If you would like to purchase inexpensive car, which has an acceptable quality for its price, then you will surely come across the question of which is better, Hyundai Solaris or Chevrolet Aveo, because these cars occupy leading position in the B-class segment in the car market Russian Federation. Traditionally, for comparison, models with an economical power unit, an automatic gearbox and a fairly modern technical equipment and nice exterior
Hyundai Solaris
Hyundai Solaris is built on the basis of the Accent model, which is sold on other automotive markets, but has more perfect forms.
Modern appearance, streamlined shape and unusually executed headlights definitely add to the attractiveness of the car.
The workmanship leaves a good impression, the paint application is perfect, it will withstand small stones and scratches. The doors close tightly and not loudly, the bumpers are made of high quality plastic, which makes them resistant to frost.
The interior is made of materials of quite acceptable quality, allowing you to comfortably spend time on a long journey. The back seat will be as comfortable as possible for two, despite the fact that the automaker claims a comfortable arrangement in the back row of five people. The maximum equipment will pleasantly please the buyer with numerous options. Only soundproofing fails, which is not surprising for budget-class cars.
Belonging to the Gamma family, it is characterized by high quality. He showed himself exclusively positive side. It is distinguished by quiet operation, economical use of fuel, excellent dynamics and high acceleration speed. The volume can be chosen from two options: 1.4 or 1.6 liters. Consumption fits into less than 10 liters per hundred in the city. A five-speed manual gearbox, a four-speed automatic.
The new Hyundai Solaris 2014 received six-speed automatic and manual transmissions for the 1.6-liter unit.
The quality of the suspension is not bad, it is quite soft, but does not work well on large pits. Behavior on the road is stable. Rear brakes - disc. Unlike the first series of this model, modern Solaris does not lead off the road.
The set of trim levels is wide enough to get a decent wave specifications Hyundai Solaris is already available for the amount of 514,900 rubles, which must be paid for the basic version. The top-end equipment with a 1.6-liter engine and a manual gearbox will cost 640,900 rubles, and if you want an automatic, then 680,900 rubles.
Chevrolet Aveo
The front panel with a frivolous instrument panel (according to motorists - for children) marks the youthful style of this car. Blue backlight instrumentation is adjustable in brightness. The front panel is made of plastic, but of quite tolerable quality. There is a little more space for passengers in the back row, comfortable accommodation is provided for three.
The gearbox of the Chevrolet Aveo prevails over the box of older versions of the Korean model, the six-speed automatic of the modern type works without the slightest complaint. You can also note the economical fuel consumption.
The Chevrolet Aveo suspension does not cause any complaints, it works at a decent level, small bumps in the road go unnoticed. The disadvantages include sound insulation, it is obviously not enough. Also a minus are the rear drum brakes.
In terms of price characteristics, the Chevrolet Aveo is clearly losing to the Hyundai Solaris. The cost of the basic configuration of a second-generation car in a sedan body starts at 668 thousand rubles, and for the top-end modification from 1.6- liter engine capacity 115 Horse power and automatic transmission it is necessary to pay 764 thousand rubles.
Owners opinion
The most relevant in the question of which is better, Hyundai Solaris or Chevrolet Aveo, should be the reviews of car owners, which we publish below:
- at Aveo ground clearance less than 5 millimeters than Solaris, which has. The plastic on the Aveo's front bumper is too low;
- both models use very cheap plastic, but that's why they are budget;
- the contours and outlines of the plastic located on the doors on both models are primitive and uncomfortable;
- Aveo pleases with the presence of additional pockets on the dashboard, the Korean model does not have this;
- the armrest in Aveo is terribly uncomfortable, it seems that it was removed from a regular bus, in this respect Solaris wins;
- some believe that the Aveo has narrow seats, while others speak of Solaris seats in this way;
the luggage compartment in Aveo, despite being narrow, has a larger volume than the Korean model; - many are dissatisfied with the ability to adjust the driver's seats and steering column in both cars.
Naturally, the material presented to your attention is not a dogma, but it can be of great help when choosing a car for purchase. Both models deserve attention., which is demonstrated by their impressive sales on Russian market, and which one to choose, you have to decide for yourself.
Due to the combination of its qualities, the Korean urban compact Hyundai Getz became a favorite with practical small car buyers. Will the debutant of this class be able to compete with him - Chevrolet Aveo?
He can, he can. And we were convinced of this with our own eyes. Let's start with appearance. Getz and - cars are very nice. Their design is expressive and at the same time calm. They organically fit into the urban landscape and, as a rule, are not considered either “purely feminine” or “purely masculine” cars. A sort of unisex on wheels. There are no hard age restrictions.
When choosing Getz, the consumer may have questions regarding the configuration, engine power, number of doors, and finally - Getz can also be a three-door. Those who are inclined to buy Aveo, in addition, will be forced to make a choice between two very different in design “muzzles” of the car. One is the one we are used to. The second one is fundamentally different: there are other head optics, a radiator grille, a bumper and foglights. It is with this design Chevrolet Aveo.
Aveo and debuted at the time, however, then he was still Daewoo Kalos. I must say, this design option for the front of the car is more similar to the creation of the Giugiaro masters than what we have seen before. Although the "parallel" Aveo is branded by this famous studio.
By overall dimensions the cars are also very similar, if not identical. In any case, until you look at the specification, it is very difficult to determine which is more or less. But to be completely objective, Aveo is still larger than Getz, although we are talking about millimeters.
In this regard, as you understand, the internal dimensions of both machines are very similar. So, to say that, for example, there is much more space in Aveo than in Getz is simply ridiculous. However, it is still more convenient in Getz. And first of all, because of the seats that are more friendly to the human anatomy. Plus, unlike Aveo, Getz has backrest adjustment for second-row seats, which is important.
Approximately at the same level and the aesthetic component, which is always taken into account when evaluating the interior. However, it seemed to us that Getz is still closer to European cars in terms of finishing and selection of materials, while Aveo promotes Korean motifs more, albeit with a slight Italian touch (note the dial wells and central air ducts).
Where the cars differ greatly is in the volume of the trunk: the Aveo has 34 liters less, and with the 2nd row seats folded down, it is 150 liters. The reason is the different kinematics of folding the seats. In Aveo, everything is simple: I dropped the back on the seat, that's all the body movements. Getz is more difficult. First you need to put the back on the seat, and then lean this sandwich against the backs of the front seats. It turns out a little more complicated, but what a gain in usable volume!
Both Aveo and Getz in our case had engines of a similar volume - 1.4 liters, but the sixteen-valve Aveo engine had more power - 94 hp. against 82 for Getz. But we did not notice much difference in the dynamics of the cars. Judging by the technical data, we are talking about 0.4 s, which cannot be detected without a stopwatch. But the fact that for the same reason Getz has a 10 km / h lower maximum speed can be seen. However, what a prudent person would rush on these crumbs at a speed of 176 km / h! Firstly, it’s scary, and secondly, at speeds above 140 km / h, in the first or in the second car, you can forget about comfort: it becomes too noisy due to poor sound insulation and structural features of the body.
In addition to these differences, there is one more, also related to the engine. Getz is able to be content with 92 gasoline, while power unit Aveo needs to be fed exclusively with 95th. This means that with the same volume of fuel tanks (45 liters), refueling Aveo will cost more. And this is provided that the fuel consumption of cars is almost the same.
They are similar in suspension and brakes. As a result, we also did not notice much difference in behavior on the road, except that Aveo is a little tougher. Another thing is the work of the CP. Getz pleased with excellent selectivity and clarity of inclusions. Aveo has a clear failure in these indicators. Gears are turned on reluctantly, it is difficult to find them out of habit, plus, often instead of reverse gear you can stick the first one: they are nearby.
And yet, despite minor flaws, Aveo will slightly “move” the uncrowned king of megacities. Moreover, the cars are very close in price: about $13,000 in a good configuration.
Technical Chevrolet specifications Aveo // Hyundai Getz
Body - 5-door hatchback
Curb weight, kg - 1085 // 1045
Full mass, kg - 1525 // 1530
Dimensions, mm:
- length 3880 // 3810
- width - 1670 // 1665
- height - 1495 // 1490
Base, mm - 2480 // 2455
Trunk volume, l - 220/980 // 254/1130
Max Speed, km/h – 176 // 166
Acceleration time to 100 km/h, s – 11.1 // 11.5
Control fuel consumption, l/100 km:
— city cycle – 8.6 // 8.8
— out-of-town – 6.1 // 5.3
- mixed - 7.0 // 6.4
Volume fuel tank, l - 45
Fuel brand - A-95 // A-92
Engine:
- type - gasoline, in-line, 4-cylinder
- working volume, cm3 - 1399 // 1341
— power, h.p. at min-1 - 94/6200 // 82/5500
- torque, Nm at min-1 - 130/3400 // 119/3200
Transmission - mechanical, 5-speed, front-wheel drive
Tire size - 185/60R14 // 175/65R14
Wheel suspension:
- front - independent: McPherson
- rear - semi-dependent, spring
Brakes (front / rear) - disc, ventilated / drum
Steering - "pinion-rack", with hydraulic booster
Price, $ – 12 850 // 12 790
What's better Hyundai Solaris or Chevrolet Aveo
For a long time on our site there were no articles about the battles between cars of the same class for the first places. For this reason, today we will consider two inexpensive, but very high-quality representatives of this family. Mandatory requirements for cars is the possession of an automatic transmission, economical modern engine and the latest developments in technical solutions, such as bluetooth and usb ports. It will be about Hyundai Solaris and Chevrolet Aveo. It is they who will fight for the championship in this article.
So, let's start with Hyundai Solaris. The body of this car is based on Hyundai Accent, but the forms are greatly improved. Very modern appearance, huge slick headlights, streamlined shape of the front of the body. A very unusual solution to the implementation of the front fog lights They look like boomerangs. The back of the body is sloping, but very attractive. If we talk about the quality of materials, then there are no complaints here, paintwork It is applied very high quality and it is not afraid of scratches from small stones. When closing the doors, there is no play and no rattling sound, it feels like you are closing a high-end car. Bumpers are made of high quality plastic, which is not damaged during frost. The car has a clearance of 166 millimeters, which is an excellent quality for the weather conditions in our country.
The interior of the car is very attractive, it is made of very high quality materials. The front seats have excellent lateral support. A long trip on such a car is very well tolerated. As for the number of passengers, only four will be comfortable in the Hyundai Solaris, since it will be crowded for three in the back seat. In addition, people with high growth (more than 185 centimeters) will rest their heads against the ceiling of the car.
But, despite all this, it is very comfortable inside the car, and especially in the version where there is climate control, an extended package (central armrest, additional speakers, mirrors and handles in body color, etc.). The only negative is the poor sound insulation inherent in all budget classes cars. You will still have to glue the bottom additionally yourself.
The Koreans put a really high-quality engine on the car, its project is called Gamma. In a relatively short time, he managed to prove himself exclusively on the positive side. To be more precise, the engine is dynamic, economical, does not create much noise, and even on the machine is able to accelerate the car to an impressive speed. The engine is made in two versions - it is 107 horsepower (1.4 liters) and 123 horsepower (1.6 liters). According to experts, the engine, which has a volume of 1.4 liters and a manual transmission, consumes 6.5 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers. We will not argue that the 1.6 liter engine will use a little more, and if an automatic machine is installed, the consumption will increase to about nine liters. But at the same time, the norm of ten liters per hundred kilometers in the urban cycle will not be exceeded. The manual transmission has five steps (but I already want to have six). And the automatic transmission in our time is generally a "dinosaur" - it has only four steps. But, in spite of everything, in combination with a 1.6 liter engine, it works flawlessly, without failures and jerks.
Suspensions, and especially the rear ones, on the very first Hyundai Solaris cars had big flaws. The car, even at low speed, could be taken off the road, and it was simply impossible to drive. But in modern versions of this car, this problem is solved and the car keeps the road perfectly. This was achieved thanks to the use of high-quality spare parts. It should be noted that this aspect is very important in the future for the maintenance of any car, both cars and trucks. The main thing is to find a good partner, a supplier of quality spare parts, like this, for example. Hyundai trim levels Solaris is a large number. It should be noted that the most minimal (without a stereo system and air conditioning) at mechanical box gears and a 1.4 liter engine will cost you approximately 445 thousand rubles. A car with the maximum configuration and a 1.6-liter engine costs 624 thousand rubles, and when installing the machine, you will have to add another 35 thousand. You can buy a car for 556 thousand rubles with complete set Optima, and several additional packages.
Let's move on to the second contender of our battles - Chevrolet Aveo. In 2012, the car was given a new body, and now it does not look as boring as it was before. The new look is more aggressive. With a shark-shaped hood and four headlights, the car has sporty look and smooth, if you look at it from the front, at 110%. But it is worth looking at him from behind, as the whole fuse immediately cools down. Its design, the headlights and their arrangement, are huge rear glass, all this does not enhance the beauty in any way. The feeling is that the design of the Chevrolet Aveo has not been fully finalized. In other words, the car is very beautiful from the front and terrible from the back. By painting the body, there are no complaints, it is painted wonderfully. Body gaps are also within acceptable limits, everything closes and works without problems. But there is one “but”, when the glass is lowered, a slight rattle is heard. During the closing of the doors, third-party sounds of vibration, either glass or trim, are heard, and this is a minus, this is not observed in Hyundai Solaris.
The front panel of the Chevrolet Aveo has the appearance of a motorcycle display, thereby hinting at youth style. The devices are illuminated in blue, you can even say neon blue. At first, it's even a little annoying, but after a couple of minutes the eyes get used to it. The backlight level controls are also located here, it can be made weaker or brighter. In general, the car's panel is not badly made, although it is made of hard plastic. There is a radio tape recorder, aux and usb inputs that are necessary in our time. Despite the monotony of the blue backlight, the readability of these devices is very good. But the interior door trim wants to be the best, Chevrolet Aveo, even with a high configuration, does not have a fabric coating - only plastic. The only advantage of the door trim is the separation of colors, which makes it original. Also on the panel, manufacturers have placed a large number of all kinds of glove compartments and pockets. By the way, it should be noted that there is a double glove compartment, a large compartment below, and a small one above.
The material from which the seats are made, as well as their lateral support, is slightly worse than that of the opponent. But in defense of Chevrolet Aveo, it is necessary to note the spaciousness of the cabin. The rear seats can comfortably accommodate three people. Therefore, Chevrolet loses to Hyundai in terms of trim, but wins in terms of spaciousness.
The Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with an ECOTEC 2 engine. Such engines are now installed on Opel Astra most latest generation. This is a fairly quiet motor with excellent elasticity, its operation in the cabin is absolutely inaudible. This class of car is equipped with engines with a volume of only 1.6 liters and a capacity of 115 horsepower. This is eight horsepower less than the opponent, but the economy is fuel consumption will be the same as Solaris.
The big plus of the Chevrolet Aveo is its modern six-speed automatic transmission, which works just fine. Acceleration of the car is gaining confidently and very quickly. The fuel economy of the six-speed automatic is much better than the four-speed gearbox. The machine works without jerks and shocks, the gear change is imperceptible.
car suspension Chevrolet Aveo works flawlessly, tram tracks and all sorts of small bumps are easily swallowed. On some turns the car may roll a little, but this is all within acceptable limits. If we talk about sound insulation, then, like Solaris, it is greatly lacking. This is probably hallmark all vehicles in this class. Another huge disadvantage of the Aveo is its rear drum brakes. We do not argue, of course, it is necessary to save, but not on your own safety, it's time to switch to disks. The next minus we note is incomprehensible information about car clearance. Official sources claim 160 mm clearance, but there is some rubber front overhang. This overhang hides 30 millimeters, as a result, 130 millimeters remain.
Perhaps the biggest plus of the Aveo is its cost. The price of its basic version starts from 444 thousand rubles. But in this configuration there is no air conditioning and automatic window lifting, but there is an audio system. In the next configuration, which costs 487 thousand rubles, front windows and air conditioning are already appearing. If we add here automatic box gears, the price of the car will increase to 520 thousand rubles. Well, the most maximum equipment, with a manual gearbox with cruise control, air conditioning, power windows on all windows and alloy wheels will cost 523 thousand. You will get the same with a machine gun for 556 thousand rubles.
Summarizing, one can see that Hyundai car Solaris won our battle by a wide margin. As you can see, the Chevrolet Aveo has not gained enough pluses, but it has enough minuses, these are ground clearance, rear brakes and lack of climate control. His opponent's disadvantage is a four-speed automatic and a higher price when maximum configuration. But at the same time, it should be noted that the maximum equipped Hyundai Solaris even has something that will never be supplied to Chevrolet Aveo.
This concludes our battle between Hyundai Solaris and Chevrolet Aveo. Visit our website and share your thoughts below.
In our country, small-class hatchbacks are for some reason considered purely female cars, so when I report that I am trying on Chevrolet Aveo and Hyundai Getz, people look at me either with distrust or with regret. The public template encourages me to buy a bigger car, something like Ford Focus or Honda Civic, because from the point of view of society, a man in a small car looks undignified, unnatural, wrong. Cars like the Renault Clio Sport and MINI Cooper are expensive exceptions that prove the rule.
But I never really cared about social stereotypes; especially to those who are devoid of common sense. And when choosing a car, common sense, it seems to me, should be the main guiding force. Of course, when buying any thing, one should not underestimate the role of the taste factor and externally Chevrolet Aveo seems to me more interesting than Hyundai Getz; but the aesthetic advantage of Chevrolet is not so great that I chose it, knowing that it is in some way fundamentally worse than Hyundai.
Why Chevrolet Aveo and Hyundai Getz? Because there are very few others modern cars small class, the owner of which can be for only 350,000 rubles. Say, employees of automobile newspapers earn little? Yes, perhaps, but this work gives a lot of other pleasant benefits. After all, not so little: if I wanted to, I could borrow a “real male car» a class above, but the more I learn about how the banking system works, the less I have the desire to get involved with it. And 350,000 rubles is the amount that is easy enough to save up without torturing yourself with debt obligations. Yes, and I don’t need a car of a higher class: I live in a metropolis of 20 million, I appreciate efficiency, compactness and maneuverability in cars, I rarely drive more than one passenger, I don’t have a summer cottage, I don’t suffer from Sunday shopping, I don’t go hunting and fishing.
For the indicated amount, both applicants appear, fortunately, not complete ascetics: one airbag, power steering, central locking, power windows and adjustable steering column have both cars. Then the nuances begin: Chevrolet, within the agreed budget, is richer in CD / MP3 audio system, ABS and air conditioning, but Hyundai has more powerful engine(1.4 l and 97 hp versus 1.2 l and 84 hp). For reference, we note that Getz can also be purchased with a 66-horsepower 1.1-liter engine for 292,900 rubles, but for myself I immediately rejected this option as too dreary - after all, the car should have some kind of dynamics.
The number of doors does not matter to me, so we deliberately chose the 3-door Aveo to pair with the 5-door Getz, especially since Aveo did not have such a body before the recent restyling - at the same time we will get acquainted with the new version.
In the town
In the city I live, work and rest, so my car willy-nilly is doomed to permanent ordeals in the capital's traffic. For a ragged cork rhythm, the Aveo's weightless clutch and "jelly" shifter fit perfectly, requiring almost no effort other than strong-willed; True, at first the grip seems completely uninformative, but you quickly get used to it and later thank you for the fact that the left leg never gets tired. The traction capabilities of the 1.2-liter engine are quite enough for confident acceleration in the entire range of urban speeds; lack of strength is felt only when climbing overpasses, and even then, if during the ascent you feel like overtaking someone, do not overtake and postpone the maneuver to the horizontal or descent.
The Aveo brake pedal is slightly heavier than the clutch, but the information content is an order of magnitude higher - dosing deceleration is easy and simple. Chassis confidently handles tram tracks and destruction of the road repair work- slowing down when overcoming them is caused by rather noisy suspension work than real shocks and vibrations. Visibility is also good, except that too small exterior rear-view mirrors can cause dissatisfaction; moreover, the right one does not have a reducing effect, which is why only a very small part of the events occurring behind the car can be seen in it.
The Getz exterior mirrors are larger and give a more natural look to the eye, with overtaking and lane changes no problem. A more powerful 1.4-liter engine is more pleasant in sharp maneuvers, but in crawling modes, power manifests itself only in fuel consumption, which, of course, is not at all encouraging. The clutch is tight, the gears are engaged precisely and with noticeable effort, which creates a feeling of a solid and reliable car, but in a traffic jam, the excessive elasticity of the controls quickly starts to tire, you want more lightness - maybe it will develop over time? There are no complaints about the brakes, but in comparison with the Aveo, it seems that they almost lack information content. Hyundai's suspension is noticeably quieter than the rival's, and works out small bumps in the roadway a little better.
In general, both cars proved to be worthy in an urban environment, complicating the driver's life only with small “jambs” like small exterior mirrors from Aveo and tight controls from Getz, for which they lost the highest rating.
In the country
Although rarely and without much enthusiasm, I still go out of town - there is such an industrial and everyday necessity. Chevrolet Aveo quite conscientiously endures a long journey, demonstrating a good exchange rate stability and unexpectedly cheerful dynamics. Up to 140 km / h, a 1.2-liter engine accelerates a light car quite confidently, and it seemed that this was far from the limit and passport 170 was quite achievable.
On a more or less high-quality highway, the Aveo rolls lullingly smoothly; the palette of noises is dominated by the wind, and its uniform rumble, with all the desire, can hardly be called uncomfortable. Acoustic troubles arise only on broken roads, which the Aveo suspension works out, as they say, without embarrassment in expressions and scares the crew with squeaks and rumbles.
Hyundai Getz is more tolerant of bad asphalt and generally seems more comfortable under any conditions, but, frankly, if you test both cars with your ears closed, you may not notice a difference in ride between them. Where the Getz is unequivocally superior is in overtaking at high speed - thanks to a more powerful engine that allows you to make most of the maneuvers without fiddling with the gear lever.
Both cars are not prohibited from driving down the dirt road: although their ground clearance is far from the record levels in the class, but with careful driving, these kids will be able to master more than a dozen kilometers of country roads without damage to the body and units located in the area of the bottom. However, in terms of the sum of impressions, the Hyundai Getz seems to be more adapted for out-of-town trips: it has better sound insulation and a more temperamental engine on its side.
Controllability
Both vehicles, despite Korean origin, chassis settings demonstrate the classic European upbringing: precise steering, slight understeer with excess speed at the entrance to the turn, moderate rolls and quite effective brakes. Even with modest engines, they are able to please the gambling driver with overloads on a winding country highway. But I don’t consider myself a gambling driver, and in these cars I’m more impressed with the confidence that they inspire with their behavior than the ultimate cornering capabilities.
If not for poor equipment active safety, then it would be possible to give Aveo and Getz the highest marks for handling, but, alas, it turned out that in the basic configurations they don’t even have ABS, and ESP is not installed in principle - an unheard-of negligence towards buyers by European standards.
Ergonomics and comfort
I have repeatedly noticed that most people, when they sit behind the wheel of any new car for the first time, immediately begin to feel the plastic of the instrument panel, as if this is the main thing that interests them in the car. Personally, I’m not going to sleep on the instrument panel and I’m not interested in its hardness / softness, but if you think that the so-called soft, but in fact just a little pliable under finger pressure, plastic will cause you less bodily injury during emergency contact, then I don’t I will convince you: I have always respected the "feelings of believers." What is really important to me in the interior of the car is a comfortable fit and good ergonomics. With landing at Aveo, everything is fine: it was possible to find the optimal adjustment of the driver's seat very quickly, and not only for me, but also for colleagues of a different height and physique. And with ergonomics, the 3-door hatchback got an unpleasant puncture: the central pillars of the body are located far behind the front seats, so it’s very inconvenient to reach for the seat belts hanging on them, you have to turn your whole body towards them. In addition, too small exterior mirrors strain the driver, which, of course, does not make the trip more comfortable. The design of the central tunnel also raises questions: of course, thanks to the developers for two storage niches, but for some reason the only cup holder is located behind the front seats, so it is extremely difficult for the driver and navigator to use it. In addition, the diameter and depth of the cup holder is such that it is more suitable for carrying cans than drinks.
The passage to the back seat, as in all 3-door hatchbacks, is associated with light acrobatics, but sitting there is quite comfortable, only too low head restraints are embarrassing.
It's nice that already in the basic configuration Aveo is equipped with a proprietary audio system that supports MP3 format. The large head unit looks very solid, but the sound quality is expected to be mediocre, and if the high and mid frequencies are reproduced more or less believably, then the quality of the low frequencies cannot be determined due to the lack thereof. However, I saw twice and three times more expensive cars, where the sound was worse than in the Aveo. These, alas, include the test Hyundai Getz, equipped with an aftermarket JVC audio system with a loud but monstrously dirty sound. A regular audio system for cars of Russian specification is not provided at all, so the future owner of Getz in any case will have to spend money on equipment; the only nice thing is that in this case you can achieve really good sound.
Getting behind the wheel of the Getz seemed to me quite comfortable, but the taller experts experienced inconvenience, as you can clearly see by watching our video on the site. But the space around the driver is designed more competently than in Aveo: there are three cupholders on the central tunnel (two small ones for tea / coffee and one large and deep one for a large bottle), and the door lock keys are logically located along with handles for opening them. In motion, Getz pleases with a low noise level and is generally perceived by passengers as more comfortable car, for which he receives a slight advantage in points over the Aveo.
Practicality
The hatchback type body assumes the presence of a folding rear seat, allowing you to carry large items in the car, like a pair of Vestax turntables and a mixer for private parties that we like to throw with friends. In both cars, not only the backrest is folded, but also the seat, leaving a deep niche for luggage with a flat floor of a conditionally square perimeter. But if at Getz the seat is completely folded in a ratio of 2:1, then at Aveo only the back is divided into parts, which, of course, limits the passenger-and-freight variability of the cabin. In addition, in the initial position, the Aveo trunk is slightly smaller in volume than the Getz - 220 VDA-liters versus 254. However, in the overwhelming majority of cases, I don’t need a trunk at all, but for the sake of objectivity, I have to give Getz a higher rating for practicality.
conclusions
The winner of this comparative test, as you might guess, was the Hyundai Getz, who did not lose a single round to the opponent. On the Getz side and slightly lower insurance and maintenance costs. Of course, a more powerful engine will require a little more frequent visits to gas stations, but its appetite, with all the desire, can hardly be called ruinous.
From myself, I can add that the advantage of Getz over Aveo cannot be called overwhelming, it has developed from a combination of nuances, the importance of which is far from obvious to everyone. Including for me. The noise level in the Aveo doesn’t bother me much, I don’t give a damn about the less convenient trunk, but the small exterior mirrors and the far-hanging seat belt confuse me. The problem with the belt is solved by buying a 5-door version instead of a 3-door one (5000 rubles more expensive on average), and the mirrors can become, so to speak, an object of visual tuning. In addition, I am attracted to Aveo design, easy controls and the best equipment within the planned budget. So I don't even know what to choose. The classic situation in the style of "shoemaker without boots." It seems that I know everything about cars, but I find it difficult to make an unambiguous choice. Maybe I'll flip a coin. In any case, I won't guess.
Hello, ladies and gentlemen motorists!!!
For a long time I did not write anything about my car. Aveo is more and more on the streets of Ufa, despite the fact that my equipment (LTZ) has risen in price by 80 thousand rubles since September 2012.
I spent the whole of 2013 on business trips, traveled a little, the mileage today is just over 24,000 km. First things first, about the trip, about which he promised to write, but somehow his hands did not reach.
Strengths:
- Most safe car B-class in the Russian market
- Excellent road behavior - handling and ride
Weak sides:
- High gas mileage
- Tendency to get stuck in snow and off-road
Review Chevrolet Aveo (T200) (Chevrolet Aveo) 2004
So, back in 2005, my parent decided to buy a personal car. For a future purchase, perhaps the only, but very difficult requirement was presented - to have an automatic transmission. It is now that every stool has a complete set with two pedals, but then everything was not so simple. That is, there were machines, but not in the segment budget sedans, to which the eyes of the merchant were first turned. I must say that the available amount in the region of 15,000 USD. it was enough to buy a decent C-class for those times, such as Ford Focus I or Mitsu Lancer IX, which I strongly drew my father's attention to. But with these two, it somehow did not work out at once, as with others. I understood the reason later. So, we couldn’t feel the trick, we watched the Lancer, the sonata, something else, I don’t remember already. Moreover, his father constantly repeated that all these cars were small for him, Aveo was bigger! Yes, in my understanding, a height of 184 cm can already impose restrictions on the size of the car, but when comparing the Sonata and Aveo, the choice should be obvious!
In general, all the way to the Chevrolet salon, I proved to him that class B cannot be more than C, which for him was an absolutely empty sound. In general, we were then much less literate in the automotive sense. I was very upset, realizing that I could not prevent the mistake. The frustration intensified when I saw this in front of me. Yes, she is small! And inside? Op-pa! This is where I slowly began to understand. It's really spacious behind the wheel. My father’s funny argument, that I can ride in a hat in winter and not support the ceiling, was actually quite serious. The high roof, higher than other sedans, contributes to this. In addition, due to the height, the area of \u200b\u200bglazing increases, so there is a lot of light in the cabin. Light gray plastic also adds a sense of spaciousness. Flat and thin doors, like a Matiz, make the interior wider. The classic phrase that the inside of the car seems larger than the outside is quite appropriate here. It really is.
Strengths:
- Reliability
- Simplicity of design
Weak sides:
- Taxiing (conditionally)
- Legacy Security
Review Chevrolet LTZ (Chevrolet Aveo) 2012 Part 3
Hello dear!
I am writing another review because there is a reason: it has recently been a year since I bought my car.
Mileage for the year amounted to 17,000 km. I calculated that out of 365 days that have passed since the purchase of the car, 120 days I was on business trips or on vacation abroad when I did not use the car. Thus, on average, the car mileage was 69.4 km per day.
Strengths:
- I want to go further after 1 year of operation — this is important!
Weak sides:
- Gasoline consumption is the biggest downside.
Review Chevrolet LTZ (Chevrolet Aveo) 2012 Part 2
Good day, dear visitors of the Automarket!
It so happened that I bought a car on 09/27/2012, I rode it for a couple of weeks, and then went on a business trip, returned, another week and left again. Therefore, most of the run is on winter roads. I understand that 8 thousand is not a reason to write a review, but if it were not for business trips, I would have hit more.
I come - it's winter in Ufa. The car has already been converted to winter wheels R15. Tires are Dunlop. Leaving the garage — here I was waiting for the first surprise! Only the wheels were on the snow, the car began to slip! This has never happened to any of my VAZ cars. The snow is almost cleared, nothing should interfere. In a misunderstanding, I walked around my car, dug up the front wheels - the car is still skidding. And you can’t skid - automatic transmission! I turn on the manual mode, then the neighbor in the garage drove up in time - he pushed me out with some difficulty (with his hands). Back to the garage. The snow had to be cleared literally down to the asphalt.
Strengths:
- A modern car that is sold even in the US market
- Good price/option combination
Weak sides:
- High fuel consumption
- Inadequate lighting control system with light sensor
- Poorly adapted for the Russian winter (stove, cross-country ability)