Portal for car enthusiasts

Comparison of Nissan Patrol and Toyota 200. Comparative test of Nissan Patrol, Toyota Land Cruiser - "Battle of the Titans"

For lovers of large vehicles, which are SUVs, today it is not an easy task to choose, because modern sales offices are literally full of a variety of vehicles in this segment. Quite recently, Russian motorists were introduced new model, which quite quickly gathered a number of its fans.

Strong competitor

It is hard to believe that this representative of this class of vehicles was a joyful discovery for the owners of Nissan, because by that time not a single device of the concern could match the characteristics of the presented car. This was one of the reasons for the creation of a fundamentally new development, which was called. This SUV received a new distinction as an independent suspension. In order to help potential buyers make an informed decision on the choice between the presented cars, a series of comparative characteristics.

Differences in equipment

The latest version of the Nissan Patrol was created by developers with the goal of surpassing the Toyota Land Cruiser 200 in most of the available SUV characteristics. As a result, the car was created with superior dimensions in order to look more spectacular than a competitor already at the start. In addition, it has a large mass of 160 extra pounds, and the power of its engine exceeds its opponent by 96 Horse power. As a result, Land Cruiser against the backdrop of a new Nissan models turned out to be a smaller model.

The situation was somewhat corrected by a new wave of restyling, as a result of which the updated Toyota acquired new bumpers, as well as a different shape of the radiator grille. In addition, the changes affected the repeaters of turns, as well as rear-view mirrors. There were more chrome elements in the decoration of the body, and the front and rear optics acquired LED elements. Although the overall appearance of the car retained its shape, after restyling, the model received a more modern appearance.

The off-road equipment of the updated Land Cruiser has also acquired new qualities thanks to the Crawl Control system, which has the ability to maintain a set speed without driver intervention. Now in the arsenal of the SUV there are 5 speed modes, and cameras have also appeared that allow for all-round visibility. This quality allows not only better control of the situation on the road, while driving, but is also able to provide assistance during parking.

The latest Nissan Patrol model has not yet been restyled, retaining the same features acquired back in 2010. However, the model takes a more attractive position in pricing, having a cost of 2,995 thousand rubles against 3,325 thousand rubles for updated version Land cruiser.

Specification Differences

Gasoline engines, which are available on both models, allow the owner to take advantage of a series of excellent qualities. For lovers of speed and travel in areas where the full range of SUV capabilities can be useful, the model will be more preferable. Nissan engine Patrol. This is an 8-cylinder V-shaped engine with a volume of 5.6 liters and a power of 405 horsepower. Acceleration time to 100 km per hour this engine is 6.6 seconds, which makes it similar in acceleration characteristics to sports models.

Toyota Land Cruiser 200 has a more modest power unit, the volume of which is exactly one liter less than that of the opponent, and the engine power this vehicle down 100 horsepower. Lower power characteristics were reflected in the acceleration time to 100 km per hour, which amounted to 8.6 seconds.

Thus, the Nissan Patrol outperformed its competitor in terms of dynamic performance, however, with its fuel consumption of 25-30 liters per 100 km, when driving in urban areas, it lost a lot in terms of economy. Land Cruiser turned out to be a more economical model, which is important for car enthusiasts who do not use the car for difficult voyages.

Both presented models are equipped with automatic transmissions, however, the Nissan Patrol is equipped with a 7-speed gearbox, while the Land Cruiser has only a 6-speed system in the arsenal. At the same time, the 7-speed Checkpoint Nissan boasts a completely insignificant delay during the start, in addition, all steps are performed in a more hidden mode from the driver. In the characteristics of the Land Cruiser gearbox, a clear delay during the start can be noted, and there may also be delays during emergency braking.

Differences in patency

For a detailed comparison running characteristics presented cars, it is necessary to place them in equally difficult conditions. For example, if you choose the sands of the United Arab Emirates or the deserts of Saudi Arabia as a testing ground, then the Nissan Patrol will be the undisputed favorite here. This rod will prove its superiority within 10 minutes due to its higher power and recoil ability.

But the thing is that for consumers of domestic markets, this quality will not serve as a decisive link at all. Here, more attention is paid to the behavior of the car in conditions of snowy ruts or in marshy areas, which are more similar to roads washed out by floods during the off-season. And then a paradoxical discovery pops up, it turns out that the almighty Nissan, among other off-road programs, is not familiar with the concept of “dirt”.

System versatility

When it comes to the functionality of the installed systems, it is not at all difficult to compare the characteristics of both presented cars. Here, the constructive decisions taken by the developers during the creation of their models come to the fore. The Toyota Land Cruiser 200 has undeniably great features that allow it to handle most off-road challenges.

But the location of the switches on the control panel of this SUV has an extremely inconvenient order. A poorly adjusted position does not allow the driver to react instantly, especially if he does not have much experience in difficult sections of the road. In contrast, the Nissan Patrol has a two-stage washer, which is responsible for all available systems that provide flotation on various sections of the track.

Technical tricks

Do not forget that each SUV has to spend a lot of time within the city limits, where systems will come to the aid of the driver to help manage in these conditions. For example, the Nissan Patrol's tooling includes a very useful top-down view of the street, which is displayed on the control panel monitor. Such an upgrade is possible due to the installation of 4 surveillance cameras around the perimeter, opening a view from all sides. This quality becomes very useful in a dense mode of movement of a large car on busy city streets. Also, this quality is very convenient when parking in a limited space.

Land Cruiser equipment has four seasonal climate control, which has a lot of convenient adjustments that allow you to create a comfortable microclimate. Additional option seat heating also seems to be a very useful feature especially in winter.

Advantages and disadvantages of the presented models

Despite the common purpose, both presented cars have learned quite different positive and negative qualities, allowing them to acquire their own supporters. Each car has its own strengths and weaknesses, which are often opposed to each other.

Toyota Land Cruiser 200

Advantages:

  • high reliability, ensuring confident movement in various conditions;
  • comfortable season, providing profitable terms microclimate at any time of the year;
  • high permeability provided by many systems;
  • high liquidity rate, regulated by the demand for used cars.

Disadvantages:

  • inconvenient arrangement of switches for systems that provide patency;
  • low quality paintwork;
  • high percentage of theft.

Nissan Patrol

Advantages:

  • large dimensions of the trunk, allowing you to store a lot of useful equipment at hand;
  • comfortable salon;
  • lighter level of control;
  • high permeability;
  • high quality optics.

Disadvantages:

  • not high quality finishing materials;
  • high fuel consumption;
  • whimsical power windows.

conclusions

If you critically approach the comparison of the various characteristics of both presented cars, then you can establish which model managed to achieve superiority and in what parameters. It becomes obvious that the Nissan Patrol model has managed to achieve complete superiority in dynamic performance due to higher power characteristics of your engine. As for the comfort of the interior space and handling characteristics, there are no clear favorites here.

It is also worth noting the characteristics of pricing. Today, Nissan Patrol, for all its weight, will cost an average of 100 thousand rubles cheaper than a similar version of the Toyota Land Cruiser 200. In addition, it should be borne in mind that the significant fuel consumption of the Nissan Patrol can be significant inconvenience in operation, given current fuel prices, that don't get any cheaper.

Choosing a crossover is an important matter, if you take into account the cost of such a car. Moreover, now they offer a large number of different vehicles. Among such a variety it is difficult to give preference to a particular model, but somehow it is necessary to decide.

If you want to understand what will be better: Patrol or Land Cruiser 200, our article will help you make the final decision.

If you want to compare Nissan Patrol and Land Cruiser 200, then you should start with the most important - technical features models. It is worth noting that technical indicators not too different here. Both vehicles are equipped with a V8 engine, as a result, fords up to 70 centimeters deep do not cause any difficulties in overcoming. In addition, the standard equipment both there and there involves front and rear disc brake mechanism. True, Nissan has more ground clearance (27.5 centimeters compared to 22.5 cm).

But to be objective when choosing a Nissan Patrol or Land Cruiser 200, it is worth noting that the first car somewhat outperforms the first. First of all, here it is worth dwelling on the size of the engine. At Nissan, it is as much as 5.5 liters, while at Kruzak it is 4.6 (which is also quite powerful). The transmission is also different.

The dynamics of both cars is simply excellent (with their dimensions!), but even here Nissan overtook its Japanese competitor. Patrol takes a hundred in 6.6 seconds, while Toyota can develop a similar speed in only 8.6 seconds. And the maximum acceleration is 210 and 205 kilometers, respectively.

Video test drive and Nissan comparison Patrol and Toyota Land Cruiser 200:

As a result, this also affected the fuel consumption figures. The 200 Land Cruiser model is somewhat more economical. In mixed mode, it will need 13.6 liters, while for the analogue from the Nissan brand, it needs as much as 14.6 liters under the same driving conditions.

What makes Toyota different

Before you find out which is better: Nissan Patrol or Land Cruiser 200, it is worth evaluating the features of each vehicle. And we will begin our description with a representative of the Toyota concern. We can say with confidence that almost everyone has a dream to buy just such a car. Especially when it comes to a presentable Land Cruiser 200, well, or at least RAV4.

Until now, manufacturers are proud of their offspring, and for good reason. After all, both the exterior and interior of the car are just perfect, any changes can damage the decor.

This car model is in the halo of mysticism - probably, if you improve the vehicle, adding a little controllability and comfort, as well as equipping it with an independent suspension and a number of other fashionable elements, it may lose its charm.

On the other hand, even now the car behaves just fine. The car turned out to be strong, reliable, it can easily overcome almost any impassability. This is also confirmed by the mass of ratings, where Toyota has practically no worthy competitors among other SUVs.

A few words about Nissan

But the strengths in the battle of the Nissan Patrol against the Land Cruiser 200 are not only the second car. In general, the very process of creating the model is most likely due to the fact that the automaker did not have a worthy competitor to the LC 200.

As a result, the new Patrol came out larger and more massive than previous counterparts. The car is distinguished by its monumental interior. At the same time, all design decisions related to the design of the body are not reflected in any way on the spaciousness of the cabin.

Interior Features

It is difficult to choose between the Nissan Patrol or the Toyota Land Cruiser 200 in terms of roominess and spaciousness inside. At first glance, it may seem that the LC 200 is smaller, as it is more compact in appearance. At the same time, both according to experts and owners, the driver and passengers feel comfortable in both cars.

In the Nissan Patrol, the rear seats are slightly higher than those of the Cruiser. At the same time, there is a full-fledged third row that can be folded, which significantly increases capacity. At the same time, in Kruzak, the chairs move to the sides. In fact, the LC 200 lags behind in terms of trunk. But he overlaps this card with the fact that it is better to sleep in Toyota. This is especially true for fishermen and hunters. During sleep, you don’t have to curl up there, there is enough space. In addition, the Cruiser's trunk is equipped with a hinged door, which allows you to carry long items, like skis.

Whatever model the future car owner chooses, the vehicle will be equipped with a spacious refrigerator between the front seats. But in Nissan, the lid of the device is bidirectional, so even passengers who are located behind can use the refrigerator.

Continuing to choose: Nissan Patrol or Toyota Land Cruiser 200, it is worth emphasizing that the latter car is equipped with a number of newfangled features, including:

  • ventilation of the front seats;
  • steering wheel heating;
  • four-zone climate control.

At the same time, passengers can also control such climate control. Competing Nissan is not far behind. Among the advantages of the model are adaptive cruise control, as well as monitors built into the headrests.

In fact, it is impossible to objectively assess which is better: Patrol or Land Cruiser. True, lovers of conservatism will suit the second car, and there is more comfort and coziness. But Nissan, on the other hand, is distinguished by its artsy curves and massive trim, which adds originality to it.

Features of power units

We have already compared: Nissan Patrol or Land Cruiser 100 technical specifications, but now let's dwell on this in more detail. Powerful engines allow you to put Nissan along with modern sports cars, because even they do not always gain a hundred in 6.6 seconds.

In principle, you can not want more from such an engine. In the case of the Cruiser, everything is somewhat simpler, because the engine volume is almost a liter less, and the power in horses is a whole hundred behind. On the other hand, we have two options:

  • Nissan is more powerful, faster, faster;
  • The LC 200 is more economical (for example, to feed the Patrol you need about 25-30 liters of gasoline when driving around the city).

Paired with the engine is an exclusively automatic gearbox, while the transmission also has a manual mode.

True, it is important to say that Toyota is equipped with a much more efficient braking system. Despite this, during braking, the car leans forward, in the case of Patrol, it also leads to the side.

For many motorists, the choice between Toyota Land Cruiser or Nissan Patrol is obvious, since the latter option has an independent suspension. But in practice, driving both vehicles is not so easy, although you can completely forget about various bumps in the road - even large pits and potholes are easily absorbed by the suspension.

Several outperforms Toyota and steering. It completely allows you to forget about all the vibrations, and the feedback with directional stability is on the level here. Nissan Patrol, on the other hand, has its own trump card - it has practically no lateral rolls, even on fairly sharp turns.

Permeability level

If we were talking about the conditions of Africa, where everything is covered with sand, then there could be no doubt about the leader - Nissan would have bypassed its competitor in 10 minutes. At the same time, in Russia it is hardly possible to find a track completely made of sand. Basically, the problem is mud, swampy terrain, as well as snow marks. However, the Patrol does not have a “dirt” program, although there are many others designed for off-road driving.

Multifunctionality of the device system

And here it is easy to compare cars. Although the Land Cruiser 200 has great functionality that allows you to overcome off-road, it is not so easy for the driver to reach the control system. Switching buttons quickly is difficult, especially if you rarely have to do this. But Nissan's two-stage washer, which is responsible for all the off-road systems present, is very convenient to use.

Though ground clearance Toyota has less, it handles road breaks better. On the other hand, even if the bottom of the Patrol crosses out the road surface, it is almost impossible to damage the car in this way, since all systems are hidden and are much higher than the frame.

Of the main disadvantages of vehicles, it is worth noting the poor patency on soft ground. Cars are massive, so they sag easily. An inexperienced driver can drive the vehicle in such a way that it will have to be pulled out with a powerful tractor.

Small technical tricks

As a rule, people who purchase such crossovers use them not only off-road, but also in urban areas.

For Patrol owners it is important to know about one feature of the car, with which you can observe the street from above.

Thanks to the display of all four cameras on the screen, it will be possible to comprehensively assess the situation on the road and make the right decision during parking and other maneuvers.

What do we get as a result

So, if you want to choose Patrol or Land Cruiser 100 (or the two hundredth model), then it is difficult to knock out an unambiguous result. After a thorough assessment of cars, we can say that Patrol is the spiritual heirs of Toyota, but it surpasses its counterpart solely in terms of dynamics and cross-country ability. But in terms of comfort and handling, the cars are on the same level.

As a rule, Toyota LC 200 is preferred by people who are bigger and smoother, but Nissan is a great choice for those who like fast driving, fast acceleration and original decor. At the same time, it should be borne in mind that Kruzak will cost an order of magnitude more expensive - the most expensive Nissan is cheaper by 100 thousand of the basic Toyota equipment.

Video of choice: which is better Nissan Patrol or Land Cruiser 200:

Greetings to all readers and writers of reviews! I myself periodically read the opinions of others about their iron friends.

The track record of the fleet began, like many of my peers and older, with the VAZ-2106. White and as far as I can remember, before each trip I looked under the hood, sometimes out of habit. Then Honda-integra, Mercedes, trade winds, Volga-3110)), Toyota Surf, from this model I realized that only Toyota can survive in our post-Soviet spaces. Then there was Camry, Lexus RX, Prado150…. about all the cars left a good impression, especially about the 150 SUV with the landing of a passenger car.

At next shift the car had a choice: a supported 200 or a new Prado150, but after the 200th hundredth color of white pearl appeared before the eyes of the wife ... I didn’t want to return to the car that the family had already driven.

Strengths:

  • Reliability

Weak sides:

  • High tax and expense

Review of Toyota Land Cruiser 200 4.7i V8 (Toyota Land Cruiser) 2008

This is the third time I'm starting to write a review about my LK 200 ... Each time I embark on lengthy reasoning and philosophizing. Although, perhaps you want to see something else. You want to see the bare facts: how much to eat, how much maintenance costs, how to park, etc. Trying to understand why? Why can't I just list all its advantages and disadvantages and give advice to the buyer? The answer is not immediately found, and it is not so obvious, but still ... LK changed me, changed me qualitatively. I bought this car simply because I had the opportunity to buy myself a second car for the winter (the first one is a Chevrolet Camaro, you can read the reviews). With all its obvious merits, I could not imagine that LK would ever force Chevrolet Camaro out of my heart. It's so different cars, in style, in spirit ... And the point is not that one is worse than the other. At the same time, the fact remains, as they say, you can’t command the heart. The Chevrolet Camaro will most likely be sold soon, not because I'm bad with money, but simply because in the morning I want to sit in the LC, and not in the Camaro. Although they are standing outside the window ... Choose what you want. But first things first…

I bought a car, as always, spontaneously. I went to the car portal, found the most cheap option, called and went to watch. The owner of the Kruzak, a nice man with the surname Vesely, was the complete opposite of his surname. Outwardly, I liked the car, signed up for diagnostics. Dialogue with the service manager:

“The car is in excellent condition. But I must warn you, the next MOT after 4000 km (at 85,000) is quite expensive.

Strengths:

  • Reliability
  • Liquidity

Weak sides:

  • Theft

Review Toyota Land Cruiser 200 4.7i V8 (Toyota Land Cruiser) 2011

Hello everyone, I recently bought a Cruiser, so this review contains more emotions and comments than any important information.

In early December of this year, Toyota Land Cruiser 200, 4.7, anniversary version was purchased. Chose for a short time. Although that's how to say it. Before that, I went to the Prado-120, I thought about changing it a year ago, but somehow I didn’t have to. And then the amount of money appeared, and I began to choose. I wanted a new car as soon as possible, but the speed was by no means explained by the desire for a new car, but rather by the security of the amount of money that appeared so unexpectedly. And I was afraid because, being in a state of intoxication, I almost bought a Cadillac Escalade 4-year-old with a hybrid engine, in the neighboring city of Novosibirsk, no, thanks. Prado is not something that would not suit, no, everything was fine, but he was already somehow fed up with it, and, given the mileage of 180 thousand, the wallet was noticeably worried, because it costs up to 200 thousand from the officials to sort out pneuma from the Prado. But it is much more pleasant to invest these 200 thousand in a new car.

So, money 3 kopecks million, began to choose.

Strengths:

  • Comfort
  • Prestige
  • Driving performance (barge, damn it!)
  • Security (perhaps?)

Toyota Land Cruiser in a comparison test? It's like United Russia in the upcoming elections: no matter what I write, it won't change the sales balance. At the end of last year, when the updated 200-series SUV appeared, the Land Cruiser diverged twenty times better than new chevrolet Tahoe, and Nissan Patrol, which survived restyling a year and a half ago, bought thirty times worse. Wherever you look — entirely Kruzaki. An endless march of consonants along the avenues of megacities: in order to become popular, frame SUV Russia doesn't need mud or sand.

L and Cruiser to update - only to spoil. This is not me telling you, but the chief designer of the SUV, Sadayoshi Koyari. As soon as you bring up the topic of technical conservatism of the design, Koyari-san replies that the customers demand it. No hybrids and independent suspensions, and without a frame, the Land Cruiser will not remain in the next generation.

On the right is the legendary Land Cruiser 70 series with non-original portal bridges. The model recently celebrated its thirtieth anniversary and is still produced in Japan with an atmospheric diesel engine 4.2 (131 hp) and a gasoline engine 4.0 (228 hp). The new "seventy" at the "gray" dealers costs almost four million rubles. Beyond the Urals, demand is stable - the Russian representative office is seriously considering the start of official deliveries of these all-terrain vehicles

Ironically, I ran into one of those for whom the Japanese engineer works on my way to an interview. A small “tail” of cars at the entrance to the Luzhniki sports complex: you need to stop and open the trunk for inspection. Here the Skoda is leaving, standing in front of me, I turn on the first gear, I drive off - and immediately I hit the brake: after driving around the line, a white Land Cruiser wedged in front of me. From such impudence I was confused, although the right words were found by themselves.

True, it was a pre-styling SUV. And if we assume that the driver's behavior is influenced by the appearance of the car, then now there will be fewer such situations. Hippo amusingly rounded his cheeks, smiled and summed up the LED headlight eyesshiny arrows. With the opening of the locks, the illumination of the thresholds flares up. The situation inside has hardly changed since 2007, when the “two hundredth” appeared, but the decor matches the positioning of the car and its price more than ever: almost five million rubles for the top version with a diesel engine. The skin is softer, the gloss is brighter, the pile is thicker. There is now more light inside: the floor is flooded with a white-moon glow, the nightlights on the door upholstery are comfortably smoldering. The breakwater of the center console meets the knee with a lush leather overlay.


Modernizations do not change the main thing: the Land Cruiser is still comfortable on broken roads and is capable of much off asphalt

Alas, the chair is still simple, with a flat and short pillow. But the instrument panel is like your Lexus. Each scale has a dial with a powerful bezel ring. But the resounding central screen, constantly clogged with messages about the status of electronic assistants, pressed the main instruments - through the palisade of risks you can’t immediately understand the meaning of speed. The solid discs of the audio system rotate nobly, like the shaft encoders on Japanese cassettes of the eighties. Not far from those times, the shell of the multimedia system has also gone. Is it really that hard to draw a decent menu?


The solidity of the Toyota interior is emphasized by massive handrails on the racks and huge door handles.
The cut of the seat is wide and the leather is slippery. Due to the short pillow, the hips hang without support and get tired. Large box in the armrest, like the rest of the cars in the trio, with cooling


Beautiful design with a glossy finish is very easily soiled. Behind the cover at the bottom of the console is a deep compartment for small items.
Nice to meet you in modern car pointer indicators of oil pressure and voltage in the on-board network. But the central scales are overloaded with risks, and on the color screen a lot of information is displayed small and in one line.


An unusual icon on the middle key in the top row means that the particulate filter is burning. The system starts automatically with uniform movement at highway speeds, but if you do not leave the city for a long time, then periodically you need to press this button. Please note that the headlight washer is switched on separately from the main
Boost button idling, Toyota has always had it, and the latest update brought a dangerous proximity alarm

0 / 0

But updating the interior and electronics was the main vector of re-tailing. Land Cruiser in the maximum configuration with a bilingual name The Safety Suite is equipped with adaptive cruise control (it works after 40 km/h), reads road signs, monitors the driver's work regime, and in case of an accident, he activates the brakes himself. True, only a speed reduction of 15 km / h was promised. It seems that the systems were introduced for show: most of them are useless in Russian realities.

Although the Land Cruiser itself is irreplaceable.


In addition to the keys on the center console, Toyota's microclimate can be adjusted in one of the menu tabs

But not in the metropolis or its environs. I sincerely do not envy people who drive this SUV around Moscow every day. Despite the fact that the Land Cruiser has never been so polished, you get tired of it in the city. Governing them is like escorting home a tipsy friend. It doesn't hold a straight line very well, changes direction reluctantly, bows at every braking, and falls on its side pretty much in corners. Because it was made for someone else!

On a dead grader or departmental winter road, the Land Cruiser opens up. Shock absorbers of long-travel suspensions breathe with a full rod, it goes like a cleaver over bumps rear axle, and the good ribeye-thick front arms are ready to endure it indefinitely. Spit on the smeared handling and tight steering wheel in the parking lot, but the energy intensity and smoothness of the ride - you will envy.

Fans of huge ones, which are called SUVs, have a very difficult time. Among the wide range of various models presented in the salons, it is quite difficult to choose your optimal car. Most recently, a brand new Toyota Land Cruiser 200 appeared before the Russians in all its glory, which in a short time was able to gather its circle of admirers. It cannot be said that the novelty greatly pleased the Nissan concern, since at that time this automaker did not have a single model that could be on the same level as the Land Cruiser. The Nissan Infiniti QX 56 and Patrol Y61, previously developed by design engineers, could not surpass the comfortable car from Toyota. True, soon before potential consumers appeared new nissan Patrol, the main advantage of which was the introduction of an independent suspension. In the article below, we will try to compare Nissan Patrol and Land Cruiser 200, choose the most comfortable, maneuverable and convenient car.

Comparison of specifications

Let's start right away with those properties that are identical for both vehicles. First of all, it is worth noting the power unit - both cars have a V8 engine type, a drive type (4WD), a fording depth (70 cm), front and rear disc brakes.

Nissan Patrol, in comparison with the Toyota Land Cruiser 200, has slightly superior performance in terms of displacement (5552 cm versus 4608), engine output (405/309), maximum torque, automatic transmission (7 gearboxes versus 6 gearboxes), ground clearance (275 / 225), acceleration to 100 km / h (6.6 / 8.6), speed (210/205), fuel tank capacity (100/93). True, no matter how good the Nissan Patrol is, the Toyota Land Cruiser surpasses it in fuel consumption. If the first absorbs 14.5 liters in the combined cycle, then the second - 13.6 liters.

"National" features of the TLC 200

Despite the fact that the majority of Russians confidently purchase medium-sized and nearest suburban roads (while female representatives are increasingly choosing maneuverable compact small cars), many people have a desire to “manage the dream” from the Toyota concern.

The object of this very desire is most often a presentable Land Cruiser 200 or, in extreme cases, RAV4. The developers of a stylish modern SUV are still proud of their invention, which is why they treat its design and exterior with love and awe, fearing to spoil the idyll with innovative modifications.

There is some visible mysticism around the “200th” Land Cruiser, because, no matter how paradoxical it may sound, it is worth improving the model and equipping it with the best indicators of handling and comfort, independent suspension and other fashionable elements - that’s all, the car will immediately lose its status. True, the Toyota management team may not think about it at all, they managed to create a strong endurance car that is ready to go through almost any off-road. As the practice of recent years shows, Prado and HiLux, due to the huge cost, cannot become a worthy competitor to the Land Cruiser. The English Defender and the American Runner will also not be able to bypass the development of Toyota in the ranking of the best SUVs.

Features of the Nissan Patrol

The Nissan Patrol Y62, which has found a place in the hearts of many Russians, is based on the same base as the latest Infiniti QX 56. The Patrol was most likely created in order to compete with the LC 200, due to which it became longer and wide, with a larger wheelbase and ground clearance.

Nissan Patrol has an excellent monumental exterior that does not negatively affect spacious saloon. Regarding the free space inside the car, it is impossible to say which is better: Nissan Patrol or Land Cruiser, since the outwardly more compact Toyota is in no way inferior in convenience, according to experts, the interior space of two cars is conducive to squat dancing.

The seats of the Nissan Patrol, located in the second row, are slightly higher than the seats of the Land Cruiser. A full-fledged third row of seats folds comfortably without reducing luggage space, in turn, the seats in the TLC 200 move to the sides, making the boot area a bit smaller.

True, for an overnight stay that can make fishermen and hunters spend the night in, it is preferable to choose a Land Cruiser, where the retracted second row of seats leaves a more even floor than in the Patrol. Despite the fact that only a few boards are transported in these presentable expensive cars, for those who want to take skis with them, it is more convenient to get them from the Land Cruiser, equipped with a hinged tailgate, the lower compartment of which can be smoothly lowered.

Regardless of which model the car owner prefers: Nissan Patrol or Land Cruiser 100, the owner will have at his disposal a car equipped with a spacious refrigerator, which will be located between the front seats. Nissan Patrol has one additional feature - its refrigerator is equipped with a bi-directional lid, which can be easily opened by passengers even in the second row of seats.

The updated version of the Land Cruiser is not inferior to its rival in newfangled “chips”, now its owner can enjoy the ventilation of the front seats, a heated steering wheel and four-zone climate control. It is noteworthy that passengers traveling in the second row can independently control the climate control unit, setting the parameters in a way that is more convenient for them. In turn, the Nissan Patrol outperforms the Cruiser in terms of adaptive cruise control and headrest-mounted monitors.

Not knowing what to choose, a motorist can buy a Nissan Patrol or a Land Cruiser with his eyes closed, any of the selected models will be able to please with newfangled modern filling elements. True, those who are accustomed to conservatism are better off choosing the TLC 200, as its design, against the backdrop of more frilly curves and massive wood trim that fills the Patrol, makes the Land Cruiser more cozy and comfortable.

Technical capabilities of devices

Gasoline powertrains, which are equipped with Nissan Patrol and Land Cruiser, open up many opportunities for the owner. For lovers of speed and huge returns, it is preferable to choose the Patrol engine, an eight-cylinder V-shaped engine with a volume of 5.6 liters with a return of 405 hp. from. allows you to accelerate from zero speed to 100 in just 6.6 seconds, which puts this car on a par with modern sports cars. As for power unit from Toyota, then everything is a little simpler here, the engine capacity is almost a liter less, and the return is one hundred “horses” weaker. This affected the acceleration speed to 100 km / h, increasing it to 8.6 s.

Subjectively considering the dynamic characteristics of both cars, we can confidently answer that Nissan Patrol, Land Cruiser, in turn, is better. As practice shows, the Patrol engine roaring all over the district requires regular power supply in the form of 25–30 liters of fuel (city driving).

Both cars are equipped exclusively with automatic transmissions with manual mode, while the Patrol has a seven-speed unit, the Land Cruiser boasts only a 6-speed gearbox. Despite the presence of all seven steps, the Patrol is characterized by a slight delay during the start, and all shifts are slightly less hidden from the user. As for the Land Cruiser, the automatic transmission slows the car down a bit during the start of movement, sharp braking is not typical for the car. And in general, despite the fact that the Land Cruiser braking system is an order of magnitude better than the one that the Nissan Patrol has, both cars lean forward with a sharp “stupor”, and the latter, in addition to everything else, goes to the side.

A huge plus of the Nissan Patrol, according to many motorists, is independent suspension, however, in practice, driving these cars is equally difficult, not even considering the fact that both cars allow the owner to simply forget about all the bumps and bumps in the road surface. The steering device of the Land Cruiser makes you not think about vibrations, its feedback is somewhat better, directional stability“more collected”, but all these superiorities are covered by lateral rolls, which are more than those of the Patrol. While driving the Nissan Patrol, its restraint immediately catches the eye, sharp turns are devoid of strong drifts. rear axle and banks. The ESP installed in the Land Cruiser 200 is also worthy of attention, although those who are not afraid of tangible rolls will like it more.

Cross-country ability of SUVs

If you put a Nissan Patrol against a Land Cruiser 200, and take both cars to Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates, where everything is covered in sand, you can pick out a clear favorite within the first ten minutes. Nissan Patrol will be able to surpass the Land Cruiser 200, since in such a situation, traction and recoil of the power unit should be put in the first place. However, most Russians will not test these cars in the sand, Russian realities are mud, snow-covered ruts and swampy terrain, but despite this, Patrol, among other off-road programs, does not have a “dirt” section.

Multifunctional device systems

Comparing the Nissan Patrol and the Land Cruiser 200 is easy enough, especially when it comes to different off-road systems. The fact is that, despite the versatility of the properties that allow the Land Cruiser to go through any off-road, its functionality that controls the system is located in separate parts of the panel, which greatly burdens the ability to quickly switch the necessary buttons, especially if off-road land owner Cruiser leaves extremely rarely. In contrast, the Nissan Patrol car has a two-stage washer that is responsible for absolutely all available Off-Road systems.

It is 275 mm, while the Land Cruiser has 200-225 mm (which is enough for him). In practice, the Cruiser is better able to overcome road breaks than Nissan, which is ready to lie on its “belly” on every pothole, however, despite the proximity of the bottom to the surface, the Patrol owner, even with a strong desire, will not be able to damage his car, since the elements are securely hidden and located on order above the frame. True, even such huge SUVs, to which everything seems simple and affordable, can get into a very unpleasant situation - both cars are able to “hang” in soft ground. If a person is driving any of the compared units for the first time, he can drive a car up to his very “ears” in a few minutes, sitting on his belly, it will be very difficult to get a car, since additional help from some powerful tractor will be needed.

Little technical tricks

Usually, people who buy a Toyota LC 200 or Nissan Patrol practice it not only off-road, but also within the city, and therefore we can conclude that these titans are comfortable, which life has brought into narrow city lanes. The fact is that Patrol has a very useful function that allows the owner of the vehicle to see on the monitor of the on-board computer a “view of the street from above”, using the built-in functionality, a picture can appear on the screen in which images from four cameras are collected. This property helps a large car not to touch the nearest cars and park carefully.

Comparing the Land Cruiser 200 with the Nissan Patrol in terms of comfort will give the latter extra points, as the Patrol is equipped with many useful features, in particular adaptive cruise control, a double-sided refrigerator cover and monitors built into the headrests. The Toyota LC 200 tries to stand up to the competition by wooing consumers with four-zone climate control, even adjustable for middle-row passengers and heated seats. In total, comparing all the facts, we can say with confidence that the Land Cruiser is a little softer and quieter.