In preparation for the assembly of the motor, there was a strong desire to assemble reliable engine. Because having suffered enough with the previous carburetor, I didn’t really want the engine to fail at the most crucial moment. In view of the fact that it is quite difficult to purchase high-quality domestic spare parts today, the idea arose to find analogues from imported manufacturers. And I started looking for replacement parts from imported manufacturers. The catalogs of VAZ factory parts, which can be easily found on the Internet, users of various Internet forums, as well as exist websites, helped a lot in this. Ru and motorzone.
En Of course, it was not possible to replace the entire range of parts, but still this is a big step forward. So I am starting to publish a study on the replacement of domestic spare parts with imported ones. I decided to make groups of the main components and assemblies. ENGINE, POWER SYSTEM 1. Timing belt.
a.e. Catalog number: TB479. Suitable for engines 2112 with a volume of 1500 cm3. It is very pleasant to hold this belt in your hands, compared it with the domestic BRT and its analogues, the difference in quality is obvious.
2. Drive belt for attachments. a.e. Catalog number: MVB698R6.
Alternator belt for injector Samar, Samar 2. It will not work for the tenth family, because dozens have a different alternator mounting bracket, so a longer belt is needed. There is only one belt manufacturer: Ae, a subsidiary of Federal Mogul.
3. Water pump (pump) of the engine cooling system: SCT. Catalog number: SQ 006 (with aluminum impeller) Hepu. Catalog number: P 625 4. Tensioner and bypass rollers: After 5 thousand rustled. Removed, opened.
Diagnosis: there was practically no lubrication and it smelled of something burnt. I assume that after changing the lubricant they will still serve. Metal, manufactured by AT: I recommend with the correct lubricant for bearings Ciatim 221. E is produced in our Urals. Even pride appeared for the native supporting edge))) Tsiatim-221 grease is an anti-friction heat-resistant grease.
Substitutes: VNIINP-207 (up to minus 40`С), TsIATIM-221s. Tsiatim-221 grease is efficient in the temperature range from -60 to +150C. Scope: rolling bearings of electrical machines, control systems and instruments with a rotation speed of up to 10000 (min-1), aggregate bearings of aircraft, friction units and metal-rubber mating surfaces operating in vacuum. Main performance characteristics: insoluble in water, hygroscopic, stable even when boiled.
When moisture is absorbed, it becomes compacted, has low anti-wear characteristics, is chemically resistant, inert to rubber and polymeric materials. Operable at a residual pressure of 666.5 Pa in the temperature range from minus 60 to plus 150`C. Composition: organosilicon liquid thickened with complex soap; contains an antioxidant additive. Dropping point, `С, not less than 200 Penetration at 25`С, mmg10-1 280-360 Effective viscosity at minus 50`С and an average strain rate gradient of 10 s-1, Pagс, not more than 800 Colloidal stability (mass fraction of extracted oil ), %, not more than 7.0 Tensile strength at 50`С, Pa, not less than 120 Mass fraction of free alkali, %, not more than 0.08 crankshaft thrust washers: Ae.
Catalog number: AEM5481 STD SM. Indigenous liners 2108-09 std 43-2804-00 SM. Indigenous liners 2108 (0.25) 432804-25 Ae. Part number: AEW21 STD Fiat/Alfa/Lancia. Catalog number: 902160 Glyco.
Part number: A198/2 STD Manufactured by Glyco, a subsidiary of Federal Mogul, fitted to standard front wheel drive vases. There are repair sizes, to find them, you need to replace the letters STD with the desired size, for example 025mm. 6. Valve stem seals: Goetze (the same daughter of Federal Mogul). Catalog number: 50-306538-50 Herzog.
Catalog number: HL2 7026 7. Hydraulic lifters: Herzog. Catalog number: HL0 7300 Nakamoto. Part number: 21121007300 INA.
Catalog number: 420 0073 10 8. Valves and valve springs Cylinder head 2112: Mvi. Part number: 85-2816 Ipsa.
Part number: VL173400 Mvi. Part number: 85-2817 Ipsa. Part number: VL173500 9.
Filter elements: Toyota. Part number: 90915-YZZJ3 Mann. Part number: C22117 VAG. Catalog number: 021 129 620 Mann.
Catalog number: WK512 VAG. Catalog number: 6X0 201 511 B 10. Spark plugs: Toyota (Denso). Iridium. Part number: 90919-01210 11.
Engine cooling system: Nissens. Catalog number: 623552. Radiator 2112 VAG. Catalog number: 443 121 321. Expansion tank cap 2108 VAG.
Catalog number: 1J0 121 403 B. Expansion tank VW Golf 12. Gaskets, oil seals, sealing rings, bolts: Ajusa. Catalog number: 54120600. Rear power unit gasket set.
1. Rear crankshaft oil seal 2. Front crankshaft oil seal 3.
Oil pump gasket 4. Crankshaft rear cover gasket 5. Sump gasket 6. Spark plug well seals (upper bottom) 7.
Thermostat gasket 8. Timing housing seal (it is believed that for 8 cells. Engine) 9. Gearbox gasket.
Hyundai/Kia. Part number: 35312-22000. Gasket for fuel injection nozzle. Completely interchangeable with VAZ.
Koivunen Oy. Part number: 037-131774A. Ajusa exhaust manifold gasket. Part number: 13177400. Exhaust manifold gasket.
Ajusa. Part number: 10144200. Ajusa cylinder head gasket. Catalog number: 14024900. Oil pan gasket.
Ajusa. Catalog number: 15006200. Camshaft oil seal. Goetze.
Part number: 22-17007B. Cylinder head bolt. Replacement for cut 08th bolts (M12*1.
25*133) from Fiat 1. 4 TD, (have to cut) Goetze. Part number: 22-17014B. Cylinder head bolt. PAYEN.
Catalog number: HBS131. Cylinder head bolt (kt). Replacement of 12th bolts (M10*1.
25*100) for FIAT vehicles SIENA Tightening order: 3kg, 5kg, 10kg, lapel 90*, 10kg, 90*, 90* FORCE key M14 Clutch 2112 16 cl. LUK 620305100 STEERING, TRANSMISSION, SUSPENSION AND BRAKING SYSTEM DETAILS: * Here I made an unambiguous conclusion for myself, only TRW (the products of this company are supplied to the conveyor of VAG and others). Brake drum 2108-2110, Kalina (DB 4307) Ball joint 2108 lev.
Right. (JBJ156) Tie Rod 2108 lev. =right (JTE108) Wheel bearings 2108 (set: bearing + nut): On the last photo of the block from Alpha, you need to grind off the part that is marked with red arrows to the friction lining. Gearbox bearings Input shaft: Toyota front bearing.
Analogues: 6205ZZ, 93306-205U6-00 (Yamaha), NJ 205 Toyota rear bearing. Analogues: 6305DDU, 6305C3, 90601-0012 (Subaru), 97100-06305, 5-81229-104-0 Secondary shaft: KOYO front bearing. Toyota rear bearing. Analogues: 6305DDU, 6305C3, 90601-0012 (Subaru), 97100-06305, 5-81229-104-0 BODY, ELECTRIC: Alternator Alternator bearing 2112 small Toyota Dimensions: 15x35x11. Analogues: 62022RS, 6202ZZC3E, 6202-2NSE, 6202ZZ.
Generator bearing 2112 large Toyota Analogs: 62032RS, 6203ZZ Generator bearing 2112 large. KOYO Generator voltage regulator 14,5v Huco Alternator Lucas Electrical 80A Analogues: 8EL 737 546-001, 32201440, 9090009 Windshield washer system Washer motor windshield G.M. Windshield washer motor VAG. Opel windshield washer check valve. Toyota windshield washer check valve. Check valve (tee) of the Toyota windshield washer (installed instead of the native tee).
Check valve (tee) windshield washer Volvo. Volvo windshield washer check valve. *! There is a triangle on the valves, the top of the triangle should look towards the nozzles. P. S. ^ As it is processed, the information will be updated :) P.
S. 2^. Perhaps someone will be interested in why most of the parts are produced by VAG? The answer is simple AvtoVAZ has been friends with VAG for a long time, so the details are similar. Article from: http://www.drive2.ru.
In the current scenario, you can expect good visibility, but it is hampered by wide A-pillars.
A clear advantage Logan's ergonomics are much better: the vertical adjustment is not formal: the range is sufficient, and the seat itself is more comfortable.
In terms of ergonomics, Logan can only be scolded for minor flaws: the air conditioning button LED is on when it is turned off, and the rear power window keys are located on the center console.
If a driver of average height moves back “behind him”, then in both cars he will find a sufficient gap in front of his knees - 8–10 cm.
In height, as in the front row, Logan provides more space, and in width at shoulder level, Cobalt is 10 mm more spacious.
Discussing the driving properties of both "state employees", it makes no sense to sort out the nuances of handling. If such a sedan provides acceptable control accuracy, predictable reactions and good stability, this is quite enough.
But on the smoothness of the ride and the energy intensity of the suspension, you should dwell in more detail. In terms of resistance to breakdowns when driving over bumps, the suspensions of both rivals are highly commendable.
This is a really important factor for our roads, because not everywhere is smooth asphalt. If we compare which is more comfortable, then Logan wins a little.
On small irregularities, especially with sharp edges, Cobalt more often disturbs riders with shaking, and also transmits not only longitudinal, but also transverse changes in the road profile to the body in more detail.
At the same time, it should be noted that the processing of alternating irregularities by the suspension does not lead to buildup, and with vigorous maneuvering there is no feeling of rolling. Both participants of the test were checked ...
Chevrolet Cobalt
For this car, the designers managed to provide good capacity and even, moreover, make the rear of the cabin a little wider than that of the opponent.
However, the struggle for longitudinal capacity was not without cost, and the driver's seat proved to be highly positioned even at the lowest level of the adjustment range.
Some of the drivers, especially of short stature, may like this position: I sit high, I look far away.
But when a tall person gets behind the wheel, the ceiling is too low. In general, the interior of the Cobalt is perceived as less comfortable both in terms of ergonomics and overall perception, in particular, due to the finishing materials.
Despite the fact that the rivals are the same in overall width, the space in the cabin at the level of the shoulders of the rear passengers is slightly larger in the Cobalt.
The mirror adjustment panel is successfully arranged on the door, on the same level as the mirror. The numbers are large and easy to read. Dissonance is only in the combination of digital and analog feed. Simple and convenient: handwheels allow you to control the microclimate without taking your eyes off the road.
Both cars show excellent energy intensity of the suspension. But if we compare them in terms of comfort, Logan wins a little.
Nuances of dynamics
Cobalt can be considered dynamic, but with a caveat: to do this, you must not be lazy to spin up the engine more and switch to low gears in time. Logan is undemanding to 
the timeliness of the choice of the desired stage. There is no doubt, in terms of ease of operation, Logan is forgiving and as “friendly” as possible.
Renault Logan
The Logan, like its rival in the test, does not have a steering column reach adjustment, but the overall comfort of the fit is noticeably better. Regardless of the type of physique, you can easily find the optimal position, spending no more than a minute on it. Access to most of the controls is well organized.
The comments concern only minor nuances of using individual buttons. In interior decoration, the manufacturer managed to avoid feeling like an obvious economical option. The fabric that is upholstered in the seats makes a good impression.
In general, Logan is perceived as a more comfortable, ergonomic and aesthetic car. The front panel is finished with hard plastics, but due to the selection of texture and color 
gamma does not have the feeling that they saved on the interior.
In the version that combines the additional functions of the steering wheel with a leather sheath, the grip in the area of the spokes is not very comfortable. The instrument cluster looks grown-up, but it lacks an engine temperature gauge.
It’s beautiful, but it’s unlikely that you can adjust the distribution of air flows without looking. In the rear of the Logan's cabin there is a bit more headroom.
What will happen in 2019: expensive cars and disputes with the government
Due to the growth of VAT and the unclear future of state support programs for the car market, new cars in 2019 will continue to rise in price. We found out how auto companies will negotiate with the government and what new products they will bring.
However, this state of affairs only stimulated buyers to make decisions more quickly, and the VAT increase planned for 2019 from 18 to 20% was an additional argument. Leading auto companies told Autonews.ru what tests await the industry in 2019.
Numbers: sales are up for 19 consecutive months
According to the results of sales of new cars in November 2018, the Russian car market showed an increase of 10% - thus, the market continues to grow for 19 months in a row. According to the Association of European Businesses (AEB), in November, 167,494 new cars were sold in Russia, and in total from January to November, automakers sold 1,625,351 cars - 13.7% more than last year.
According to the AEB, December sales results should be comparable to November. And according to the results of the whole year, it is expected that the market will reach the figure of 1.8 million cars and light vehicles sold. commercial vehicles, which would mean a 13 percent plus.
In 2018, sales of Lada (324,797 units, +16%), Kia (209,503, +24%), Hyundai (163,194, +14%), VW (94,877, +14%), grew most noticeably in 2018 according to data from January to November. 20%), Toyota (96,226, +15%), Skoda (73,275, +30%). He began to reach lost positions in Russian Mitsubishi(39,859 units, +93%). Despite the growth, Subaru (7026 units, +33%) and Suzuki (5303, +26%) lagged behind the brand.
Sales improved in BMW (32,512 units, +19%), Mazda (28,043, +23%), Volvo (6854, +16%). The premium sub-brand from Hyundai - Genesis "shot" (1626 units, 76%). Stable in terms of Renault (128,965, +6%), Nissan (67,501, +8%) Ford (47,488, +6%), Mercedes-Benz (34,426, +2%), Lexus (21,831, +4%) and Land Rover (8 801, +9%).
Despite the positive figures, the total Russian market remain low. According to the Avtostat agency, historically the market showed the maximum value in 2012 - then 2.8 million cars were sold, in 2013 sales decreased to 2.6 million. In 2014, the crisis came only towards the end of the year, so there was no dramatic drop in the market - the Russians managed to buy 2.3 million cars at "old" prices. But in 2015, sales collapsed to 1.5 million units. The negative dynamics continued in 2016, when sales sank to a record low of 1.3 million vehicles. The revival of demand occurred only in 2017, when the Russians bought 1.51 million new cars. Thus, the initial figures of the Russian automotive industry are still far away, as well as the status of the first market in terms of sales in Europe, which Russia was prophesied in the pre-crisis years.
Representatives of auto companies interviewed by Autonews.ru believe that sales in 2019 will be comparable to the results of 2018: according to their estimates, Russians will buy the same number of cars or a little less. Most expect a failed January and February, after which sales will go up again. However, auto brands refuse official forecasts before the start of the new year.
“In 2019, the cars bought in the pre-crisis 2014 will be five years old already - for Russians this is a kind of psychological mark at which they are ready to think about replacing the car,” said Valery Tarakanov, marketing director of Kia, in an interview with Autonews.ru.
Prices: cars went up in price all year
New cars in Russia after the crisis of 2014 by November 2018 rose by an average of 66%, according to Avtostat. For 11 months of 2018, cars have become more expensive by 12% on average. The agency's experts came to the conclusion that auto companies have now almost won back the fall of the ruble against world currencies. But they stipulate that this does not mean a price freeze at all.
Inflation and an increase in the VAT rate from the beginning of 2019 - from 18% to 20% will contribute to a further rise in car prices. Representatives of auto companies in conversations with an Autonews.ru correspondent also do not hide the fact that the increase in VAT will directly affect the cost of cars, and from the very beginning of 2019, for example, this was confirmed by Renault, AvtoVAZ and Kia.
Discounts, bonuses and new prices: when is the best time to buy a car
“On the threshold of the last quarter of the year, the Russian automotive market continued to show strong growth. However, this pleasant fact did not come as a surprise, given the tailwind in the sails of the entire retail sector, counting down the time until the VAT change. There is growing concern among market participants regarding the sustainability of demand in retail starting from January 2019,” explained Joerg Schreiber, Chairman of the AEB Automobile Manufacturers Committee.
At the same time, automakers hope that the ruble exchange rate will not change much against foreign currencies, which will help avoid price spikes.
State support programs: gave half as much
In 2018, two times less money was allocated to state support programs for the car market, popular with Russians, compared to 2017 - 34.4 billion rubles. instead of the previous 62.3 billion rubles. At the same time, only 7.5 billion rubles were spent on targeted programs designed specifically for motorists. We are talking about such programs as "First Car" and "Family Car", which apply to cars worth up to 1.5 million rubles.
The rest of the money was spent on more specific programs like Own Business and Russian Tractor. For development and production activities Vehicle with remote and autonomous control spent 1.295 billion, to stimulate the acquisition of ground electric transport- 1.5 billion, for measures to stimulate production in the Far East (we are talking about compensating transportation costs for car companies) - 0.5 billion rubles, for the purchase of gas-engine equipment - 2.5 billion rubles.
Thus, the government, as promised, continues to systematically reduce the volume of state support for the industry. For comparison: in 2014, only 10 billion rubles. went to recycling programs and trade-in. In 2015, 43 billion rubles were allocated to support the automotive industry, of which 30% was also spent on recycling and trade-in. In 2016, spending on state support for the automotive industry reached 50 billion rubles, of which half was also spent on similar targeted programs.
As for 2019, the situation with state support remains. So, in the middle of the year, the Ministry of Industry and Trade announced that the First Car and Family Car programs were extended until 2020 inclusive. They should allow buying new cars at a 10-25% discount. However, automakers claim that they still have not received any confirmation of the extension of the programs - the Ministry of Industry and Trade has not been able to clarify the situation and respond to Autonews.ru's request for a month.
Meanwhile, at a recent meeting with automakers, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Kozak said that the volume of state support for the domestic automotive industry is five times higher than the budget revenues from this industry.
“Now it is 9 rubles per 1 ruble of revenues to the budget system from the automotive industry. This is with a recycling fee, and without a recycling fee - 5 rubles of state support,” he said.
Kozak explained that these figures should make one wonder under what conditions state support measures should be provided to the auto industry, adding that the vast majority of business sectors do not receive any support from the state at all.
Disputes with the government: auto companies are unhappy
In 2018, disputes between auto companies and the government over the conditions for further work on the market intensified. The reason was the expiring terms of the agreement on industrial assembly, which gives car companies that have invested in the localization of production a tangible set of benefits, including tax benefits. This situation primarily means that manufacturers, in the face of uncertainty, may postpone the launch of new models, which, by the way, threatened Renault. In addition, it is more difficult for companies to predict their pricing policy. At the moment, the government, represented by the Ministry of Industry and Trade and the Ministry of Economics, has still not been able to develop a unified strategy.
Until recently, the departments offered various tools to replace the ending decree on industrial assembly No. 166. Thus, the Ministry of Industry and Trade actively lobbied for the signing of individual special investment contracts (SPICs) between the government and car companies. The document provides for a certain set of benefits, which is determined separately with each signatory, depending on the amount of investment, including in R&D and export development. This tool has been repeatedly criticized by car executives for being non-transparent and too rigid in terms of further investment.
The Ministry of Economics, in turn, opposed it for a long time and insisted that only those who produce high-tech products, which cars do not belong to, can work under SPICs. The FAS also joined the negotiations with the position that companies should not form alliances and consortiums, that is, they should not unite to sign SPICs. At the same time, it was precisely this idea of combining brands to obtain a synergistic effect that began to be promoted in the Ministry of Industry and Trade many years ago.
Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Kozak had to intervene in the conflict situation, he created a special working group, invited representatives of all auto companies to it and also expressed a number of his own ideas. But even this did not defuse the situation - auto brands complained about newcomers, including Chinese companies that could count on state support from scratch, about their unwillingness to invest too much in R&D and export organization.
At present, according to Autonews.ru sources participating in the negotiations, the majority is on the side of the Ministry of Industry and Trade, and a number of auto companies are already preparing to sign SPICs in the new year. And this means new investments, projects and models, the appearance of which can revive the Russian car market.
New models: there will be many premieres in 2019
Despite accurate forecasts from automakers, most of them are preparing a lot of new products for Russia. For example, Volvo Autonews.ru said that they would bring new Volvo S60 and Volvo V60 Cross Country. Suzuki will launch an updated Vitara SUV and a new Jimny compact SUV.
Skoda will bring the updated Superb and the Karoq crossover to Russia next year, Volkswagen in 2019 will begin Russian sales of the Arteon liftback, as well as new modifications of the Polo and Tiguan. AvtoVAZ will roll out Lada Vesta Sport, Granta Cross and promises a few more new products.
The first generation was considered a rookie debutant in the segment inexpensive sedans, then the second generation turned him into an experienced master. Now - this is the starting point for all the "recruits" who have not yet had time to sniff the gunpowder. And the manufacturers of the Chevrolet Cobalt, who released this model as a direct competitor to Logan, should have understood this. Let's take both cars apart and find out if Cobalt Logan is worthy?
Renault Logan of the first generation immediately went to the masses
The fact that over time everything changes - both the budgets of buyers, and the concept of "real" good car- not news. I recall that a few years ago they said that the idea of the French automakers regarding Renault Dacia / Logan would cost good money. It seemed like they were counting on the amount of 5 thousand US dollars and did not aim for more. And indeed, at first the project was implemented and the first Logan went to the masses, only now the price confidently stepped over not 5, but 10 thousandth mark. Today the dollar is not what it used to be, but Logan is still holding on and he doesn't have too many competitors.
Interestingly, manufacturers Renault Logan set out to compete not easily with A-class cars, but to compete in a higher class. And the designers are trying, which is remarkable, by any means to create a good spaciousness of the cabin and make the size of the trunk incredibly voluminous. This rearmost compartment is larger than many golf cars and even rivals the trunks of some D-class sedans.
Known a few years ago, she also became interested in the release of similar budget models that would always keep the price. Citroen C-Elysee and the 301st, and last year Chevrolet, decided to play by the same rules and released a direct competitor into the arena - Chevrolet Cobalt. This car is the development of one of the branches of General Motors, which was originally aimed at the countries of the so-called third world. It was decided to start production of the Chevrolet Cobalt, respectively, in one of the Central Asian republics.
What are the differences
Let's start with the design, it would seem the most thankless task, but what can you do. It was the exterior surfaces of the Chevrolet Cobalt body that made us do it. They seem to be ironed, if not by amateurs, then by novice designers, but you can’t say this for sure by Logan’s appearance. It is immediately clear from it that this is a second-generation car, no money or effort was spared to improve its exterior.
The interior of both cars evokes almost the same sensations. Logan, for which sophisticated solutions and expensive materials were limited (why be surprised, because this is a state employee ?!), should not have been, but it is perceived much more pleasantly and more logically than Cobalt. Here it is impossible not to note the features of the layout of the cabin Chevrolet Cobalt, where, in order to ensure maximum spaciousness, they emphasized the verticality of the landing and placed the front seats clearly high. It turns out that with an average build, even at the lowest position of the seat, it will still sit high, like on a chair. If the height of the driver is above average, then it is dangerous to get into this car, as you will definitely hit the ceiling with your head. It seems that in this situation you expect excellent visibility, but alas, in order for this to come true, you need to at least double the front pillars.
Advantage Logan
It is obvious. Better at Logan with vertical seat adjustment, which is not formal, like its competitor. In addition, the range of settings themselves is wide, and the driver's one, even despite the shorter pillow. As for ergonomics, Logan could only be scolded for minor flaws, such as the LED button for the air conditioner, the rear power window keys, and so on.
In both cars, there is sufficient clearance in front of the knees of the rear passengers. As much as 10 cm of clearance is enough to comfortably travel the longest distances.
In general, both in height and length, Logan represents more space. But the width is more spacious in Cobalt, which is clearly seen at shoulder level.
riding
No one was going to judge strictly by driving characteristics. The fact is that it is enough for such sedans to show acceptable control accuracy, predictability of reactions and excellent stability. The rest is not so important.
But to test thoroughly the energy intensity of the suspension is another matter. And both sedans did not let us down, showing good resistance to breakdowns on rough roads. On our Russian roads this parameter is very important.
Still more comfortable ride on Logan. Cobalt shakes more often on small bumps, and its body plays in unison with longitudinal and transverse drops pavement. All this negatively affects not only the passengers, but also the driver, who is constantly tense. roads are not paved everywhere and Cobalt in this regard is already losing to Logan, who copes much better with bad roads.
But you can’t find fault with the suspension of both sedans. They do not lead to buildup even with alternating irregularities. In addition, with vigorous maneuvering, there is no feeling of rolling, as on some cars. Both cars showed themselves well in terms of motion sickness. Tested on children prone to motion sickness, and everything went without trouble.
Dynamics and its nuances
Some in the test called Cobalt more dynamic. But this is the case if you are not lazy and spin the motor more, switching to low gears in a timely manner.
In the dynamics of overclocking, Logan is unambiguous. He accelerates with great desire, and even from the bottom (without showing much skill, you can safely move off at 2nd speed). Logan does not impose special requirements on the choice of the desired stage and is much more convenient than Cobalt. One could say this: Logan is just the perfect car, but it’s a pity that he doesn’t have an automatic transmission, like the expensive version of Cobalt.
Prices
And finally, the most important thing for our buyer, who only recently began to understand that it is not only the cost of a car. So, prices for Cobalt versions start at 483 thousand rubles. I am glad that the basic version of the car includes heated front seats and mirrors in the options package, this is very important for our Russian winter. As for the speaker system, only the so-called “preparation” is provided, for which the owner must already select the head speakers separately. But ABS, alloy wheels, fog lights, a computer, an alarm system - all this comes only with expensive versions, already for 572 thousand rubles, which includes the long-awaited automatic transmission.
As for the Logan, this sedan has a good choice in terms of engines. With a single 5 manual transmission, you can choose an option with 82 hp. with. or from 102 l. with. The most affordable version with 82 hp. with. the engine is sold for 355 thousand rubles. It implies the presence of meager options. The cost of Renault Logan with a 102 hp engine. with. starts from 428 thousand rubles, but here the set of options is much wider. There are ABS, power steering and much more. Although, interestingly, air conditioning comes at an additional cost of 25 thousand rubles. The most expensive Renault Logan equipment includes necessary set security and comfort systems, and plus everything there is an opportunity for an additional payment of 14 thousand rubles to become the owner of Multimedia.
Advantages and disadvantages
Chevrolet Cobalt
- Good capacity.
- The wide rear of the cabin compared to Renault Logan.
- The mirror adjustment panel is conveniently placed on the door, harmonizing on the same level with the mirror.
- Width of space on back seat more than the opponent.
- Convenient control of microclimate buttons.
- Easy to read and large numbers on the instrument scales.
- Driver's seat too high.
- Less comfortable interior overall.
- Worst quality finishing materials.
- Dissonance in the combination of digital and analog feeds and dials.
Test drive of a Chevrolet Cobalt car:
Renault Logan
- Landing comfort.
- Excellent organization of access to most controls.
- Pleasant and high-quality finishing materials.
- More comfortable, ergonomic and aesthetic than its rival.
- More space in the rear of the cabin in height.
- No steering column adjustment.
- Lack of automatic transmission.
- Missing engine temperature gauge in instrument cluster.
- Inconvenient adjustment of the distribution of air flows.
Test drive Renault Logan car:
Now let's try to digest all the above information. What do we get? Cobalt has fewer options and power unit he only has one to choose from. But there is a choice of automatic transmission and manual transmission.
Logan has more options, even though he doesn't have automatic box. This sedan also has a package selection system. All this a priori indicates that Renault Logan again showed a more friendly approach to the buyer than his opponent.
Conclusion
The experience of creating a car tailored for the budget market played a role. Chevrolet Cobalt in terms of consumer preferences is inferior to Logan. On the other hand, it is larger in size, and the configuration of the rear compartment itself is nothing but praise. Cobalt has a powerful and omnivorous suspension, it is unpretentious and simple.
If Cobalt was a little cheaper than it is, then he could compete with Logan, and so, this is still an unripe fruit that still has to grow and grow. Logan can be reproached, except perhaps for archaic engines, the modernization of which the manufacturer was obliged to carry out, even in the absence of real competition in the class.
The results of our comparative test are as follows. The game, to be honest, initially went only one way, and Cobalt acted as a defender. Only in the nomination "Trunk" he was able to win, but in the rest he completely lost to Logan. According to our experts, 69.5 points were given to the Chevrolet Cobalt, which, in addition to good trunk, also showed good functionality, excellent sound insulation and convenient steering.
Renault Logan gets 71.5 points. In almost all respects, he is head and shoulders above his opponent, and this is not surprising, because, as mentioned above, experience has done its job.
If the Renault Logan of the first generation was considered a newcomer debutant in the segment of inexpensive sedans, then the second generation turned it into an experienced master. Now - this is the starting point for all the "recruits" who have not yet had time to sniff the gunpowder. And the manufacturers of the Chevrolet Cobalt, who released this model as a direct competitor to Logan, should have understood this. Let's take both cars apart and find out if Cobalt Logan is worthy?
Renault Logan of the first generation immediately went to the masses
The fact that everything changes over time - and the budgets of buyers, and the concept of a "real" good car - is not new. I recall that a few years ago they said that the idea of the French automakers regarding Renault Dacia / Logan would cost good money. It seemed like they were counting on the amount of 5 thousand US dollars and did not aim for more. And indeed, at first the project was implemented and the first Logan went to the masses, only now the price confidently stepped over not 5, but 10 thousandth mark. Today, the dollar is not the same as it used to be, but Logan still holds on to the state employees segment and he does not have so many competitors.
Renault Logan car
Interestingly, Logan manufacturers set out to not easily compete with A-class cars, but compete with higher-class sedans. And the designers are trying, which is remarkable, by any means to create a good spaciousness of the cabin and make the size of the trunk incredibly voluminous. This rearmost compartment is larger than many golf carts and even rivals some D-class sedans.
A well-known car manufacturing company a few years ago was also interested in releasing similar budget models that would always keep the price. Citroen C-Elysee and the 301st, and last year Chevrolet, decided to play by the same rules and released a direct competitor into the arena - Chevrolet Cobalt. This car is the development of one of the branches of General Motors, which was originally aimed at the countries of the so-called third world. It was decided to start production of the Chevrolet Cobalt, respectively, in one of the Central Asian republics.
What are the differences
Let's start with the design, it would seem the most thankless task, but what can you do. It was the exterior surfaces of the Chevrolet Cobalt body that made us do it. They seem to be ironed, if not by amateurs, then by novice designers, but you can’t say this for sure by Logan’s appearance. It is immediately clear from it that this is a second-generation car, no money or effort was spared to improve its exterior.
Chevrolet Cobalt car The interior of both cars evokes almost the same sensations. Logan, for which exquisite solutions and expensive materials were limited (why be surprised, because this is a state employee ?!), should not have been, but it is perceived much more pleasantly and more logically than Cobalt. Here it is impossible not to note the layout features of the Cobalt cabin, where, in order to ensure maximum spaciousness, they emphasized in favor of a vertical landing and placed the front seats clearly high. It turns out that a driver with an average build, even with the lowest seat position, will still sit high, like on a chair. If the height of the driver is above average, then it is dangerous to get into this car, as you will definitely hit the ceiling with your head. It seems that in this situation you expect excellent visibility, but alas, in order for this to come true, you need to at least double the front pillars.
Advantage Logan
It is obvious. Better at Logan with vertical seat adjustment, which is not formal, like its competitor. In addition, the range of settings themselves is wide, and the driver's seat is very comfortable, even despite the shorter pillow. As for ergonomics, Logan could only be scolded for minor flaws, such as the LED button for the air conditioner, the rear power window keys, and so on.
In both cars, there is sufficient clearance in front of the knees of the rear passengers. As much as 10 cm of clearance is enough to comfortably travel the longest distances.
Chevrolet Cobalt interior In general, both in height and length, Logan represents more space. But the width is more spacious in Cobalt, which is clearly seen at shoulder level.
riding
Nobody was going to strictly judge both cars by driving characteristics. The fact is that it is enough for such sedans to show acceptable control accuracy, predictability of reactions and excellent stability. The rest is not so important.
But to test thoroughly the energy intensity of the suspension is another matter. And both sedans did not let us down, showing good resistance to breakdowns on rough roads. On our Russian roads, this parameter is very important.
Still more comfortable ride on Logan. Cobalt shakes more often on small bumps, and its body plays in unison with the longitudinal and transverse differences in road surfaces. All this negatively affects not only the passengers, but also the driver, who is constantly tense. In Russia, roads are not paved everywhere and Cobalt is already losing to Logan in this regard, which copes much better with bad roads.
But you can’t find fault with the suspension of both sedans. They do not lead to buildup even with alternating irregularities. In addition, with vigorous maneuvering, there is no feeling of rolling, as on some cars. Both cars showed themselves well in terms of motion sickness. Tested on children prone to motion sickness, and everything went without trouble.
| car model | ||
| body type | sedan/4/5 | sedan/4/5 |
| type of drive | front | front |
| Weight, kg | 1170 | 1127 |
| checkpoint | 5 MCP | 5 MCP |
| engine's type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Working volume, cm 3 | 1485 | 1598 |
| Maximum power, l. with. | 105 | 82/102 |
| Maximum speed, km/h | 170 | 180 |
| Acceleration time 0-100 km/h, s | 11,7 | 10,5 |
| Fuel consumption, l/100 km | 8,4/5,3/6,5 | 9,4/5,8/7,1 |
| Retail price, rubles | from 483 000 | from 428 000 |
Dynamics and its nuances
Some of our experts in the test called Cobalt more dynamic. But this is the case if you are not lazy and spin the motor more, switching to low gears in a timely manner.
In the dynamics of overclocking, Logan is unambiguous. He accelerates with great desire, and even from the bottom (without showing much skill, you can safely move off at 2nd speed). Logan does not impose special requirements on the choice of the desired stage and is much more convenient than Cobalt. One could say this: Logan is just the perfect car for novice drivers, but it's a pity that he does not have an automatic transmission, like the expensive version of Cobalt.
Prices
And finally, the most important thing for our buyer, who only recently began to understand that not only the cost of a car lies in its competent choice. So, prices for Cobalt versions start at 483 thousand rubles. I am glad that the basic version of the car includes heated front seats and mirrors in the options package, this is very important for our Russian winter. As for the acoustic system, only the so-called “preparation” is provided, for which the owner must already select the head speakers separately. But ABS, alloy wheels, fog lights, a computer, an alarm system - all this comes only with expensive versions, already for 572 thousand rubles, which includes the long-awaited automatic transmission.
As for the Logan, this sedan has a good choice in terms of engines. With a single 5 manual gearbox, you can choose the option with 82 liters. with. or from 102 l. with. The most affordable version with 82 hp. with. the engine is sold for 355 thousand rubles. It implies the presence of meager options. The cost of Renault Logan with a 102 hp engine. with. starts from 428 thousand rubles, but here the set of options is much wider. There are ABS, power steering and much more. Although, interestingly, air conditioning comes at an additional cost of 25 thousand rubles. The most expensive Renault Logan equipment includes the necessary set of security and comfort systems, and in addition to everything, it is possible to become the owner of the Multimedia navigation system for an additional payment of 14 thousand rubles.
Advantages and disadvantages
- Good capacity.
- The wide rear of the cabin compared to Renault Logan.
- The mirror adjustment panel is conveniently placed on the door, harmonizing on the same level with the mirror.
- The width of the space in the back seat is greater than that of the opponent.
- Convenient control of microclimate buttons.
- Easy to read and large numbers on the instrument scales.
- Driver's seat too high.
- Less comfortable interior overall.
- Worst quality finishing materials.
- Dissonance in the combination of digital and analog presentation of dials.
Test drive of a Chevrolet Cobalt car:
Renault Logan
- Landing comfort.
- Excellent organization of access to most controls.
- Pleasant and high-quality finishing materials.
- More comfortable, ergonomic and aesthetic than its rival.
- More space in the rear of the cabin in height.
- No steering column adjustment.
- Lack of AKP.
- Missing engine temperature gauge in instrument cluster.
- Inconvenient adjustment of the distribution of air flows.
Test drive Renault Logan car:
Now let's try to digest all the above information. What do we get? Cobalt has fewer options and has only one powertrain to choose from. But there is a choice of automatic transmission and manual transmission.
Logan has more options, even though it doesn't have an automatic. This sedan also has a package selection system. All this a priori indicates that Renault Logan again showed a more friendly approach to the buyer than his opponent.
Conclusion
The experience of creating a car tailored for the budget market played a role. Chevrolet Cobalt in terms of consumer preferences is inferior to Logan. On the other hand, it has a larger trunk, and the configuration of the rear compartment itself is nothing but praise. Cobalt has a powerful and omnivorous suspension, it is unpretentious and simple.
If Cobalt was a little cheaper than it is, then he could compete with Logan, and so, this is still an unripe fruit that still has to grow and grow. Logan can be reproached, except perhaps for archaic engines, the modernization of which the manufacturer was obliged to carry out, even in the absence of real competition in the class.
The results of our comparative test are as follows. The game, to be honest, initially went only one way, and Cobalt acted as a defender. Only in the nomination "Trunk" he was able to win, but in the rest he completely lost to Logan. According to our experts, 69.5 points were given to the Chevrolet Cobalt, which, in addition to a good trunk, also showed good functionality. brake system, excellent sound insulation and comfortable steering.
Renault Logan gets 71.5 points. In almost all respects, he is head and shoulders above his opponent, and this is not surprising, because, as mentioned above, experience has done its job.