit |
||
|
*Prices may vary slightly depending on the manufacturer and modification of the vehicle. |
||
common data |
||
|
body type |
||
|
doors/seats |
||
|
Dimensions, L/W/H, mm |
||
|
Equipment weight / full, kg |
||
|
Trunk volume, l |
||
|
Tank volume, l |
||
Engines |
||
|
Petrol 4-cylinder: |
1.6 L 16V (105 HP), 2.0 L 16V (150 HP) |
1.6 L 16V (98 HP), 1.8 L 16V (114 HP), 2.0 L 16V (135 HP) |
Transmission |
||
|
type of drive |
||
|
5-, 6-st. fur. or 4-st. ed. |
5-st. fur., 4-st. aut., CVT variator |
|
Chassis |
||
|
Brakes front/rear |
disk. vent./disk |
disk. vent./disk |
|
Suspension front/rear |
independent/independent |
independent/independent |
|
195/65R15, 205/55R16, 215/50R17 |
195/60R15, 195/50R16 |
|
| Performance evaluation | |||
| Category | Evaluation of participants, points | ||
| Mazda | Mitsubishi | ||
Price |
|||
|
spare parts |
|||
|
car |
|||
Body |
|||
|
Corrosion resistance |
|||
|
Condition of parts, availability of spare parts |
|||
Salon |
|||
|
Quality |
|||
|
Convenience |
|||
|
Visibility |
|||
|
Equipment reliability |
|||
|
Equipment level |
|||
Trunk |
|||
|
Volume in the "traveling" state |
|||
|
Volume with unfolded seats |
|||
|
Practicality/functionality |
|||
|
load capacity |
|||
Engines |
|||
|
Possibility of choice |
|||
|
Dynamics of the most common versions |
|||
|
Reliability |
|||
|
Cost of service/economy |
|||
gearbox and transmission |
|||
|
Possibility of choice |
|||
|
Reliability |
|||
Suspension |
|||
|
Durability |
|||
|
Maintenance cost |
|||
|
Stability and comfort |
|||
|
Ground clearance |
|||
Steering |
|||
|
Durability |
|||
|
Maintenance cost |
|||
|
Efficiency |
|||
brakes |
|||
|
Durability |
|||
|
Efficiency |
|||
Overall rating |
500 |
351 |
341 |
Julius Maksimchuk
Photo from the editorial archive
If you find an error, please highlight a piece of text and click Ctrl+Enter.