Winter tires 225 55 r18 tests. Tire tests

Test start date: 25 January 2017
Test end date: 28 January 2017
Road quality: Excellent
Vehicle: Toyota GT86

Test drive of winter tires 225/40 R18V without studs

The German magazine Sport Auto presented the results of a comparative test of ten winter tires in size 225/40 R18V.

All tires were tested on snowy, wet and dry roads, as well as tested for rolling resistance and noise level. The magazine experts tried to find an option that offers maximum performance and minimum compromises for those who prefer sporty driving even on winter roads.

The test vehicle was a Toyota GT86 with rear wheel drive.

Grading system

In each discipline, the maximum number of points is 10. The test for environmental friendliness is significant by 10%, tests on both types of surface and snow cover - 30%.

results

In last place are Toyo tires. With a total score of 6.9. The tires performed well on dry pavement. In terms of noise level, rubber is in the last four. Toyo took 3rd place in the wet braking and handling test. The tires failed the snow tests. The exception was traction and second place.

Shared the position with a score of 6.9 tires Nankang. They also failed snow tests. But in the traction test, the tires took first place. In wet tests, the tires are in the top three. The exception is hydroplaning. There they take 3rd and 4th places.

8th place - Cooper with a score of 7.4 points. The snow cover was given to them better than the previous ones, but the result leaves much to be desired. Dry coverage was a little better. Strengths - comfort and safety on wet surfaces.

Nokian tires took 7th place with 7.6 points. The tires perform poorly on snowy and wet surfaces. In the first case, the exception was braking, in the second - lateral stability. Economy and dry coverage earned a full 9 points.

6th place - Pirelli (7.7). These tires may be recommended, but with limitations. They are good on wet surfaces. Dry and snow cover leaves much to be desired.

Tires Yokohama are located in 5th place with a final score of 7.8. The tires performed well on snow and wet surfaces. Of the shortcomings, there is noise at speeds from 40 km / h to 80 km / h. Another disadvantage is the slow response to steering movements on a dry road.

Hankook tires came in 4th position with a total score of 7.9. They can be recommended, but with limitations. They do well in the snow. They are let down by handling on wet roads and braking performance on dry and wet surfaces.

Michelin opens the top three (8.5). The experts marked it as "recommended". Of the minuses - braking distances on dry roads and hydroplaning resistance. Wet coating and snow were given as "good".

The winner's podium and a total score of 9.0 are shared between Continental and Goodyear. The first ones were quiet. Tires have a high level of fuel efficiency. The second is the balance of characteristics.

results

Tires Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850 P 225/40R18 92V
Powerful grip on wet roads

Low rolling resistance and noise level,

High performance on snow

You can find fault with hydroplaning resistance and braking accuracy on dry pavement.
Buy 1
Tires Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 225/40R18 XL 92V
Excellent grip on wet pavement

Precise and fast steering response on snow and wet road surfaces,

Good balance on dry road

Weak tendency to skid the rear wheels.
Buy 2
Tires Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 225/40R18 92V
Outstanding driving precision and handling on wet pavement,

Reliable and precise braking on snow

Some problems with hydroplaning resistance,

The braking distance on a dry road is longer than that of the test leaders.
Buy 3
Tires Hankook Winter I*cept evo2 W320 (a) 225/40R18 92V
Powerful grip and safe braking on snow,

Good handling in dry corners

Handling problems on wet roads.
Buy 4
Tires Yokohama W.drive V905 225/40R18 92W
Short braking distance on snow

Precise steering response on wet pavement,

Slow handling on dry road

Increased noise level at speeds from 80 to 40 km/h.
Buy 5
Tires Pirelli Sottozero III 225/40R18 XL 92V
Neat and precise tire in winter road conditions,

Good stability and driving dynamics on wet pavement,

Some dry handling issues

Noisy tire.
Buy 6
Tires Nokian WR A4 225/40R18 94V
Sporty and precise handling on dry roads,

Short braking distance on snow

low noise level,

Noticeable oversteer on wet roads,

Insufficient resistance to hydroplaning.
Buy 7
Tires Cooper Weather-Master SA2+ 225/40R18 92V
Safe stopping distance on wet roads

Accuracy and speed of control on wet pavement,

comfortable movement,

Poor steering accuracy on dry pavement,

Owners of crossovers, especially all-wheel drive ones, are often not enthusiastic about the seasonal change of regular summer tires to winter ones. After all, almost all native tires are marked with the M + S index, which de jure allows you to drive them in winter. The main thing is that the residual tread depth should be at least 4 mm (otherwise - 500 rubles fine). But you need to understand that the M + S marking absolutely does not oblige the manufacturer to anything! For marking, no tests or certificates are required confirming the suitability of tires for winter, and therefore, more and more often it can be seen on frankly summer, moreover, “asphalt” tires, which incidentally indicates the devaluation of not only the letter S (snow, “snow”), but also M (mud, "mud"). So we don’t look at the letters, but at the tread, and if we don’t see a lot of small slots-lamellas, then we conclude: it’s dangerous to ride on such in winter. And even better, when there is a “Snowflake” stamp on the sidewall in the form of three mountain peaks with a snowflake, these models really passed the test on a snowy track. The participants in our test are all with this marking: these are 14 sets with spikes and nine without.

The test program is standard, all the tracks of the White Hell test site near the Finnish town of Ivalo are well known to us - and most importantly, to be lucky with the weather. Almost lucky: there was no snowfall, although the temperature danced from 5 to 23 degrees of frost, so its influence had to be taken into account by conducting additional races on the "reference" tires. But the measurements of the longitudinal dynamics took place in a closed hangar with a more stable temperature.

This is where the embarrassment happened with Nokian tires, and with a model that has been produced for more than a year. Both in acceleration and in braking, studless Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2 SUV yielded not only to principal competitors, but even to the tires of their own "second line" - Nordman RS2 SUV tires! The testers of the Nokian company working in the neighborhood were alarmed, they repeated the measurements themselves ... An official investigation showed that the failed tires were produced at a plant near St. Petersburg at the end of 2016, more precisely on the 48th week. Then there was a failure in the technological cycle. They did not share details with us (apparently, there were deviations either in the duration or in the temperature of vulcanization), but they assured that the defective batch did not go on sale. Although according to outward signs everything is in order, and even the hardness of the tread rubber is the same as on the tires released in the 41st week of 2016 (their results were taken into account), but the difference in traction on ice reaches eight percent.

After measurements in the hangar, we get out into the freezing cold - and once again we notice that as the temperature drops, the friction tires begin to catch up and even overtake the spikes. At minus twenty, the ice becomes so hard that the studs cannot scratch it, and the tread rubber of most studded tires is harder - in the cold, friction tires are more elastic, they have a longer total length of slots-lamellae.

We, again, take into account changing conditions and adjust the results, but if all tests were carried out in light frost, friction tires would roll back to the bottom lines of the protocols.

Handling tests were carried out on the ice of the polar lake Tammijärvi

And in the snow, frost plays into the hands of friction models: while maintaining the elasticity of the tread, they better cling to the snow shagreen.

This time it was possible to support the cross-country ability assessments with instrumental measurements - acceleration time in deep snow with the traction control system turned off. It is curious that they topped and closed the rating Russian tires: the best - Cordiant, and the most helpless in the virgin lands - Viatti tires manufactured by the Nizhnekamsk Tire Plant.

The asphalt part of the tests is especially relevant for residents of large cities, where the streets are cleared of snow and ice for most of the winter.

The final part of the tests is already in April, on "summer" surfaces. And in passing, we note that this time there were no tires littered with spikes.

At the top of the final ranking are the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 SUV tires. Expected result: if the model of the previous generation regularly won in our tests, then the new one, and even with two types of studs, easily outperformed the competitors.

Expensive? Then we carefully look at the points, at the main advantages and disadvantages of other tires - and choose the best option for your pocket. And yet we avoid buying outsider tires - such savings threaten incomparably large costs.

Studded tire rating

Dimension	215/65 R16
(55 sizes available from 215/65 R16 to 315/40 R21)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	102 (850 kg)
Weight, kg	11,9
	9,8
	49
Number of spikes	172
	1,05/1,54
Producing country	Finland

Hakkapeliitta with index 9 is the novelty of the season: two types of spikes are used here for the first time. Those in the middle part of the tread have transversely oriented carbide inserts: they are responsible for the longitudinal grip, and at the edges of the tread rise some sort of trefoils that work effectively in corners. And this is not a marketing trick: a clear superiority over competitors both on the handling track and in braking on ice. And in other types of winter tests, the tires are on top. On asphalt, grip is moderate, and the main problem is noise at speeds from 70 to 90 km / h.

The best tires for harsh winter conditions!

Dimension	215/65 R16
(2 sizes available 205/55 R16 and 215/65 R16)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	98 (750 kg)
Weight, kg	11,2
Tread depth, mm	9,5
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	56
Number of spikes	170
Protrusion of spikes before/after testing, mm	1,52/1,47
Producing country	South Korea

This year, Hankook officially opened its polar test site in Ivalo, Finland: the routes and test approaches are in many ways similar to those used by Nokian Tires. This also applies to the features of the tires themselves: the number of star spikes was increased, which ensured decent test results on ice. But in deep snow, tires do not shine, as well as on asphalt, and besides, they make a lot of noise. But it’s easy for them to forgive: Hankook Winter i * Pike RS + tires are one and a half times cheaper than the Finnish novelty.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(91 sizes available from 175/70 R14 to 275/40 R22)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	102 (850 kg)
Weight, kg	11,4
Tread depth, mm	9,5
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	54
Number of spikes	130
Protrusion of spikes before/after testing, mm	1,03/1,25
Producing country	Russia

Tires made in Voronezh are flavored with powerful studs-brackets - and work smartly on ice during acceleration and braking. But in corners - sharp breakdowns in sliding, so without a stabilization system you have to be on the alert. But - a good balance of grip on slippery roads and on asphalt, and therefore they can be safely recommended for winter operation in large cities. If you do not make high demands on acoustic comfort.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(75 sizes available from 155/70 R13 to 275/40 R20)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	102 (850 kg)
Weight, kg	11,6
Tread depth, mm	9,2
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	54
Number of spikes	130
Protrusion of spikes before/after testing, mm	1,37/1,41
Producing country	Russia

Tires are produced at the Russian plant Continental near Kaluga. The Gislaved brand belongs to Continental- and the Nord*Frost 200 model copies the asymmetric tread pattern of the first generation ContiIceContact tires, but the studs are simpler in shape and without thermochemical fixation. However, they also work well - especially in the transverse direction.

In general, these are well-balanced tires for use both in large cities and beyond.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(37 sizes available from 155/70 R13 to 225/55 R18)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	102 (850 kg)
Weight, kg	11,9
Tread depth, mm	9,6
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	54
Number of spikes	130
Protrusion of spikes before/after testing, mm	1,63/1,62
Producing country	Russia

The tires were produced at the Yaroslavl Tire Plant and the tread pattern suspiciously resembles the Finnish Nokian Hakkapeliitta 7 tires, which even became a reason for a lawsuit. But Cordiant managed to justify itself - and increase production volumes, including by expanding the range of dimensions. Decent tires for the money, but they don’t like asphalt roads: they don’t hold very well, and rolling is accompanied by a loud and unpleasant rumble of the tread. Tires are not for the city.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(42 sizes available from 205/70 R15 to 275/50 R22)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	102 (850 kg)
Weight, kg	12,2
Tread depth, mm	9,2
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	57
Number of spikes	130
Protrusion of spikes before/after testing, mm	1,08/1,16
Producing country	Finland

Nordman tires are the "second line" of Nokian Tires, and for production, molds of obsolete Nokian tire models are used. The novelty of the Nordman 7 SUV season is the reincarnation of the Hakkapeliitta 7 SUV, produced from 2010 to 2017. Good grip on ice and snow, and on asphalt even better than the current "mother" model. Including acoustic comfort: there are fewer spikes.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(38 sizes available from 175/65 R15 to 245/45 R19)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	98 (750 kg)
Weight, kg	10,2
Tread depth, mm	10,5
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	56
Number of spikes	130
Protrusion of spikes before/after testing, mm	1,26/1,39
Producing country	Germany

The model was introduced in 2012 and has not yet received a replacement. On ice, the tires work well in the longitudinal direction, but in corners they sharply break into slips. On the snow, including virgin lands, everything is much better. But on the pavement, the aggressive pattern generates an obsessive low-frequency rumble from 30 km / h.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(58 sizes available from 175/65 R14 to 265/40 R20)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	102 (850 kg)
Weight, kg	11,3
Tread depth, mm	9,3
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	56
Number of spikes	104
Protrusion of spikes before/after testing, mm	1,05/1,09
Producing country	Russia

Michelin with the X-Ice North 3 tire continues to bend the line to comply with European studding regulations: no more than 50 studs per linear meter of tread. And the spikes themselves are simple, round in section. This led to an unimportant hold on the ice. On packed snow, the picture is better, but getting out of a snowdrift is a problem: the tread is to blame.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(23 sizes available from 175/70 R13 to 245/45 R17)
Speed index	Q (160 km/h)
Load index	102 (850 kg)
Weight, kg	11
Tread depth, mm	9,2
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	51
Number of spikes	100
Protrusion of spikes before/after testing, mm	0,87/1,06
Producing country	Russia

BFGoodrich tires are Michelin's "second line", they are produced at the same plant in Davydovo near Moscow as Michelin X-Ice North 3 tires. But the tread is its own, original. It is a pity that there are also few spikes, they are round, excessively recessed, and as a result, mediocre behavior on ice.

On snow, including on virgin soil, the situation is better. And even better - on asphalt, although you need to remember that the permissible speed is 160 km / h, although studded competitors have 190.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(35 sizes available from 175/70 R13 to 265/60 R18)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	98 (750 kg)
Weight, kg	10,9
Tread depth, mm	9,6
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	56
Number of spikes	130
Protrusion of spikes before/after testing, mm	0,85/0,94
Producing country	Russia

Formula is the "second line" of Pirelli. In last year's tests at Lada Vesta, tires took fifth place, but now the figures are more modest. Especially on ice. Even after break-in, the protrusion of the studs above the tread surface is less than a millimeter (last year we recorded 1.1 mm on new tires). On packed snow, the results are better, although we do not recommend climbing into snowdrifts. They hold up well on asphalt.

A good budget tire option for urban use.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(122 sizes available from 175/70 R13 to 285/45 R22)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	98 (750 kg)
Weight, kg	12,2
Tread depth, mm	9,5
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	55
Number of spikes	125
Protrusion of spikes before/after testing, mm	1,18/1,37
Producing country	Japan

For many, the Made in Japan brand is a sign of quality. But something went wrong with Toyo winter tires. It seems that the spikes are not simple - with cruciform inserts, and the studding is of high quality, but on ice the grip properties are moderate, as well as on snow. However, the response of the car to control is well balanced.

On asphalt - far from best comfort and grip properties.

Joy - a low price, which is consistent with the quality of tires.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(19 sizes available from 205/70 R15 to 265/60 R18)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	98 (750 kg)
Weight, kg	11,5
Tread depth, mm	9,3
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	59
Number of spikes	120
Protrusion of spikes before/after testing, mm	0,93/1,03
Producing country	Russia

Under the "Italian" name - tires produced in Nizhnekamsk using off-take technology. The design and manufacturing process is the product of an engineering firm run by a former Continental executive. However, grip on ice and snow is mediocre, and most of all upset that winter tires, “designed by European specialists specifically for Russian roads”, turned out to be helpless in deep snow. Also, they are noisy and harsh. Not an option - even considering the low price.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(96 sizes available from 175/70 R13 to 275/50 R22)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	102 (850 kg)
Weight, kg	12,1
Tread depth, mm	9
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	53
Number of spikes	128
Protrusion of spikes before/after testing, mm	0,57/0,73
Producing country	Russia

One could immediately assume that the ice tests of the Yokohama Ice Guard 55 tire would fail. Instead of the prescribed 1.2 mm, the spikes protrude an average of 0.57 mm - and do not work. And the buyer is counting on Japanese quality - even though the tires are made in Lipetsk.

There are also complaints about the tread: on rolled snow - the maximum braking distance, and on virgin soil - the worst traction abilities. For Russian conditions, other tires are needed, and they already exist: sales of the new Yokohama IG65 model with an increased number of “curly” spikes begin this season. More details about new tires - in one of the next issues of Autoreview.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(38 sizes available from 175/70 R13 to 235/60 R18)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	102 (850 kg)
Weight, kg	11,7
Tread depth, mm	9,4
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	61
Number of spikes	128
Protrusion of spikes before/after testing, mm	0,79/1,0
Producing country	South Korea

Interestingly, duplicated in the name win - is it from the word "win" or from the word "winter"? Better fit, for example, wintry ("cold", "unfriendly") or winch ("winch"). What kind of winter or victory can we talk about if studded tires are inferior on ice to most friction tires, and on the handling track Nexen is the slowest in the overall standings? Tread rubber is clearly not designed to work at low temperatures, as evidenced by its increased hardness.

Of the positive emotions, only relatively quiet (for tires with spikes) rolling remains.

Rating of non-studded tires

Dimension	215/65 R16
(61 sizes available from 205/70 R15 to 295/40 R21)
Speed index	R (170 km/h)
Load index	102 (850 kg)
Weight, kg	11,4
Tread depth, mm	8,9
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	53
Producing country	Russia

Off-road tires, with the SUV index, have sidewalls reinforced with aramid fiber, which is reminiscent of the Aramid Sidewalls brand. So with impact resistance, unlike the "passenger" tires of the same name, there should be no problems.

In severe frost, Nokian friction tires provide excellent grip on ice, behave well on snow, and small complaints appear only on asphalt.

Excellent winter tires for use in the city and beyond.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(97 sizes available from 175/70 R13 to 275/45 R20)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	102 (850 kg)
Weight, kg	11,9
Tread depth, mm	8
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	52
Producing country	Germany

Leapfrog. The year before last, we liked the ContiVikingContact 6 tires on asphalt, but they didn’t work well on ice, last year the situation reversed, this year it’s better on asphalt again ... Of course, the dimensions are different, but the reason must be sought in the composition of the rubber compound : Last year the tread rubber on the ContiVikingContact 6 tires was noticeably softer.

Now we are taking into account the latest version of these tires manufactured at the end of 2016. Not ideal on ice and snow (especially deep), but they work perfectly on asphalt.

Good winter tires for urban use. And the most comfortable!

Dimension	215/65 R16
(57 sizes available from 175/70 R13 to 255/45 R19)
Speed index	S (180 km/h)
Load index	98 (750 kg)
Weight, kg	10,7
Tread depth, mm	8,6
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	46
Producing country	Japan

Since studs are banned in Japan, local manufacturers are focusing on friction winter tires. So we will assume that it is natural that

Speed index T (190 km/h) Load index 98 (750 kg) Weight, kg 8,9 Tread depth, mm 8,4 Shore hardness of tread rubber, units 56 Producing country Germany

Lightweight tires with soft, quiet rolling. But at the same time, there is an imbalance of “winter” grip properties in the longitudinal and transverse directions, and sharp breakdowns in sliding seem to be provoked by sidewalls that are soft for a heavy crossover. Indeed, in the range of Goodyear winter tires there is a model specifically for crossovers and SUVs - UltraGrip Ice SUV, but these tires are not available in size 215/65 R16. However, if the car is equipped with a stabilization system, then Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2 tires are a good choice.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(16 sizes available from 215/65 R16 to 255/60 R18)
Speed index	R (170 km/h)
Load index	102 (850 kg)
Weight, kg	11,2
Tread depth, mm	8,9
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	56
Producing country	Russia

The tread pattern is exactly like the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R tires, but the materials are simpler. Another option to extend the life cycle of molds. And - given the price - a very good option. Moreover, in certain disciplines, Nordman RS2 SUV tires are even more preferable: the braking distance on ice is shorter!

Weight, kg 11,4 Tread depth, mm 8,7 Shore hardness of tread rubber, units 50 Producing country Russia

Quality tires for a reasonable price. On ice, they are almost as good as the leaders among tires without studs, and on snow they have even better grip in the longitudinal direction. Although the handling is harsh on the track and rowing is mediocre in deep snow.

Grip properties on asphalt are above average, there are no problems with comfort either, which means that these tires are relevant for large cities.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(38 sizes available from 155/65 R14 to 255/50 R19)
Speed index	T (190 km/h)
Load index	102 (850 kg)
Weight, kg	10,6
Tread depth, mm	9
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	51
Producing country	Slovakia

The Gislaved brand continues to lose authenticity. So the “new” Gislaved Soft*Frost 200 is nothing more than ContiVikingContact tires of the year before last, the third generation. Fortunately, these are balanced tires - safe, comfortable, not very expensive - and therefore we safely recommend them for urban use, although an accidental drive into a snowdrift may delay the planned trip.

54 Producing country China

The Marshal brand belongs to the Korean company Kumho Tire, however, according to the tread pattern and even the rare R speed index, these tires copy the Finnish Nokian Hakkapeliitta R tires - and some sellers play on this similarity. By the way, on snow and asphalt friction tires Marshal and Nokian are close, but on ice the loss of the copy is already obvious. It is also one of the noisiest and toughest friction tires available.

Dimension	215/65 R16
(37 sizes available from 175/65 R14 to 245/60 R18)
Speed index	Q (160 km/h)
Load index	98 (750 kg)
Weight, kg	12,4
Tread depth, mm	8,9
Shore hardness of tread rubber, units	49
Producing country	Japan

Winter tires Nitto (brand owned by Toyo Tires) appeared in Russia recently. The Therma Spike model managed to please us with traction on ice, but it lost the most spikes on asphalt. And the Nitto Winter SN2 friction tires immediately showed their helplessness on ice and in snowdrifts. And the more surprising is the failure of these tires even on asphalt.

Something is wrong with these Nittos...

Winter sports tire test 2017 from Auto Motor und Sport (225/45 R18). Winter tire test r18

Winter tire test 225/40 R18V

Test drive of winter tires 225/40 R18V without studs

The German magazine Sport Auto presented the results of a comparative test of ten winter tires in size 225/40 R18V.

The test vehicle was a rear wheel drive Toyota GT86.

Grading system

In each discipline, the maximum number of points is 10. The test for environmental friendliness is significant by 10%, tests on both types of surface and snow cover - 30%.

results

6th place - Pirelli (7.7). These tires may be recommended, but with limitations. They are good on wet surfaces. Dry and snow cover leaves much to be desired.

Michelin opens the top three (8.5). The experts marked it as “recommended. Of the minuses - stopping distance on a dry road and resistance to the effect of aquaplaning. Wet coating and snow were given on “good.

www.topof.ru

Elaborare: 225/40 R18 winter tire test (2016) | Colesa.ru

Perhaps someone else thinks that fitting winter tires necessarily limits the performance of the car, since they are approved for use at speeds lower than summer tires. If this was absolutely true, then only a few decades ago, since now winter tires are often not inferior to summer tires in terms of their speed characteristics, and if we talk about family cars, then the difference has already been completely leveled, and now car owners using summer tires with indexes T or H (up to 190 and 210 km/h respectively), they can easily find winter tires suitable for use at the same limit speeds. Naturally, we are talking about European-type tires and movement on asphalt. In addition, a wide range of tires with the V index (up to 240 km/h) is now available on the market, and for sports car drivers, manufacturers offer low-profile tires with the W index, which can be used at speeds up to 270 km/h.

To test what low-profile winter tires can do, the Italians from Elaborare tested five models from different brands on dry and wet pavement, where they must demonstrate all their speed qualities, as well as on snow, where tires still need to provide required level security. Not a supercar was deliberately chosen as the carrier, but a forced version of the family sedan, which is in great demand in Europe - a 5-door Peugeot 308 GT with a capacity of 205 hp. The 308 GT's top speed is 235 km/h, which is just right for the V tire tests. It was decided to test tires in size 225/40 R18 as these are the widest tires approved for the 308 GT.

List of tires tested:

Participated in the test Bridgestone tires, Continental, Goodyear, Hankook, as well as Michelin, which are the only ones with a W speed index. Pirelli was supposed to be another participant, but they refused without explanation. For comparison, some summer tires were also taken.

The test was divided into two parts. In the first, the tires were tested on a red 308 GT on dry and wet pavement, and in the second, on an identical blue car on a snowy slope. Part of the parameters, such as the efficiency of acceleration and braking, was measured using digital equipment, while the handling was additionally evaluated by the pilots, who made up a subjective opinion.

The very first tests showed that modern technological tires are all at a very high level, and differences between the leaders in the region of 1% are quite common. In each test, Continental received 100%, and the results of the rest were calculated depending on the difference with the German brand's tire score.

The tarmac tests were deliberately carried out at "not quite winter temperatures, since winter tires can often be used in such conditions, and it is important that they retain their performance well enough in this case as well.

In such conditions, all winter tires were significantly inferior to summer tires and showed approximately the same results. Continental became the best, and Michelin fell to the last place.

Longitudinal aquaplaning resistance (Grip loss rate, km/h. Temperature: 15…16°C, water layer depth - 9 mm)

In the second discipline, the differences between the tires became more pronounced, and Continental again outperformed all competitors. Hankook were recognized as the worst, which quickly leave the trajectory and require steering.

Lateral stability on a wet surface (Maximum lateral acceleration on a circular track with an inner diameter of 57.5 m, g. Temperature: 11…13°C)

In such temperature conditions, winter tires are at a disadvantage, and the current rating can be divided into three groups. Goodyear and Continental had the best times, as both tires are stable enough in corners to follow the chosen trajectory. Michelin are placed in the middle of the list as they are more prone to skidding. rear axle, resulting in understeer. At the same time, the experts noted that the rest of the Michelin behave stably, which instills confidence in the driver. Bridgestone and Hankook posted the same time, trailing the rest due to severe understeer at corner entry.

Handling on wet surfaces

This time all the winter tires finished almost at the same time, and the difference between the best and worst results was less than a second. More interestingly, winter tires are only minimally behind summer tires, and, apparently, this is where the sporty nature of winter tires with a high speed index affected. However, winter tires have a different type of tread pattern, and their less rigid shoulder blocks combined with sipes impair road holding at high speeds. They are also made from a softer rubber compound, which means that even the best Continentals are prone to understeer, and their acceleration and braking are clearly less efficient than summer tires. Hankook lost out to Continental as the Korean brand's tires are prone to skidding on the rear axle and are more difficult to follow a chosen trajectory. The Goodyear and Michelin behave much like the Continental, but have less lateral grip, with the last place being taken by the Bridgestone, which also has lateral support issues.

Dry Handling (1650m lap time, sec. Temperature: 13…14°C)

Summer tires naturally take first place, but the braking distances of the Goodyear and Continental were only 4.3 and 5.2 meters longer, respectively. This suggests that even new winter tires will be inferior to summer tires in warm weather and rain, and those who decide to “roll worn out winter tires in the summer, put themselves in danger.

Wet braking (Braking distance from 100 km/h, m. Temperature: 18…21°C)

Wet braking (Residual speed when braking from 100 km/h, km/h)

The differences between winter tires were small, with Goodyear topping the list, followed by Michelin and Continental.

Dry braking (Braking distance co 100 km/h, m. Temperature: 9…14°C)

Dry braking (Residual speed when braking from 100 km/h, km/h)

For the second part of the test, the experts went to the snowy slopes of the Alps, and, according to them, none of them imagined that testing just five tire models would require so much time-consuming work. In addition to endlessly repetitive races, it was necessary to constantly change tires on a car and install equipment on snow-covered tracks, and in total it took five days for tests, each of which specialists worked for eight hours.

Reference tires were used to control changing conditions, and to keep temperatures more stable, all tests were run at night. In the daytime, the sun begins to melt the snow, and if this is followed by a cold snap, the resulting water turns into ice, which disturbs the uniformity of the track surface.

All tires brake equally well on compacted snow, which indicates their high quality. The difference between the best and worst tires was only 70 cm, so it would be extremely difficult to make some kind of rating in this situation. But the test became a reminder of the dangers of using summer tires in winter - even when braking from 40 km / h, the residual speed of the car on summer tires will be 31 km / h.

Snow braking (Braking distance from 40 km/h, m. Temperature: -2…-5°C)

Snow braking (Residual speed when braking from 40 km/h, m. Temperature: -2…-6°C)

In this discipline, the differences between the tires have become even smaller, and the first place is separated from the last by only 27 cm. The reason for this is probably that only premium tires were taken, and it was decided to do without budget tires available on the market.

Acceleration on snow

In the final test, the pilots drove up and down a snow-covered mountain track in near-zero temperatures, and during the climb with a minimal advantage, Hankook took first place, which overtook the Continental by only 0.3 seconds. Drivers say both tires have excellent traction and traction even when starting from a standstill, and both tires turn corners without a hint of understeer or oversteer. Bridgestone, Goodyear and Michelin finished next at 1-second intervals, which also have good longitudinal and lateral grip, but still cannot go through corners as fast as the two leaders. During the descent, the differences between the tires widened and the clear leader was Continental, who overtook the Hankook by 1.6 seconds thanks to very precise line following and more effective braking. As for the rest of the tires, they were more prone to oversteer due to inertia.

Handling on snow (Time required to ascend and descend a 1,450 m track, s. Temperature: -2…-6°C)

Summing up the results of the tests, the experts noted that it is very difficult to make a rating, since in some cases the difference in the results borders on a statistical error, and tires that perform well in one discipline may turn out to be worse in another. In addition, since all tested tires belong to the premium segment, even tires that are slightly behind the rest can be considered a recommended choice.

Final table (Click on the image to enlarge)

However, there must always be a winner, and this time Continental and Goodyear came out on top with a “Very Good. Third place with a “Good” rating went to Michelin, which performed especially well on dry surfaces, while Hankook and Bridgestone, although they received only “Satisfactory”, performed very well in tests on snow. In general, all tires showed their best side, earning at least 95 points out of 100 possible.

Expert opinions on each tire are presented below.

Tire Place Expert Opinion

1	Final grade: 100.0	Good handling on snow and dry pavement + High resistance to longitudinal aquaplaning - Relatively long braking distance on pavement Verdict: Very good

2	Final score: 99.4	Short braking distances on dry and wet pavement + Good handling on wet pavement - Poorly good handling on snow Verdict: Very good

3	Final score: 97.9	Short braking distance on wet pavement and snow - Insufficient handling on snow (during climbing) - Poor longitudinal aquaplaning resistance Verdict: Good
	Michelin Pilot Alpin 4
4	Final score: 96.4	Good handling on snow and dry pavement - Insufficiently good handling and long braking distances on wet pavement Verdict: Satisfactory

5	Final score: 95.9	Short braking distance and fast acceleration on snow - Long braking distance on dry and wet pavement Verdict: Satisfactory
	Bridgestone Blizzak LM001

colesa.ru

Cheping: Winter tire test in size 235/60 R18 for SUVs (2015) | Colesa.ru

Cheping chose SUV tires for their tests as they are becoming more and more popular in China. The tires used were 235/60 R18, which is fairly common for mid-size SUVs, and the test used an Audi Q5 hybrid. The program included tests on snow, ice and slush, and also took into account the weight of the tires and rolling resistance.

List of tires tested:

The selected seven models are quite different from each other even in terms of design. Michelin and Continental belong to the premium segment, so their pattern is highly thought out and technologically advanced. Yokohama look the most severe, and Bridgestone are somewhat reminiscent of off-road tires. The large blocks are very widely spaced and this structure allows the tires to grip a lot of snow, but this design will increase rolling resistance. This was confirmed in the corresponding test, in which the Bridgestone's rolling resistance coefficient was the highest among the tires tested - 10.3. The most economical tires - Nokian - showed a result of 7.03, that is, fuel economy can be about 0.5 l / 100 km. Michelin will also have a positive impact on fuel efficiency. If we talk about weight, which also affects fuel consumption, Nokian turned out to be the lightest, and Continental and Bridgestone were the heaviest.

In the first test, handling on snow was evaluated, meaning the tires were required to demonstrate optimal traction, braking performance and lateral grip. When driving up a hill on a track with different types of corners, there were significant differences between the tires, and Nokian performed best, which have very high grip and very rarely start to slip. When cornering, the tires accurately follow the trajectory and allow you to accelerate quickly at the exit. The Michelins came in second as they are a bit more skid prone and try to move to the outside of the turn more often. Bridgestone are close to the leaders in terms of overall grip, but their behavior is somewhat nervous, and from time to time they can suddenly go into a skid.

Handling on snow (Lap time, s)

The Continental has some handling issues on snow. The tires offer excellent straight-line braking and traction, but they also have very little grip when exiting corners, which takes a long time to accelerate and the car drifts to the side. Yokohama and Triangle produce good impression could not, because they make you constantly adjust the direction of movement, and they have a long braking distance. Worst of all were Pirelli, and the experts noted that although it is written on the sidewall that these are winter tires, in their pattern and hardness of the rubber compound they are more like all-season tires. Without sawtooth ribs and a soft compound, they could not show a good result. The car slid in almost all directions, it was necessary to accelerate very carefully, and the slightest mistake could lead to a U-turn.

Handling on snow (Subjective assessment. Maximum 10 points)

Slush grip is also an important parameter, since such conditions are fraught with serious danger. On the track, covered with a 35 mm layer of snow porridge, the car accelerated to the maximum possible speed. The higher the speed, the better the tires handle slushplaning. Yokohama, with their large blocks and wide grooves, left no chance for rivals, as they can withstand speeds in excess of 36 km/h. The result of the nearest competitor - Nokian - was 2 km/h worse, and Pirelli were in the last line again, which lose grip at speeds below 32 km/h.

Slush Planing Resistance (Maximum 10 points)

The next test was carried out on an ice track, whose surface was cleared of snow before each race. Nokian, Michelin and Yokohama have proven they can handle smooth ice with confidence, and both tires have short stopping distances, high lateral grip, little understeer, excellent traction and good cornering ability.

However, Yokohama are a bit behind in terms of lap times as once they do lose traction it can be difficult for them to get it back. Triangle, Bridgestone and Continental showed almost the same results and the difference between them was only 0.4 seconds. All three tires accelerate quickly, but under heavy braking they lack stability. The last ones are again Pirelli, which did not satisfy the experts in any of the parameters.

Handling on ice (Lap time, s)

The same tires had previously been tested in summer conditions, as the experts wanted to check whether they really lose their performance so much that they create a safety hazard. Worst in winter conditions, the Pirellis ended up taking first place in the summer as their tough rubber compound helps them on the pavement. Continental and Nokian also provide acceptable grip, and Yokohama and Bridgestone were the worst, with the latter tires also showing very heavy wear on the front axle due to their soft compound.

Economy (Rolling resistance coefficient)

Expert opinions on tested tires are presented below

Tire Expert opinion

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2	Weight, kg: 13.61 Shore hardness, units: 47 Tires with outstanding grip and handling in all winter conditions. Short braking distance on all surfaces.
MichelinLatitude X-Ice XI2	Weight, kg: 13.85 Shore hardness, units: 48 The Michelins got very close to the Nokian on snow, but they are still more prone to understeer. At the same time, their time on ice is even better than that of the Finnish brand tires.
Yokohama Geolandar I/T-S G073	Weight, kg: 14.45 Shore hardness, units: 52 Yokohama was pleased with the very high resistance to slushplaning, but on snow and ice they are still inferior to the leaders. At the same time, Yokohama has very even results in all tests.
	Weight, kg: 14.33 Shore hardness, units: 54 The Chinese Triangle was not able to show good results, and when the grip is lost on the snow, the car becomes uncontrollable.
ContinentalContiVikingContact 6 SUV	Weight, kg: 15.36 Shore hardness, units: 52 Tires with certain problems with cornering on snow.
Pirelli Scorpion Ice&Snow	Weight, kg: 14.05 Shore hardness, units: 67 Tires of a well-known brand showed poor grip on both snow and ice.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V1	Weight, kg: 15.35 Shore hardness, units: 43 On snow, the tires could perform better if it weren't for the nervousness and tendency to lose grip abruptly.

colesa.ru

Winter sports tire test 2017 by Auto Motor und Sport (225/45 R18)

As you know, there are a lot of summer tire models that emphasize the strength and dynamism of sports cars. However, when the question arises to find a pair for their winter “change shoes”, everything is not as simple as it might seem at first glance.

Previously, for trips on the roads of European countries, specialized winter tires with an aggressive design were required, since snow lay everywhere, even on highways. Now the roads are cleaned with great diligence and almost all vehicles equipped with a variety of electronic assistance systems that facilitate movement. This has led to the fact that the design of winter tires has changed. Tires with massive sawtooth shoulders are a thing of the past, and in their place are models with a high tread pattern, thanks to which tires have become more versatile in use.

However, this does not exclude the fact that today the differences between tires of various brands have become even greater than ever before. And to help car owners decide which European-style tires best suit their individual needs, the expert group of the German profile magazine Auto Motor und Sport (AMS) conducted comparative tests.

An AMS test of 2017 winter tires in size 225/45 R18 showed that with the vast majority of them, something has to be sacrificed for the sake of safety on snow and wet pavement. For example, it can be the comfort of movement, fuel efficiency or traction on dry surfaces.

List of models tested by the AMS team:

Semperit Speed Grip 3
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Fulda Crystal Control HP2
Cooper Weather-Master SA2+

All test events were carried out in Ivalo (Finland) in the spring of 2017 at air temperatures from -2°C to -10°C. The test car used was a BMW 430i Grand Coupe with an engine power of 252 hp.

After numerous trials and measurements on the snow, all ten test subjects were tested in wet and dry conditions to their limits a few weeks later. The full picture with the properties of tires and all the necessary details for the selection of an individual winter ideal is presented in the form of a summary table of results at the end of this article.

The 2017 AMS winter tire test, in size 225/45 R18, awarded only one of ten models with the verdict “Highly recommended”, three received the usual expert recommendation, the performance of five of them was considered satisfactory for use in winter conditions, and one was recommended conditionally.

Test results

Snow test results (click to enlarge) Wet test results (click to enlarge) Dry surface test results (click to enlarge)

Tires with character

10. Cooper Weather-Master SA2+

The 2017 AMS winter tire test revealed a confident underdog in the Cooper Weather-Master SA2+. On snow, as well as on dry and wet surfaces, in terms of performance, it was far from its competitors. In addition, it turned out to be the most “gluttonous tire of the test, which, on top of everything else, is also quite noisy.

9. Kumho WinterCraft WP71

At the same time, Kumho with its Kumho tires WinterCraft WP71 proved that even beginners can compete in the big leagues. The South Korean development has shown good results in the most important disciplines for tires: braking on snow and dry road surfaces. And if grip reliability in wet conditions is not a priority for you, then for winter operating conditions it is quite possible to choose relatively inexpensive Kumho products.

With tires Hankook Winter i * Cept Evo2 W320 appeared approximately the same picture. They are strong on snow and dry pavement, but not as impressive in wet conditions. However, it is worth recalling here that in the mild conditions of the Central European winter, wet roads prevail, and winter tires of the European type should be extremely effective on them.

The Finnish Nokian WR A4's greatest strengths were not on the snow, as one would expect from the world's northernmost tire manufacturer, but on dry pavement and in the fuel efficiency test. Snow and wet asphalt are not her element at all. Therefore, if your plans do not include deterioration in the dynamics of your car, and you move mainly on cleared dry roads, then WR A4 tires from Nokian are your option.

The characteristics of the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 tires, which scored the same number of points with the Nokian WR A4, are more balanced in various operating conditions. The relatively high rolling resistance was attributed to minor shortcomings, which separated the model from the “Recommended” verdict. Those car owners who are not used to saving on fuel can safely buy the Sottozero 3 kit.

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2

A classic example of a winter tire in the 2017 winter tire test from Auto Motor und Sport is the Fulda Kristall Control HP2. Their excellent traction, lateral stability and fast braking on snow helped to leave many competitors behind in winter disciplines.

The hydroplaning resistance of Goodyear's sister brand products is also impressive, but in general, on wet and dry pavement, their traction is far from perfect. However, the testers gave the Kristall Control HP2 a clear recommendation for alpine regions.

A slight deficit in braking performance on wet pavement and a relatively high rolling resistance separated Michelin tires Pilot Alpin PA4 from the podium. At the same time, in all other areas they demonstrate a well-balanced performance and high safety margins.

In view of the model's life expectancy, the Auto Motor und Sport expert group recommended these tires for purchase. At the same time, the technical specialist of Shina.Guide adds, the next model of this line, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 (PA5), is about to appear on the market. It is a pity that the model range of the novelty, which was very limited at the start of production, did not allow it to participate in this test instead of its predecessor, which has been produced since 2011.

Summary table of 2017 winter tire test results from Auto Motor und Sport (click to enlarge)

3. Semperit Speed Grip 3

In the overall standings, the Austrian brand Semperit Speed-Grip 3, officially introduced in February 2017, won two tenths of the points for Michelin brand tires. They, who scored the highest possible scores in four of the five snow disciplines, can be safely called champions on the snow. At the same time, in dry conditions, one should not expect special sports dynamics from them, although these tires brake on dry pavement quite quickly. The German test group recommends using the Semperit Speed-Grip 3 model in regions with an abundance of snow on the roads in winter.

Second place in this 2017 winter tire test went to Dunlop Winter Sport 5, which guarantees the fastest braking on snow. According to the testers, it has only two minor drawbacks - a relatively high rolling resistance and low lateral stability on snow cover, which, however, did not prevent the model from finishing with the first result on a snow-covered handling track.

1. Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P

The victory in the test went to the sports winter tires Continental WinterContact TS 850 P. But they, as it turned out, have their drawbacks, says a technical specialist from Shina.Guide. Like "bears", they are weak in resistance to transverse aquaplaning. Perhaps the lack of a negative profile is to blame for this, but, as you know, a large contact area helps to increase the reliability of the grip of the tire with the roadway, and this is what helped the WinterContact TS 850 P perform decently on snow, dry and wet surfaces.

Unlike other AMS testers who performed well only in certain test disciplines, the Continental TS850P did not compromise anywhere, and therefore the high overall result of the model in the test made it an excellent option for use in Central European countries, which are characterized by mild winters with a predominance of wet and dry roads.

It is rare that modern alpine winter tires can be described as universal professionals. Many of them have disadvantages in the form of noise, restrictions on top speed and lack of dynamics on dry roads. But there are also “classic specialists, sharpened both for operation on snow and for its absence.

shina.guide

The sports winter tire market is changing. Good grip in wet conditions and short braking distances on dry roads are becoming increasingly important, but the requirements for grip on snow and ice have not gone away. Which current winter models offer the best compromise? This question is answered by the experts of the German magazine Auto Bild Sportscars, who in 2017 tested winter tires in size 225/40 R18 designed for use on sports cars.

List of tested winter models:

Sunny Winter-max A1 NW211
Nokian WR A4
Hankook W320 Winter i*Cept evo²
Fulda Crystal Control HP2
Cooper Weather-Master SA2+
Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P

This winter tire test was carried out in 2017 by Auto Bild Sportscars in the very north of Sweden. Ten sets of sports tires in size 225/40 R18 were tested with a VW Golf GTI.

Test results

The highest snow traction came from the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 and Fulda Kristall Control HP2 winter tires, which confidently carried the test car forward despite the slippery road. The worst result was achieved by Cooper WM-SA 2+ tires, which covered the “rear of the Nokian WR A4 model.

Good lateral stability also contributes to increased driving safety, especially when maneuvering at high speed. It's hard to believe, but budget tires Sunny Wintermax A1 NW211 topped the final rating of the discipline, overtaking all the premium participants in the test. The worst results were again in the winter products of the brands Nokian and Cooper.

In the 50 km/h braking performance test, the leaders of the previous test, Sunny and Michelin, strengthened their positions. The models Nokian and Cooper also decided to stay in the gallery until the end, which were already in the last positions in the third discipline on snow.

On the snow-covered handling track, the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 tires showed the best time. Their result was 0.1 km / h better than that of the closest competitor, the Michelin model.

Nevertheless, taking into account all the snow results, it was the Pilot Alpin PA4 that got the title of “Snow King of 2017. Tires Nokian and Cooper have traditionally found themselves in the last roles.

wet surface

Wet asphalt, whatever one may say, still remains the element of summer tires. But some winter tires are ready to argue with this conventional wisdom. So, in braking from a speed of 100 km / h, the Continental WinterContact TS 850 P tires were more than half a meter ahead of the specialized summer tires. And Michelin products showed the third result in the discipline, losing 2.2 m to summer tires.

The Chinese budget Sunny tires needed 13 additional meters to come to a complete stop in the wet compared to the Conti.

On the irrigated circular track, the summer tire was the best. Closest to it were the Continental TS 850 P. Good lateral stability was also recorded in the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 models. The tendency to drift on the front axle of the Sunny tires led to the last place of the cheapest participant in the test.

On the irrigated track, the handling again gave a light to the winter models, of which the WinterContact TS 850 P came to the finish line first, and the Cooper Wheather-Master SA2 + tires came second. The budget nature of the Sunny tires made itself felt in this discipline as well.

Hankook Winter i*Cept evo² and Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 ranked first in the longitudinal aquaplaning resistance test. The best safety reserves in aquaplaning are with summer tires. Lagging behind unexpectedly turned out to be Conti products. The Nokian-Sunny couple, which did not perform very well on the snow, also reminded of itself.

dry surface

In the dry braking performance test from 100 km/h, the superiority of the summer tires was all too obvious - 38.5 m. The results of all premium winter models fell into the gap of 44-45 m, and the difference between the best and worst result did not exceed 0.6 m.

The longest braking distance on dry pavement is from Chinese Sunny tires.

Due to the high siping of the profile and the soft rubber compound of the tread, winter tires are significantly inferior to summer tires and handling on a dry track. The Continental WinterContact TS 850 P and Hankook Winter i*Cept evo² outperformed the summer tires by 3.5s and 4s respectively. With a difference of seven seconds with summer tires, products finished Chinese brand Sunny.

Tire noise measurements at a speed of 80 km/h were carried out on a “standard asphalt surface. Engineers' fight for decibels protects the eardrums of drivers and the environment. The 2017 Auto Bild Sportscars winter tire test showed Cooper, Goodyear and Michelin taking the lead in reducing noise. The Fulda Kristall Control HP2 tires were the noisiest of the bunch.

A five percent difference in rolling resistance reduces fuel consumption by about one percent. Based on this formula, we can say that the worst Copper tires in the test discipline will consume 4-5% more fuel compared to the best Continental.

General test results

Three out of ten test participants showed convincing performance and no significant shortcomings in individual disciplines. And so all three received the verdict “Exemplary,” sums up the technical specialist of Shina.Guide. The German experts named the Continental WinterContact TS 850 P and Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 as the winners due to the balance of performance on dry, wet and snowy roads, while the third place was given to the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 due to slightly less reliable grip in dry conditions. .

Summary table of test results for winter sports tires in size 225/40 R18. Auto Bild Sportscars, 2017. Click to enlarge.

Verdict “Only two models, the Dunlops Winter Sport 5 and the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, did well, finishing fourth and fifth respectively.

Sadly, these 2017 Auto Bild Sportscars winter tire tests for the Sunny Winter-max A1 NW211 have ended. Even despite her successful performances in the disciplines on the snow, she ended up in last place in the final ranking with the verdict “Not recommended. The reason is simple - the experts focused on the peculiarities of mild winter conditions inherent in Germany, where sun and rain are quite common in winter. And on dry and especially on wet surfaces, budget Sunny tires did not behave in the best way.

The remaining four test participants got the verdict “Satisfactory. On the sixth line of the ranking are Hankook Winter i*Cept evo² tires. They could not rise higher because of the long braking distance on dry and wet surfaces.

The seventh place was shared by the Cooper WM-SA2+ and Fulda Kristall Control HP2 models. At the same time, the first of them are more focused on operation on wet roads, while the latter are definitely more sharpened for snow conditions.

The Nokian WR A4 tires, which the Auto Bild Sportscars test group had no complaints about only on dry surfaces, quite rightly took ninth place.

shina.guide

Auto Bild Sportscars: Winter tire test 245/40 R18 (2016) | Colesa.ru

Manufacturers are working tirelessly to improve the grip of their winter tires on snow and ice, and to test what modern 18-inch tires are capable of, Auto Bild Sportscars experts went to the very north of Sweden, in the province of Norrbotten, where the Arctic Falls test site is located. A total of eight tires were tested, which were fitted to the BMW 4-Series during the tests.

List of tires tested:

After drifting to their heart's content on the frozen lake, the experts announced that Dunlop and Michelin tires are the best for driving in the snow, and expressed their regret that Central Europeans are unlikely to be able to use their full "great potential, since in winter they most often move on dry and wet roads. At the same time, only tires with the most balanced character can become the best in the overall standings, and this time Goodyear and Continental took the first places, which, together with Pirelli, are the fastest to stop the car on wet surfaces.

Speaking about the results, the experts noted that in the snow, as expected, all premium brands performed well, and only Vredestein performed poorly. As for the Accelera, they performed just as you would expect from a low end tire.

TEST RESULTS

Michelin was the fastest to stop the car in the snow, followed by Goodyear and Dunlop. However, even the contenders in the last two places provide acceptable braking performance, which cannot be said about summer tires - they stopped only after 77 meters.

Snow braking (Braking distance from 50 km/h, m)

The best in this discipline were Michelin and Dunlop, which provide the best handling and received the highest subjective scores.

Handling on snow (Average speed, km/h)

To really enjoy snowy trails, tires must provide good cornering stability, and Goodyear, Dunlop and Michelin should be considered the best in this regard. At the same time, Vredestein has certain problems with this.

Lateral stability on snow (Average lateral acceleration in the slalom section, m/s2)

Dunlop and Goodyear from the same manufacturer are the fastest on snow, and since the Accelera's traction is reduced by as much as 20%, the wheels quickly start to spin.

Traction force on snow (Average traction force, N)

European-type winter tires are becoming more efficient on wet roads, and in this test, the braking distances of Pirelli and Continental were only 2 meters longer than summer tires. At the same time, Accelera cannot provide an acceptable level of security.

Wet braking (Braking distance from 100 km/h, m)

Wet handling is a key feature of winter tires in Central Europe, with Goodyear and Continental being the best in this regard, while the Accelera frankly fails.

Wet handling (average speed, km/h)

The Goodyear and Continental hold the grip well, while the Accelera struggles to stay on track in the wet.

Lateral stability on a wet surface (Time to complete a circular track, s)

The Continentals are the best, but it is worth noting that the differences were insignificant between all tires.

Hydroplaning resistance (Grip loss rate, km/h)

At the Tazio Nuvolari circuit near Milan, the advantages of summer tires were more than obvious, and the best among winter tires were Continental, Michelin and Pirelli, which provide acceptable stability on the rear axle during a sharp change of direction.

Handling on a dry surface (Average speed, km/h)

The differences between winter tires were relatively small, and summer tires much more effective under these conditions.

Dry braking (Braking distance from 100 km/h, m)

The most economical should be recognized as Goodyear, whose rolling resistance is 15% lower than that of Vredestein. Theoretically, this means that Goodyear can reduce fuel consumption by about 3%.

Economy (Rolling resistance, kg/t)

The times when winter tires were always noisier than summer tires are over, as the results of this test show. At the same time, the differences in the cabin are unlikely to be noticeable.

Noise(Noise level at 80 km/h, dB(A))

The ratings for the tested tires are presented in the table Note: The ratings are given according to the German school scale: 1 - excellent, 6 - unsatisfactory. If a tire scores worse than a 2- in a single discipline, or an overall score also worse than a 2- in snow, wet or dry pavement tests, it loses the opportunity to receive the final rating of “Exemplary.

Place Tire Results Tests Weight PointsSnowwet surfacedry surface Tests Weight PointsSnowwet surfacedry surface Tests Weight PointsSnowwet surfacedry surface Tests Weight PointsSnowwet surfacedry surface Tests Weight PointsSnowwet surfacedry surface Tests Weight PointsSnowwet surfacedry surface Tests Weight PointsSnowwet surfacedry surface Tests Weight PointsSnowwet surfacedry surface

1	GoodyearUltragrip Performance Gen-1

		Traction force	30%	1
		Braking	30%	1-
		Controllability	30%	2
		Lateral stability	10%	2+
		Overall score		1-

		aquaplaning	20%	2
		Controllability	35%	2
		Lateral stability	10%	2
		Braking	35%	2-
		Overall score		2

		Controllability	30%	2
		Braking	30%	2-
		Comfort	10%	2+
		15%	2+
		rolling resistance	15%	1
		Overall score		2
	Good handling in all conditions+ High lateral stability on snow and wet surfaces+ High hydroplaning resistance+ Low rolling resistance- Average braking performance on dry and wet surfaces
	Auto Bild: Exemplary
2	ContinentalWinterContact TS850P Indices: 97VPrice in Germany, euro: 650

		Traction force	30%	2
		Braking	30%	2+
		Controllability	30%	2
		Lateral stability	10%	2
		Overall score		2

		aquaplaning	20%	2
		Controllability	35%	2
		Lateral stability	10%	2
		Braking	35%	2
		Overall score		2

		Controllability	30%	2+
		Braking	30%	2-
		Comfort	10%	2+
		15%	2
		rolling resistance	15%	2+
		Overall score		2
	Sport tires with excellent handling in all conditions+ Short braking distances on snow and wet surfaces+ Precise steering responses on dry surfaces- Relatively long braking distances on dry surfaces
	Auto Bild: Exemplary
2	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Indices: 97VPrice in Germany, euro: 630

		Traction force	30%	1
		Braking	30%	1-
		Controllability	30%	2+
		Lateral stability	10%	2+
		Overall score		1-

		aquaplaning	20%	2
		Controllability	35%	2-
		Lateral stability	10%	2-
		Braking	35%	2-
		Overall score		2-

		Controllability	30%	2-
		Braking	30%	2-
		Comfort	10%	2-
		15%	2-
		rolling resistance	15%	1-
		Overall score		2-
	Excellent traction, high lateral stability and good handling on snow+ High hydroplaning resistance+ Low rolling resistance- Relatively long braking distances in wet conditions- Moderate comfort
	Auto Bild: Exemplary
2	PirelliWinter Sottozero 3 Indices: 97VPrice in Germany, euro: 640

		Traction force	30%	2-
		Braking	30%	2
		Controllability	30%	2
		Lateral stability	10%	2
		Overall score		2

		aquaplaning	20%	1
		Controllability	35%	2-
		Lateral stability	10%	2-
		Braking	35%	2
		Overall score		2

		Controllability	30%	2
		Braking	30%	2-
		Comfort	10%	2
		15%	2+
		rolling resistance	15%	2
		Overall score		2
	Balanced tires with good handling on snow+ Stable behavior and fast steering responses on snow and dry surfaces+ Very high hydroplaning resistance- Average braking performance on dry surfaces
	Auto Bild: Exemplary
5	Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 Indices: 97VPrice in Germany, euro: 680

		Traction force	30%	2+
		Braking	30%	1-
		Controllability	30%	2+
		Lateral stability	10%	2+
		Overall score		2+

		aquaplaning	20%	2-
		Controllability	35%	3+
		Lateral stability	10%	3
		Braking	35%	2-
		Overall score		3+

		Controllability	30%	2
		Braking	30%	3+
		Comfort	10%	2-
		15%	2+
		rolling resistance	15%	2
		Overall score		2-
	Good handling and short braking distance on snow + Good dry handling + High level of comfort - Poor lateral stability and poor handling on wet surfaces - Long braking distance on dry surfaces
	Auto Bild: Satisfactory
6	Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Indices: 97VPrice in Germany, euro: 530

		Traction force	30%	2-
		Braking	30%	2+
		Controllability	30%	2-
		Lateral stability	10%	2
		Overall score		2

		aquaplaning	20%	2-
		Controllability	35%	3-
		Lateral stability	10%	3+
		Braking	35%	3
		Overall score		3

		Controllability	30%	2
		Braking	30%	2-
		Comfort	10%	2-
		15%	2
		rolling resistance	15%	2
		Overall score		2
	Good handling on snow + Accurate steering responses and good performance on dry surfaces - Slower steering responses and long braking distances on wet surfaces
	Auto Bild: Satisfactory
7	VredesteinWintrac Xtreme S Indices: 97YPrice in Germany, euro: 610

		Traction force	30%	2-
		Braking	30%	2
		Controllability	30%	3-
		Lateral stability	10%	3-
		Overall score		3+

		aquaplaning	20%	2-
		Controllability	35%	3
		Lateral stability	10%	2-
		Braking	35%	3+
		Overall score		3+

		Controllability	30%	3+
		Braking	30%	2-
		Comfort	10%	3+
		15%	1-
		rolling resistance	15%	3
		Overall score		2-
	Short braking distances on snow+ Low noise level- Inadequate handling on snow- Slow steering responses in all conditions- Long braking distances on wet surfaces- Very high rolling resistance
	Auto Bild: Conditionally Recommended
8	Indices: 97VPrice in Germany, euro: 320

		Traction force	30%	3-
		Braking	30%	2
		Controllability	30%	3-
		Lateral stability	10%	2-
		Overall score		3+

		aquaplaning	20%	2
		Controllability	35%	4-
		Lateral stability	10%	5
		Braking	35%	4
		Overall score		4+

		Controllability	30%	3-
		Braking	30%	3+
		Comfort	10%	3+
		15%	2+
		rolling resistance	15%	2
		Overall score		3+
	Good hydroplaning resistance+ Low noise level+ Low rolling resistance- Cheap tires with dangerously poor grip on snow and wet surfaces- Very long braking distances on wet surfaces- Slow steering responses and inharmonious behavior on dry and wet surfaces
	Auto Bild: Not Recommended

colesa.ru

A review and comparative testing of popular tires of recent years was carried out by the working group of the PMCtire.com portal. The list of tested models includes both novelties of 2013 and the best tires of recent years.

Testing tires for SUVs has its own characteristics. When choosing, owners of powerful off-road vehicles pay special attention to behavior on clean asphalt. Of course, performance on ice and snow is also important, but in emergency you can always use all-wheel drive. With this in mind, the importance of tests on a clean road has been slightly increased. The test set itself is standard: an ice circle, braking on ice, a snake, a rearrangement on packed snow, subjective sensations in terms of noise level.

The SUV index in the tire name indicates that the model is specially designed for SUVs. Profiles available with size R18: 225/55, 225/60, 235/55, 235/60, 235/65, 245/60, 255/55, 255/60, 265/60, 275/60, 285/60.

Compared to the regular version of the Hakkapeliitta R2, the SUV model has been completely redesigned to take into account the vehicle's higher weight. Of the features of the tread, sipes should be noted, which create a pressure difference within the wheel imprint and outside. They work like pumps, providing fast drainage. For better grip on the winter road, macroparticles have been introduced into the rubber composition, making the tread surface rough. The elasticity and strength of the mixture is designed to provide rapeseed oil, cryosilane and natural rubber.

The superiority over the closest competitors is great, it becomes especially noticeable in winter conditions - on a snowy and icy road. Micro-particles are evenly distributed in thickness and provide better grip on ice. Through the serpentine and icy lap, the R2 SUV's tires gave no reason to doubt their leadership qualities. On snow, tires provide fast acceleration, confident braking, and no skidding when cornering. In addition, the model has a reduced rolling resistance coefficient (7% lower than the Hakkapeliitta 7). On dry and wet pavement, handling is clear, without delay.

The manufacturer positions the model as the best choice for working with electronic security systems. For this, an asymmetric tread and dense siping were used. For the landing size R18, the following tire profiles are available: 235/45, 255/35, 255/40, 265/35.

The central rib is formed by trapezoidal blocks. The outer side of the tread is designed for high cornering loads, using larger blocks. The inner part of the tire is designed for better grip on the snow surface - smaller blocks with an increased number of grip edges are used. The lamellae are in the form of a sinusoid.

The grip level is only slightly inferior to the test leader. When cornering on snow, side drift is minimal, on ice it picks up speed slowly, braking is confident. It has high permeability. As disadvantages, you can write down uncertain behavior on dry pavement, the car floats, noticeable delays in handling.

Crossover tires differ from passenger tires in their reinforced sidewalls and shoulder area, because they often have to jump over curbs and roadside ditches. Bearing in mind that we already tested similar 215/65 R16 tires for small crossovers a couple of years ago on a Renault Duster, this time we decided to go up a size. Audi Q5 was taken as a test car.

List of tires tested:

Opponents were selected from different price categories. The most expensive in our sample are the carriers of advanced technologies ContiIceContact 2 SUV and Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8 SUV. You can't buy these cheaper than ten thousand rubles apiece. Michelin Latitude X-Ice North 2+ is slightly more expensive than eight thousand. About seven and a half are no less eminent "cylinders" Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic SUV and Pirelli Ice Zero. And the most modest in price are the "Japanese" Dunlop Grandtrek Ice 02 (6450 rubles) and Toyo Observe G3-Ice (6050 rubles).

All tires ran 500 km before testing. And delivered straight to... hell. More precisely, in the "White Hell", as Nokian's winter training ground is called, located on the shores of Lake Tammijärvi.

What did VBOX show?

Our measuring complex VBOX cannot reach the satellites through a roof covered with a thick layer of snow covering an icy accelerating straight line (a canopy is needed in order to keep the ice in perfect condition). Therefore, we measured the accelerating dynamics and braking distance on ice using Dutron equipment with an optical sensor. For greater accuracy of the results, the acceleration time was measured to 30 s from 5 km/h, and not from zero.

The fastest spurt, as well as the shortest braking distance (from 30 to 5 km/h), Audi Q5 showed on Nokian tires (2.9 s and 14.4 m). And the outsiders were Dunlop (acceleration in 4.2 s) and Michelin (braking distance 20 m).

All subsequent tests were carried out in the open air, and measurements were taken with the VBOX complex. On the ice lap, Q5 showed the best time on Nokian tires - 31.7 s. Two tenths worse result on tires Continental - second place. And Dunlop was the most modest of all: 33.8 s.

We pass to the snow and measure the acceleration already from a standstill (from 0 to 40 km / h), but in two modes. First - without slipping, with an electronic "collar". Then - turning off the traction control TCS system and slipping all four wheels: let the four-wheel drive show what it can do.

The results have been interesting. In races with the electronics on, limiting wheel slip, the best were Continental and Pirelli - 3.3 s, four rivals needed only one tenth more, Dunlop was still a little behind - 3.5 s.

Acceleration in the style of "gas to the floor" turned out a little faster, and the places were distributed differently. The best time is on Continental, Nokian and Toyo tires. And the slowest acceleration is again on Pirelli: the same 3.3 s as on the verge of slipping. That is, on these tires it doesn’t matter how to accelerate - vnatyag or ruthlessly exploding snow. In the middle (3.2 s) were the results on Dunlop and Goodyear tires.

Expert assessments

In terms of handling on ice, Continental, Michelin and Nokian deserved the highest score. Dunlop tires caused the most complaints: delays in reactions and steering angles increase, low information content and long side slips interfere with precise driving.

Assessing the directional stability on the snow, the experts were captivated by the Pirelli spikes: the Q5 pleased them with a tight, highly informative steering wheel and immediate reactions. Dunlop, Nokian and Toyo liked a little less. For the rest, however, the claims are also insignificant.

When evaluating the handling, carried out on a special snow track, from the previous leading trio, we recognized Dunlop and Nokian tires as the best. The rest were breathing down their backs, and no one received serious remarks.

But when assessing the patency, the scatter of the results turned out to be large. We gave the Goodyear tires the highest rating, which is extremely rare: the Q5 has become a snowmobile that can’t care about any snowdrifts. Nokian and Michelin allow you to very confidently not only overcome virgin snow, but also get under way and maneuver in deep snowdrifts, as well as confidently get back in your tracks. Dunlop and Pirelli tires did without weighty remarks, but also without enthusiasm. Most insecure in deep snow, the crossover behaved on toyo tires: reluctantly started, and only retracted, and at the slightest slip he strove to dig in.

In addition, we put up preliminary ratings for ride and noise levels. The final results can be summed up only after asphalt tests, which give an adjustment for the worse.

Checking spikes

After the “white” tests, we carefully examined the tires, checked the protrusion of the studs with a special Mitutoyo indicator, and calculated their losses during the break-in and tests.

The maximum protrusion of the spikes is no more than one and a half millimeters. The existing Scandinavian restrictions (“studs” should stick out of the tire by no more than 2 mm) are respected with a good margin.

And the losses are small. Continental, Nokian and Michelin didn't sow a single thorn. Good example! Pirelli and Toyo missed one "stud" from the front left wheels. Losses of Goodyear - two spikes, Dunlop - three, all from the same front left. Since there are at least 115 studs in each tire, this is a good result.

And now - on the asphalt!

It was necessary to wait until the snow melted in the Volga region, the roads dried up and the spring wind stopped, which made it difficult to accurately assess fuel efficiency. Only at the end of April - beginning of May it became possible to test the tires on the pavement. We implemented it at the AvtoVAZ test site near Tolyatti at an air temperature of +5 ... +7 ºС. This is the temperature threshold for seasonal tire changes in any direction - from winter to summer and vice versa.

The most gentle exercise for studded tires is the evaluation of economy. We combine it with an expert assessment of directional stability on asphalt, and we also refine the estimates in terms of noise level and ride smoothness.

Alas, the transmission of the Audi Q5 does not provide for a drive mode for only one axle, therefore all work was carried out in an all-wheel drive state. For economic studies, this is far from perfect option. Permanent four-wheel drive - more precisely, the power circulating in the transmission - eliminates the difference in fuel consumption on different tires. On the other hand, the results obtained in the process of road tests are the closest to real ones in everyday use. We managed to catch an insignificant difference between the tires in terms of fuel consumption: the spread was one tenth of a liter. We believe that there are no winners and losers in this test.

But it is worth paying attention to expert assessments of the behavior of the car. In terms of exchange rate stability, Michelin beat everyone. On these tires, the Audi Q5 showed clear directional control, high information content and immediate steering responses - just like on summer tires. And in terms of comfort, Michelin was out of competition. Tires are soft and quiet. Only Continental could compare with them - but only in terms of smoothness.

Goodyear and Pirelli turned out to be on the "opposite shore" - they seemed to compete with each other in noise, vibration load and rigidity. We could not unambiguously determine which of them is louder and tougher - both models are “good”.

We finished the tests traditionally - braking on dry pavement and on wet pavement. In the discipline "wet deceleration from 60 to 5 km/h", the first place on the podium was shared by Nokian and Goodyear tires, and in dry braking from 80 to 5 km/h Continental was ahead of them all.

What will calm the heart?

Surprisingly, the composition of the podium in this season's winter tire tests (different sizes, studded and friction, passenger and SUV) is the same. Winners only change places. This speaks to the strength and stability of the leading companies - Continental, Goodyear and Nokian. This time the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8 SUV took first place in our test with 943 points. They have practically no flaws, and what has become an occasion for light nit-picking by hardened experts, ordinary drivers are unlikely to feel during everyday driving. However, the winner still has one significant drawback - the high price.

On the second step of the podium is the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic SUV 4×4 with a score of 909 points. All-Terrain Tire! This is usually forgiven for the lack of comfort. It's nice that the price is not as high as the leader.

Third place, only six points away from second place, was taken by Continental ContiIceContact 2 SUVs (903 points). These tires provide better grip on snow and dry pavement. There were no shortcomings, with the exception of very minor remarks. However, the value for money could be more attractive - if the price was slightly lower.

The Pirelli Ice Zero scored 893 points and placed fourth. These tires slow down worse than rivals on snow, losing 10% to the winner in the braking distance. But they can boast of a very clear course on a snowy road.

A modest 880 points put the Michelin Latitude X-Ice North 2+ tires in fifth position in our rankings. They have the weakest longitudinal grip on ice, but at the same time they give the car a clear and understandable handling. In addition, we were pleased with good directional stability on any road (recommended for long trips!), A high level of comfort and excellent cross-country ability - you can safely jump onto the winter road on them.

The Dunlop Grandtrek Ice02 model, which earned 876 points, also fit into the category of very good tires (according to our layout - from 870 to 899 points). It has rather weak braking properties on asphalt (it yields to the leaders about 7% on wet and a little more than 3% on dry) and lateral grip on ice. But on snowy roads and off-road Dunlop feels at home.

The Toyo Observe G3-Ice closes the list: an honorable seventh place and the title of good tires (861 points). Tires are "intelligent", our snowdrifts are not about them. Grip properties on ice and asphalt are the most modest, but on snowy roads these tires will make you feel confident. And, what is extremely important for any buyer, these tires turned out to be the best in terms of price and quality. In other words, they are not so much worse than their closest rivals, but cheaper.

There were no triplets in our sample. Until the last place - entirely excellent students and good students. Magnificent seven!

TEST RESULTS

(Maximum 140 points)

(Maximum 120 points)

(Maximum 50 points)

(Maximum 130 points)

(Maximum 20 points)

(Maximum 110 points)

(Maximum 90 points)

(Maximum 40 points)

(Maximum 30 points)

(Points)

Expert opinions on each tire are presented below.
(The "Value for money" rating is obtained by dividing the retail price by the total points. The lower the rating, the better)

A place	Tire	Expert opinion
1	Total points: 943	Place of manufacture: Russia Indices: 108T 9,6-9,8 55 Number of spikes, pcs.: 190 1,1-1,3 Tire weight, kg: 14.5 10 300 Price / quality: 10.92 + Better traction on ice, acceleration on snow without TCS, braking on wet pavement; high directional stability on snow, handling on ice and on snow - Minor remarks about directional stability on asphalt and comfort Verdict: Excellent
1	Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8 SUV

2	Total points: 909	Place of manufacture: Germany Indices: 108T Tread depth in width, mm: 10,1-10,3 Shore hardness of rubber, units: 55-56 Number of spikes, pcs.: 130 Protrusion of spikes after tests, mm: 1,2-1,5 Tire weight, kg: 14.2 Average price in online stores, rub.: 7 550 Price / quality: 8.31 + The best braking properties on wet asphalt; phenomenal patency - Low level of comfort; minor remarks on handling on snow and ice, on directional stability Verdict: Excellent
2	good year UltraGrip Ice Arcic SUV

3	Total points: 903	Place of manufacture: Russia Indices: 108T Tread depth in width, mm: 8,2-8,4 Shore hardness of rubber, units: 53-54 Number of spikes, pcs.: 222 Protrusion of spikes after tests, mm: 1,2-1,4 Tire weight, kg: 14.9 Average price in online stores, rub.: 10 050 Price / quality: 11.13 + Better grip on snow; the best braking properties on dry pavement; help save fuel clear control on ice; high running smoothness - Minor remarks regarding directional stability and handling on snow, cross-country ability and noise level Verdict: Excellent
3	Continental IceContact 2 SUV

4	Total points: 893	Place of manufacture: Russia Indices: 108T Tread depth in width, mm: 9,2-9,5 Shore hardness of rubber, units: 61-62 Number of spikes, pcs.: 130 Protrusion of spikes after tests, mm: 1,2-1,5 Tire weight, kg: 13.6 Average price in online stores, rub.: 7 550 Price/quality: 8.45 + Best acceleration on snow with TCS; very clear following the course on snow, good cross-country ability - Worst braking properties on snow; worst acceleration on snow without TCS; low level of comfort Verdict: Very good
4	Pirelli Ice Zero

5	Total points: 880	Place of manufacture: France Indices: 108T Tread depth in width, mm: 9,1-9,3 Shore hardness of rubber, units: 53-54 Number of spikes, pcs.: 116 Protrusion of spikes after tests, mm: 1,0-1,5 Tire weight, kg: 14.3 Average price in online stores, rub.: 8 350 Price / quality: 9.49 + Excellent cross; clear handling on ice and directional stability on asphalt; comfortable - Worst longitudinal traction on ice Verdict: Very good
5	Michelin Latitude X-Ice North 2+

6	Total points: 876	Place of manufacture: Thailand Indices: 108T Tread depth in width, mm: 9,8-10,0 Shore hardness of rubber, units: 60-61 Number of spikes, pcs.: 134 Protrusion of spikes after tests, mm: 1,2-1,5 Tire weight, kg: 15.2 Average price in online stores, rub.: 6 450 Price / quality: 7.36 + Help save fuel clear handling and road holding on snow; good cross - Worst lateral grip on ice; modest braking properties on snow and asphalt; Difficulties with handling on ice Verdict: Very good
6	Dunlop Grandtrek Ice02

7	Total points: 861	Place of manufacture: Japan Indices: 108T Tread depth in width, mm: 10,2-10,5 Shore hardness of rubber, units: 51-52 Number of spikes, pcs.: 115 Protrusion of spikes after tests, mm: 1,2-1,4 Tire weight, kg: 15.2 Average price in online stores, rub.: 6 050 Price / quality: 7.03 + Best acceleration time on snow without TCS; clear directional stability on a snowy road - Modest traction on ice and braking properties on asphalt; limited permeability Verdict: Good
7	Toyo Observe G3-ICE

In Europe, the question of what winter tires should be for sports cars divides drivers into two camps - some prefer tires to provide maximum grip on snow, while others believe that driving performance on asphalt is more important, since in winter they use their sports cars only on dry and wet roads, and in case of snowfalls refrain from traveling.

Experts believe that in any case, grip on snow and wet surfaces is of key importance, since in such conditions a lot depends on tires. At the same time, when used on dry surfaces, tires must be able to withstand high loads and speeds, since they are still designed for sports cars. Thus, a sufficiently high level of versatility is still required from tires, and, as the test showed, not everyone copes with this task.

The most balanced were the two tires developed by Continental and Goodyear, while the third place was taken by the Michelin tires, which still had some weaknesses. When experts evaluated the cost of these tires in German stores, it turned out that they could well be considered the most expensive in their segment. The average price is 170 euros, so the installation of four tires will require about 800 euros.

While top tires are for demanding drivers who are not on a tight budget, there are those who would like to save money when buying winter tires. Especially for them, Nankang tires were added to the test at a price of 87 euros. The savings can be up to 330 euros, but the problem is that the tires of the Taiwanese brand have very poor snow performance. They have long stopping distances, poor traction and poor handling on snowy surfaces, and besides the hydroplaning resistance test, they performed very poorly on the wet track. At the same time Nankang with their hard rubber compound provide very good steering response and better braking performance on dry pavement, and in general they can be recommended to those who drive only in good weather. A similar situation was with the much more expensive Toyo at 130 euros, which can only be recommended with restrictions.

The €120 Cooper tires performed mediocre on snow, but nearly matched the Michelin on dry pavement. They also perform very well on wet surfaces, especially in terms of hydroplaning resistance. Thus, they can be recommended for regions where in winter it is often necessary to move on wet roads.

Yokohama, Nokian and Hankook are offered in the range of 140-150 euros. The Japanese brand tires have good performance on snow, acceptable on dry and wet pavement and high rolling resistance, while Nokian has diametrically opposed priorities. Tires of the Finnish brand save fuel, work well on dry surfaces, but at the same time they have poor results on snow and wet surfaces.

Hankook failed to get a Recommended rating despite good performance on snow and dry pavement, with long wet braking distances being the main reason. Whatever the case, Hankook was able to beat, for example, the more expensive Pirelli, which perform poorly on snow and dry surfaces.

Verdict: If you're willing to put up with a few shortcomings, then Cooper, Yokohama and Hankook are interesting alternatives to more expensive tires from top brands.

Test results

The ratings for the tested tires are presented in the table
In all disciplines, the winner receives 10 points, and the rest of the results are calculated depending on the difference with the best score. The weighting of the overall score in snow, wet and dry tests is 30% each, and in environmental tests it is 10%.

Also on topic

Jagged Crown Acquire the Jagged Crown of skyrim.

mods skyrim revival of the dark brotherhood 2

Cutting Room Floor - Mods and plugins for TES V: Skyrim Special Edition

Where can I find spell tomes in Skyrim?

Daedric Princes: Mehrunes Dagon